Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 270211 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #960 on: February 06, 2017, 10:04:43 PM »

you obviously do not understand their powers

Oh I do.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #961 on: February 06, 2017, 10:06:17 PM »

you obviously do not understand their powers

Have you any idea of the powers they have , authorised by the relevant court authority ?

Offline Erngath

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #962 on: February 06, 2017, 10:09:58 PM »
No Erngath, nothing like that.  Expensive wrist watches or valuable ornaments perhaps, but not ordinary items of furniture or kitchen equipment.

Hopefully that will not happen.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #963 on: February 06, 2017, 10:10:25 PM »
the enforcement officers only act when the debtors have not co operated or have failed to keep up payment under an agreemnet...they are a last resort by the court

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #964 on: February 06, 2017, 10:12:09 PM »
The court costs wil be sizeable ...iro £50 K....and posters here think the court are going to pop round and take gerry's golf clubs....what rubbish...typical sceptic logic

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #965 on: February 06, 2017, 10:25:06 PM »
The court costs wil be sizeable ...iro £50 K....and posters here think the court are going to pop round and take gerry's golf clubs....what rubbish...typical sceptic logic

They can sell houses, cars, IT equipment, Audio Visual Equipment, jewellery, art,  etc. Etc.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #966 on: February 06, 2017, 10:26:49 PM »
the people who have the bailiffs come are those who have not opened the letters....ignored the offers of help...all they have to do is say i can only afford 20 pounds a month and if thats all they can afford the court will accept it

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #967 on: February 06, 2017, 10:28:34 PM »
They can sell houses, cars, IT equipment, Audio Visual Equipment, jewellery, art,  etc. Etc.


if it is going to come anywhere near that the debtor files for protection.....you really do not understand


then the ONLY thing they can go after is the house...presumimg the car is on credit....NOTHING else....

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #968 on: February 06, 2017, 10:29:41 PM »
the people who have the bailiffs come are those who have not opened the letters....ignored the offers of help...all they have to do is say i can only afford 20 pounds a month and if thats all they can afford the court will accept it

If it is acceptable to those owed.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #969 on: February 06, 2017, 10:29:47 PM »
the people who have the bailiffs come are those who have not opened the letters....ignored the offers of help...all they have to do is say i can only afford 20 pounds a month and if thats all they can afford the court will accept it
It's what Tony Bennett did isn't it?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #970 on: February 06, 2017, 10:31:45 PM »
If it is acceptable to those owed.

it is up to the court.... those who are owed cannot order the bailifffs in...they can only file for bankruptcy

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #971 on: February 06, 2017, 10:43:18 PM »
It's what Tony Bennett did isn't it?


thats right

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #972 on: February 06, 2017, 10:51:48 PM »
"Disadvantages of going bankrupt

To apply to go bankrupt you’ll need to pay a £680 fee. Other disadvantages of going bankrupt include:

    if your income is high enough, you’ll be asked to make payments towards your debts for 3 years
    it will be more difficult to take out credit while you're bankrupt and your credit rating will be affected for 6 years
    if you own your home, it might have to be sold (but you may be able to apply to your local authority for re-housing)
    some of your possessions might have to be sold, for example, your car and any luxury items you own
    if you are, or are about to be, the right age to get your pension savings, these might be taken
    some professions don’t let people who have been made bankrupt carry on working
    if you own a business it might be closed down and the assets sold off
    going bankrupt can affect your immigration status
    your bankruptcy will be published publicly (although if you’re worried you or your family maybe the victims of violence, you can ask that your details aren’t given out)"

And of course the whole piggin' works is controlled by The Insolvency Service which administers compulsory company liquidations and personal bankruptcies and deals with misconduct through investigation of companies and enforcement. The man in charge is the Official Receiver of whom you need know but two things
1 He is an officer of the court and
2 He is a licensed mugger whose job is to liquidate as many assets as possible and re-distribute them as quickly as possible among the creditors according to their standing on the totem pole. He cannot sell the tools of your trade.
These are all things that may happen that is not to say they will but the name McCann is not a Kevlar Jacket a device by which one can walk on water or an exemption certificate from the law, whatever some may like to believe. In short they are as likely to cop a live one as anybody else.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #973 on: February 06, 2017, 11:02:13 PM »
it is up to the court.... those who are owed cannot order the bailifffs in...they can only file for bankruptcy

You are out of touch. A high court order by those who are owed can get enforcement officers in to take possession of goods to satisfy the debt.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #974 on: February 06, 2017, 11:04:17 PM »
You are out of touch. A high court order by those who are owed can get enforcement officers in to take possession of goods to satisfy the debt.
But St Goncalo of Amaral would never be so mean, surely?