Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.

[Mr Gray]

a discharged bankrupt can be a director...ask Simon Cowell

[Robittybob1]

Yes. But see G-Unit's earlier post.
As the Sun went off piste a bit yesterday I would have a bit of the six to fours on them snooping in that area to see if there is a good front pager for them to sell more copy. One way or another the McCann name still seems to sell copy.

Quote from the Sun: "What are the claims in Goncalo Amaral’s book?

In the book, it is claimed that Maddie had died in their holiday flat and her parents faked her abduction to cover up the tragedy.

The book was released just three days after Gerry and Kate were told their status as formal suspects had been lifted on July 21 2008.

Amaral is understood to have earned £344,000 from his book before it was banned and a subsequent TV documentary.

The McCanns told the Lisbon court staging the Amaral libel trial in the summer of 2014 they were left “devastated and crushed” by his allegations."

If Amaral claims this, "Maddie had died in their holiday flat and her parents faked her abduction to cover up the tragedy", it is no longer opinion.  The Supreme Court is wrong!

[stephen25000]

a discharged bankrupt can be a director...ask Simon Cowell

After how many years ?

[jassi]

a discharged bankrupt can be a director...ask Simon Cowell

What about an active bankrupt?

[stephen25000]

Quote from the Sun: "What are the claims in Goncalo Amaral’s book?

In the book, it is claimed that Maddie had died in their holiday flat and her parents faked her abduction to cover up the tragedy.

The book was released just three days after Gerry and Kate were told their status as formal suspects had been lifted on July 21 2008.

Amaral is understood to have earned £344,000 from his book before it was banned and a subsequent TV documentary.

The McCanns told the Lisbon court staging the Amaral libel trial in the summer of 2014 they were left “devastated and crushed” by his allegations."

If Amaral claims this, "Maddie had died in their holiday flat and her parents faked her abduction to cover up the tragedy", it is no longer opinion.  The Supreme Court is wrong!

So you are an expert in Portuguese Law ?

[jassi]

Quote from the Sun: "What are the claims in Goncalo Amaral’s book?

In the book, it is claimed that Maddie had died in their holiday flat and her parents faked her abduction to cover up the tragedy.

The book was released just three days after Gerry and Kate were told their status as formal suspects had been lifted on July 21 2008.

Amaral is understood to have earned £344,000 from his book before it was banned and a subsequent TV documentary.

The McCanns told the Lisbon court staging the Amaral libel trial in the summer of 2014 they were left “devastated and crushed” by his allegations."

If Amaral claims this, "Maddie had died in their holiday flat and her parents faked her abduction to cover up the tragedy", it is no longer opinion. The Supreme Court is wrong!

You really need to write and tell them. They'll be so grateful and immediately amend their findings

[Robittybob1]

So you are an expert in Portuguese Law ?

No, I don't know about corruption.

You really need to write and tell them. They'll be so grateful and immediately amend their findings

What is their address?

[Alfie]

Bankrupt shmankrupt.  My bro-in-law has been declared bankrupt.  Lives in a big house and drives a big car which he exchanges for an upgrade every 18 months.  Now owns a very successful £1m+ turnover business.
It's certainly not the end of the world that's for sure.

[jassi]

No, I don't know about corruption.
What is their address?

Supreme Court, Lisbon, Portugal, Europe  should do it. Don't forget  it will need extra stamps.

[Robittybob1]

Supreme Court, Lisbon, Portugal, Europe  should do it. Don't forget  it will need extra stamps.

Extra stamps! What are they for?  I'll send them a message on my Facebook page or like Trump I'll send a tweet.

[Eleanor]

LOL.   I remember the good old days of goading the opposition on here.  In those days I seem to remember getting a warning for it, but these days it seems goading is positively encouraged when it's McCann supporters you want to wind up, even the forum owner had a go. 

Still, I'm pretty confident I haven't had my last goad on this forum, plenty of opportunity for more in the months and years to come I'm sure...

Oh God.  Will it be that long?  I am 78 years old now and not actually senile just yet.  But I can feel it coming on occasionally.
How ever, don't bank on me giving up.

[Eleanor]

exactly the mcanns cant  wave a magic  wand and  make this  vanish can they? they are having  to face  a  real possibility of being bankrupt  from this

This from someone who still believes that Lindy Chamberlaine was guilty of the death of her daughter.

[Eleanor]

actully i dont so dont speak for me

I am so glad to hear this.  Merci Beaucoup.

[Alice Purjorick]

Your posts on this thread speak for themselves.  Of course you're reveling in the McCanns' current situation (as are all their detractors), only a fool could fail to see it and only a fool would try and deny it.

Some of us have some decorum old stick and are reveling in something quite different..................

[misty]

It then has to show up as a loan to the company. It does not appear to on the balance sheets nor is it mentioned in the directors annual reports as far as I can see. If it does the lender can call in the loan when the terms of the loan allow.
Once in the company's bank account it belongs to the company which as you know is a completely separate legal person from the McCanns.
The bottom line is whoever's names are on the writ as the plaintiffs now have to cough up. Where the money actually comes from is immaterial.
I was only pointing out what can happen. As the accounts are heralded by some as being so tranparent it should be easy to work out if one is really interested....

I'm interested in your opinion on this part of Director's loans:-

A director’s loan is when you (or other close family members) get money from your company that isn’t:

a salary, dividend or expense repayment
money you’ve previously paid into or loaned the company