« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 67 68 [69] 70 71 ... 143   Go Down

Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 270381 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1020 on: February 07, 2017, 04:32:04 PM »
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1021 on: February 07, 2017, 04:33:27 PM »
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1022 on: February 07, 2017, 04:40:44 PM »
Quote from: barrier on February 07, 2017, 04:17:09 PM
I suspect its not going to be easy reading for some,can see it now,the supreme court judges misunderstand the dog alerts.
This is quite interesting and it's a pity we can't get a good explanation of this

The court can't really think the lefts are proven.....they couldn't be that misguided surely
Logged

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1023 on: February 07, 2017, 04:45:07 PM »
The translation of the judgement is being made now I suspect,apparently it runs to 76 pages.
Logged
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1024 on: February 07, 2017, 04:46:51 PM »
Quote from: barrier on February 07, 2017, 04:45:07 PM
The translation of the judgement is being made now I suspect,apparently it runs to 76 pages.

Didnt gunit say there wouldn't be a judgement
Just a refusal of the appeal
Logged

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1025 on: February 07, 2017, 04:54:56 PM »
Well its out there,link provided earlier by faithhilly.
Logged
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Brietta

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1026 on: February 07, 2017, 04:57:58 PM »
Quote from: davel on February 07, 2017, 04:30:51 PM
Part of the proven facts
It is there

Thanks Davel ... I'll check that out ... it was all nearly two years ago after all.
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1027 on: February 07, 2017, 04:59:48 PM »
Logged
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Brietta

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1028 on: February 07, 2017, 05:03:10 PM »
Quote from: jassi on February 07, 2017, 04:59:48 PM
From The Portugal Resident

http://portugalresident.com/supreme-court-ruling-opens-new-can-of-worms-for-mccanns

Hmmm ... therefore the same interpretation from Textusa applies to Robert Murat and any other innocent person.

Think I'll probably hang on and wait for a translation from an unbiased source.  Which is neither of the two mentioned or Ms Donn.

However it indicates the way the spin is going to be spun. 
« Last Edit: February 07, 2017, 05:09:42 PM by Brietta »
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1029 on: February 07, 2017, 05:08:37 PM »
Not sure how much we can trust the accuracy of donn but the presumption of innocence is I believe a fundamental human right ... so have the Supreme Court totally ignored the human rights of the McCanns
Perhaps this will be an easier route to the ECHR if the McCanns decide to take that route
Logged

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1030 on: February 07, 2017, 05:10:21 PM »
Cold comfort.

When I am in the mire ankle deep head first it is rather irrelevant who else may be in the same position in the same dung heap.
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1031 on: February 07, 2017, 05:12:33 PM »
Quote from: Alice Purjorick on February 07, 2017, 05:10:21 PM
Cold comfort.

When I am in the mire ankle deep head first it is rather irrelevant who else may be in the same position in the same dung heap.

I'm sure you are an expert in this area
Logged

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1032 on: February 07, 2017, 05:36:08 PM »
Quote from: davel on February 07, 2017, 05:12:33 PM
I'm sure you are an expert in this area

As the Municipal Engineer said :
It may be shit to you boy, but it's my bread and butter, and as people like me say to people like you. If that's your best shot you are in the wrong ring.
Cue a there I wuz story about being a Sensei in Origami.
Logged
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1033 on: February 07, 2017, 05:50:53 PM »
Quote from: Alice Purjorick on February 07, 2017, 05:36:08 PM
As the Municipal Engineer said :
It may be shit to you boy, but it's my bread and butter, and as people like me say to people like you. If that's your best shot you are in the wrong ring.
Cue a there I wuz story about being a Sensei in Origami.

You seem to be taking this far too seriously
Logged

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1034 on: February 07, 2017, 05:57:27 PM »
Quote from: Brietta on February 07, 2017, 04:28:30 PM
Why do you think there will be any mention of dog alerts?

Why indeed?

And why no mention of the dog-alerts in the version of the judgement we read on-line?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 67 68 [69] 70 71 ... 143   Go Up
« previous next »