Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.

[Eleanor]

thats just your opinion alf ....

you wouldn't be saying that if it was the other way round .........

so don.t take it to personal ......

It is all an opinion in the end.  Even for The Courts of Portugal.  The young ones said Aye and the old ones said Nay.  That should tell you something.  Things will change.

[Mr Gray]

you hope davel .................

doesn't mean to say its true .................

works both ways ......G A could have a lot more to say about them .....

after all he was the officer on the case .....

he was privy to info ....you are not

I think its been proved that I  understand the info far better than he does

[barrier]

It is all an opinion in the end.  Even for The Courts of Portugal.  The young ones said Aye and the old ones said Nay.  That should tell you something.  Things will change.

Is it known the ages of the said Judges then?

[Eleanor]

It may be the one that counts at this point but I think the verdict will give the Mccanns story a lot more value than the money that is lost. The McCanns will move on and they have an opprtunity to make a fortune for their fund. t' like a  lot of things in life until you have walked in darkness you cannot see the light ...the Mccanns will come back stronger and they could well have alot to say about amaral and the portuguese justice system which will make very uncomfortable raeding for some

Yes.  I am ignoring this at the moment.  I am more interested in their bizarre attitude to The Law.  But it has vaguely occurred to me that The McCanns could now make minced meat of Amaral.

[stephen25000]

I think its been proved that I  understand the info far better than he does

Nope. You merely give your bias.

Nothing more.

You are neither a police officer or legal expert.

Just an amateur.

[xtina]

I think its been proved that I  understand the info far better than he does

have you got a cite...............proving that ....

you don't know what he knows yet.............

[Alfie]

Yes the early days. Certainly not now.

What changed?  Do you think a news headline such as "The Met knows what happened to Madeleine McCann" or "Madeleine's parents arrested" would attract very little interest these days?  Upon what do you base your opinion?

[xtina]

It is all an opinion in the end.  Even for The Courts of Portugal.  The young ones said Aye and the old ones said Nay.  That should tell you something.  Things will change.

for courts it is points of law ........not IMO

[Eleanor]

for courts it is points of law ........not IMO

What points of Law?  Do you even understand what a point of Law is?  Or do you just settle for what you are told?

[xtina]

It may be the one that counts at this point but I think the verdict will give the Mccanns story a lot more value than the money that is lost. The McCanns will move on and they have an opprtunity to make a fortune for their fund. t' like a  lot of things in life until you have walked in darkness you cannot see the light ...the Mccanns will come back stronger and they could well have alot to say about amaral and the portuguese justice system which will make very uncomfortable raeding for some

they are not going to want to .promote ..or discuss ....

.what they have tried to ban for 8 years.............

[xtina]

What points of Law?  Do you even understand what a point of Law is?  Or do you just settle for what you are told?

 ....well i do know it is not done by there opinion.........its still a court fgs

[jassi]

It may be the one that counts at this point but I think the verdict will give the Mccanns story a lot more value than the money that is lost. The McCanns will move on and they have an opprtunity to make a fortune for their fund. t' like a  lot of things in life until you have walked in darkness you cannot see the light ...the Mccanns will come back stronger and they could well have alot to say about amaral and the portuguese justice system which will make very uncomfortable raeding for some

Oh Davel, you do say the funniest of things   

[G-Unit]

Well now, I believe that the first judgement was perfectly correct.  Or do you think she was a fool?

Is it the verdict you found correct or the judgement? The judge rested her whole judgement upon Anaral's former profession and her opinion of the duties that imposed upon him. The Appeal judges rejected her opinion of the duties imposed upon a retired police officer and the Supreme Court agreed with them.

Given the lack of evidence to support the allegations of the claimants the judge used jurisprudence to make a case against Amaral. Given the demolition of her attempt by the judges in the higher courts that was probably a mistake.

[xtina]

Eleanor has never accused you of murdering your eldest daughter ....

whats your point.

who has accused mccs of murdering maddie ...............

[Mr Gray]

Nope. You merely give your bias.

Nothing more.

You are neither a police officer or legal expert.

Just an amateur.

Doesnt meana nything...I have met several police officers and lawyers who should not be in their jobs and im sure you have too