Absence Of.......Whatever. I can never remember the right way round.
In an Oct 2016 report where I got flame-grilled by the Mirror, it was abundantly clear to me which parts were based on truth, and which parts had simply been concocted in the UK at a journalist's desk.
To many an other, it looked like something more substantial.
However, all it was, roughly speaking, was the media filling some more column inches with whatever they could dredge up. Sprinkled with a hefty splosh of imagination.
So why don't we have tales from the media of OG interviewing the T9? It would fill report after report after report. Surely I can't be more important? I turn up but the T9 alleged re-interviews do not? Don't think so.
Until someone provides a shred of evidence that the T9 were re-interviewed prior to the OG remit then the known facts are that someone unknown decided the OG remit which was based on something unknown.