Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 253439 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1680 on: February 16, 2017, 10:59:17 AM »
I see they are making different headlines in another paper.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2876843/kate-gerry-mccann-cashing-in-anniversary-maddies-disappearance/

Interesting use of the word plotting, rather than planning in the headline.  8(0(*

After Mitchell's statement it might be difficult for them to benefit from any 'bidding war'
They are asking for any money.
"He told The Sun Online: “They want to make it clear that they are not making any money out of Madeleine’s disappearance. Any claims are spurious nonsense but fits in with the Portuguese agenda.”"
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1681 on: February 16, 2017, 10:59:35 AM »
I see they are making different headlines in another paper.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2876843/kate-gerry-mccann-cashing-in-anniversary-maddies-disappearance/

Interesting use of the word plotting, rather than planning in the headline.  8(0(*

After Mitchell's statement it might be difficult for them to benefit from any 'bidding war'
This is the most interesting bit IMO
"Both (interviews) are being organised through Scotland Yard, Mitchell explained. He said: “There will be no fee.”

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1682 on: February 16, 2017, 11:01:41 AM »
"Accept Nothing".  First line of your signature... 8(0(*

That is part of the advice given to UK policemen when investigating, and very good advice too. It isn't anything to do with questioning the findings of a court of law. Even if the decision of a court seems wrong, there are ways of criticising without using zenophobia.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1683 on: February 16, 2017, 11:04:20 AM »
That is part of the advice given to UK policemen when investigating, and very good advice too. It isn't anything to do with questioning the findings of a court of law. Even if the decision of a court seems wrong, there are ways of criticising without using zenophobia.
no one is using xenophobia.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1684 on: February 16, 2017, 11:07:53 AM »
They are asking for any money.
"He told The Sun Online: “They want to make it clear that they are not making any money out of Madeleine’s disappearance. Any claims are spurious nonsense but fits in with the Portuguese agenda.”"

and I just saw a green and pink striped Lion fly past my office window.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2017, 11:17:53 AM by stephen25000 »

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1685 on: February 16, 2017, 11:09:11 AM »
Perhaps you could explain how publicity that Madeleine is dead and her parents hid her body is good for Madeleine?

It keeps people interested.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1686 on: February 16, 2017, 11:11:08 AM »
It keeps people interested.
it keeps people's hatred of the McCanns alive you mean, it does nothing to help discover Madeleine or what happened to her,

Offline faithlilly

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1687 on: February 16, 2017, 11:16:51 AM »
it keeps people's hatred of the McCanns alive you mean, it does nothing to help discover Madeleine or what happened to her,

Why do you think the McCanns are objects of this supposed 'hatred' ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline misty

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1688 on: February 16, 2017, 11:23:13 AM »
Why do you think the McCanns are objects of this supposed 'hatred' ?

Probably because they are able to do what others can't by fighting the system.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1689 on: February 16, 2017, 11:25:47 AM »
Faithlilly, you asked me not to read your posts, so I put you on ignore.  Don't then ask me questions expecting answers, unless your posts to me are quoted by others I won't see them.  Hope that's clear  8((()*/

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1690 on: February 16, 2017, 11:26:10 AM »
Probably because they are able to do what others can't by fighting the system.

What a load of cobblers.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1691 on: February 16, 2017, 11:45:32 AM »
Play nicely guys and posts on topic would be a bonus!!
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline faithlilly

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1692 on: February 16, 2017, 11:50:45 AM »
Probably because they are able to do what others can't by fighting the system.

Fighting the system ? What 'system' and how exactly are they fighting it ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1693 on: February 16, 2017, 11:51:52 AM »
Faithlilly, you asked me not to read your posts, so I put you on ignore.  Don't then ask me questions expecting answers, unless your posts to me are quoted by others I won't see them.  Hope that's clear  8((()*/

Fair dos  8(0(*
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #1694 on: February 16, 2017, 11:53:37 AM »
Fighting the system ? What 'system' and how exactly are they fighting it ?

They like fighting. That's why they had a 'fighting Fund' - easier than searching.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future