Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 270084 times)

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #915 on: February 06, 2017, 04:08:56 PM »
You seem obsessed with bankruptcy. Your house can certainly be sold under certain conditions. Anyone contemplating it as a solution to their debt problems needs to think carefully.
https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/debt-solutions/bankruptcy-2/is-bankruptcy-right-for-you/

If the debt was passed to the English High Court I assume they could make an attachment of earnings order just like any court if required.

Of course your house may be sold but not necessarily
Bankruptcy may be an option

Bankruptcy would also prevent amaral from suing for damages
« Last Edit: February 06, 2017, 04:12:28 PM by davel »

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #916 on: February 06, 2017, 04:10:34 PM »
Yes, like paying up   ?{)(**
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #917 on: February 06, 2017, 04:10:42 PM »
The McCanns don't appear to have any assets, and the house will be very close to negative equity, even less if it is put up for auction.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #918 on: February 06, 2017, 04:13:58 PM »
The McCanns don't appear to have any assets, and the house will be very close to negative equity, even less if it is put up for auction.

The house would be valued on a forced sale value
If there is little or no equity they can keep it

Offline Eleanor

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #919 on: February 06, 2017, 04:19:56 PM »
The house would be valued on a forced sale value
If there is little or no equity they can keep it

Putting it on the open market with virtually no extra value isn't a good idea either.  That could take years, and the house bandits are forever looking for a bargain.

Perhaps someone on this forum would like to make a large offer.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #920 on: February 06, 2017, 04:47:09 PM »
The McCanns don't appear to have any assets, and the house will be very close to negative equity, even less if it is put up for auction.

How do you know what they have and the state of their mortgage? They may have loads in the bank and have paid their mortgage off.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #921 on: February 06, 2017, 04:54:23 PM »
Isabel won't be best pleased if they were to weasel out of paying her fees.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #922 on: February 06, 2017, 05:48:51 PM »
Is it not?  I thought the McCanns were going to be bankrupted by Amaral which puts potentially puts their home at stake, yah?

I would have thought Sr Amaral is the least of their worries at the moment.
If there are insufficient funds to satisfy the court they will be debtors to the court. That is a totally different game.
Then of course there is Dra Duarte to be appeased but quite where everyone will appear in the pecking order is to be seen. The Court will be on top of the heap though and they hold the power.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #923 on: February 06, 2017, 06:06:05 PM »
I would have thought Sr Amaral is the least of their worries at the moment.
If there are insufficient funds to satisfy the court they will be debtors to the court. That is a totally different game.
Then of course there is Dra Duarte to be appeased but quite where everyone will appear in the pecking order is to be seen. The Court will be on top of the heap though and they hold the power.

Too right, though in their mind  he will remain the cause of all their ills for many years.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #924 on: February 06, 2017, 06:11:30 PM »
I would have thought Sr Amaral is the least of their worries at the moment.
If there are insufficient funds to satisfy the court they will be debtors to the court. That is a totally different game.
Then of course there is Dra Duarte to be appeased but quite where everyone will appear in the pecking order is to be seen. The Court will be on top of the heap though and they hold the power.


owing money to court is not a different game.....if they dont have it thats it

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #925 on: February 06, 2017, 06:28:44 PM »

owing money to court is not a different game.....if they dont have it thats it

It is. Once the courts man is in he has the power to "Leave No Stone Unturned", as one might say, in his quest for assets. Your argument is overly simplistic.

By the way this argument has been going this pm it would appear that the supporters will see it as a major victory if their heros are made homeless and penniless as long as they don't pay out to anything Portuguese.
La la la
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #926 on: February 06, 2017, 06:30:42 PM »
It is. Once the courts man is in he has the power to "Leave No Stone Unturned", as one might say, in his quest for assets. Your argument is overly simplistic.

By the way this argument has been going this pm it would appear that the supporters will see it as a major victory if their heros are made homeless and penniless as long as they don't pay out to anything Portuguese.
La la la


the court man has no more power than any other debtor apart from being at the top of the list

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #927 on: February 06, 2017, 06:32:20 PM »

owing money to court is not a different game.....if they dont have it thats it

The High Court Enforcement Officers will make sure they either get the full amount or a payment plan. Default on that and they will be back.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #928 on: February 06, 2017, 06:35:03 PM »

the court man has no more power than any other debtor apart from being at the top of the list

He has the power to take your goods and sell them.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #929 on: February 06, 2017, 06:36:34 PM »

the court man has no more power than any other debtor apart from being at the top of the list

If it is an enforced bankruptcy he has ultimate power.......... and  the court can enforce the bankruptcy if their bill is not paid and see G-Units earlier post about transfer of debt.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey