Author Topic: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.  (Read 253379 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2010 on: February 23, 2017, 07:47:27 PM »
They may not have jurisdiction
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2011 on: February 23, 2017, 09:55:27 PM »
The 'story they ran with' to which you refer was the disappearance without trace of their dearly loved eldest child.

Absolutely shameful that there are those who have denigrated their efforts on her behalf for very close on ten years ... inclusive of the superhuman effort of being responsible for getting initially Scotland Yard to start a proper investigation of Madeleine McCann's case which was closely followed by the Policia Judiciaria.
The story they ran with was an abduction! no other thesis was to be considered, or discussed. Especially in  the UK Press.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Brietta

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2012 on: February 23, 2017, 10:43:49 PM »
The story they ran with was an abduction! no other thesis was to be considered, or discussed. Especially in  the UK Press.

The police decide on the path an investigation will take by following the evidence.  The victims who are also witnesses give information pertaining to the crime.

The present Policia Justicaria investigation features heavily on abduction and possible connection to home invasions where children were assaulted.

The present Scotland Yard investigation also featured stranger abduction in relation to home invasions by burglars and home invasions featuring assaults on minors.

You are deluded if you believe the terms of either the PJ or SY investigations were dictated by the McCanns and not professional police work.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2013 on: February 23, 2017, 11:10:09 PM »
The police decide on the path an investigation will take by following the evidence.  The victims who are also witnesses give information pertaining to the crime.

The present Policia Justicaria investigation features heavily on abduction and possible connection to home invasions where children were assaulted.

The present Scotland Yard investigation also featured stranger abduction in relation to home invasions by burglars and home invasions featuring assaults on minors.

You are deluded if you believe the terms of either the PJ or SY investigations were dictated by the McCanns and not professional police work.

"The present Policia Justicaria investigation features heavily on abduction and possible connection to home invasions where children were assaulted." My apologies I must have missed that statement, could you direct me to who made it and when? thankies in advance.

At last you are recognising police investigation- including the coordinator were professionals. Oh wait... are they only professionals because they are, according to your 'sauces', investigating an abduction based on connection to invasions by many people to many children? would these many people be UK residents who socialised with a known paedophile who had a home in the area?.   

 *&*%£ *&*%£ *&*%£

'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2014 on: February 23, 2017, 11:43:03 PM »
What are you on about?
" Duarte's claim that they were cleared by the archiving dispatch."  The McCanns seem to be aware they weren't cleared. 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2015 on: February 24, 2017, 06:48:11 AM »
The police decide on the path an investigation will take by following the evidence.  The victims who are also witnesses give information pertaining to the crime.

The present Policia Justicaria investigation features heavily on abduction and possible connection to home invasions where children were assaulted.

The present Scotland Yard investigation also featured stranger abduction in relation to home invasions by burglars and home invasions featuring assaults on minors.

You are deluded if you believe the terms of either the PJ or SY investigations were dictated by the McCanns and not professional police work.

You are deluded if you think the McCanns didn't interfere in the Portuguese investigation from the beginning. They named the crime, publicised it and began criticising the investigators before dawn on 4th May. 
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2016 on: February 24, 2017, 07:01:51 AM »
You are deluded if you think the McCanns didn't interfere in the Portuguese investigation from the beginning. They named the crime, publicised it and began criticising the investigators before dawn on 4th May.
All I can think is they are allowed to do this.  There was no law against it.  The Portuguese just needed to be resilient.  Things like that should not have put them off.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2017 on: February 24, 2017, 07:08:14 AM »
You are deluded if you think the McCanns didn't interfere in the Portuguese investigation from the beginning. They named the crime, publicised it and began criticising the investigators before dawn on 4th May.
That's idiotic.  It is perfectly reasonable to expect parents in that situation to believe their child has been abducted, to publicise it and even criticise the efforts made to find her if they feel not enough is being done.  It is not interfering with a police investigation.  I suppose in a similar situation you would have voiced no opinion, said nothing to anyone, kept scthum througout.  Yeah right!

Offline G-Unit

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2018 on: February 24, 2017, 07:50:23 AM »
That's idiotic.  It is perfectly reasonable to expect parents in that situation to believe their child has been abducted, to publicise it and even criticise the efforts made to find her if they feel not enough is being done.  It is not interfering with a police investigation.  I suppose in a similar situation you would have voiced no opinion, said nothing to anyone, kept scthum througout.  Yeah right!

Of course it interfered, whatever their motives were.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2019 on: February 24, 2017, 08:10:32 AM »
Of course it interfered, whatever their motives were.

and you are deluded if you dont realise what a bungled investigation the pj carried out

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2020 on: February 24, 2017, 08:11:25 AM »
Of course it interfered, whatever their motives were.
But interference is allowed.  Was there something they were wanting to remain hidden when they asked for no interference?
« Last Edit: February 24, 2017, 08:36:28 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2021 on: February 24, 2017, 08:21:41 AM »
and you are deluded if you dont realise what a bungled investigation the pj carried out

Well, if you believe that old myth, then you have to believe the same about OG.

They have found Foxtrot Alpha. 8)--))
« Last Edit: February 24, 2017, 08:23:49 AM by stephen25000 »

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2022 on: February 24, 2017, 08:36:32 AM »
and you are deluded if you dont realise what a bungled investigation the pj carried out

Hmmm,the mighty MET have now at their head the officer in command of the bungled operation that lead to the death of an innocent man on the London underground,perhaps they are made for each other.


Mod Note: The jury at the inquest into the death of Jean Charles de Menezes returned an open verdict
« Last Edit: February 24, 2017, 05:01:59 PM by Brietta »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2023 on: February 24, 2017, 08:41:11 AM »
Hmmm,the mighty MET have now at their head the officer in command of the bungled operation that lead to the murder of an innocent man on the London underground,perhaps they are made for each other.
Why the secrecy?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Supreme Court rules against the McCanns in damages case.
« Reply #2024 on: February 24, 2017, 08:43:43 AM »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.