Author Topic: Proof of abduction  (Read 26378 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Benice

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #105 on: February 16, 2017, 08:57:06 AM »
Rather than the Sunday Times, how about a direct quote and verified, from Mr. Smith himself.

As to abduction, didn't Redwood say before he left the job..........................


 ' ..... the assumption that Madeleine was abducted "may not follow with all our thinking" on the case...'


https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/mar/19/madeleine-mccann-police-intruder-girls-algarve

...and the bed in this case, looked hardly disturbed at all, and certainly didn't look like someone had sat on it.

That comment was made in the context of the intruder who had sexually assaulted many UK children in their beds.    Anyone who thinks he was in any way pointing a finger at the McCanns is allowing their wishful thinking to get the better of them IMO.

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline G-Unit

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #106 on: February 16, 2017, 08:57:21 AM »
Indeed Ferryman  -  and I don't think Mrs Smith would have any sympathy for the McCanns - let alone be heartbroken for them -if she thought they had anything to do with their daughter's disappearance.

Quote

This weekend,  Mr Smith's wife Mary told the Mail on Sunday her husband had no regrets about coming forward.

He [Martin] doesn't want to talk, said Mrs Smith. He said what he had to say. I was with him [that night]. We saw a man carrying a child and that's all we know. We told them all that and that's it.

''The man he saw had the same stature as Gerry McCann. We felt we had to help. We're happy we did. We reported exactly what we saw.

"We only did what we thought was right for a missing girl and our hearts are breaking for her parents, as it would be if it were one of ours.

''I feel very much for them [the McCanns]. I have six grandchildren of my own and six children of my own.

"The poor McCann family must be heartbroken.''
End quote

Quote from the Sunday Times

There was also an uncomfortable complication with Smith’s account. He had originally told the police that he had “recognised something” about the way Gerry McCann carried one of his children which reminded him of the man he had seen in Praia da Luz.

Smith has since stressed that he does not believe the man he saw was Gerry, and Scotland Yard do not consider this a possibility. Last week the McCanns were told officially by the Portuguese authorities that they are not suspects.
End quote

I have seen nothing from Mr Smith stressing any such thing.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Benice

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #107 on: February 16, 2017, 09:16:02 AM »
I have seen nothing from Mr Smith stressing any such thing.

That may be the case.    However Mr Smith made a point of threatening legal action against newspapers which had misrepresented him.   

As it is such a massive claim for the Times to make about him, then I do not believe he would have allowed the claim to go unchallenged if it was all a huge lie.      However, no retraction or apology was ever made by the Sunday Times regarding that statement.   That is strong evidence IMO that no complaint was ever received by them.
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #108 on: February 16, 2017, 09:31:46 AM »
That comment was made in the context of the intruder who had sexually assaulted many UK children in their beds.    Anyone who thinks he was in any way pointing a finger at the McCanns is allowing their wishful thinking to get the better of them IMO.

The statement is clear cut.

Now where did I say he was pointing a finger at the McCann's ?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #109 on: February 16, 2017, 11:19:01 AM »
That may be the case.    However Mr Smith made a point of threatening legal action against newspapers which had misrepresented him.   

As it is such a massive claim for the Times to make about him, then I do not believe he would have allowed the claim to go unchallenged if it was all a huge lie.      However, no retraction or apology was ever made by the Sunday Times regarding that statement.   That is strong evidence IMO that no complaint was ever received by them.

If is identification is part of the ongoing investigation by OG do you really think he'd sue the Times at this point?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Benice

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #110 on: February 16, 2017, 06:06:19 PM »
If is identification is part of the ongoing investigation by OG do you really think he'd sue the Times at this point?

Yes if they had printed a massive lie about him. 

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline faithlilly

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #111 on: February 16, 2017, 06:27:48 PM »
Yes if they had printed a massive lie about him.

Then we'll have to agree to disagree.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #112 on: February 16, 2017, 06:33:41 PM »
i dont  get this  sue happy society is money really that inportant?

Offline jassi

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #113 on: February 16, 2017, 06:35:16 PM »
i dont  get this  sue happy society is money really that inportant?

To some people it is everything.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #114 on: February 16, 2017, 06:49:12 PM »
Indeed Ferryman  -  and I don't think Mrs Smith would have any sympathy for the McCanns - let alone be heartbroken for them -if she thought they had anything to do with their daughter's disappearance.

Quote

This weekend,  Mr Smith's wife Mary told the Mail on Sunday her husband had no regrets about coming forward.

He [Martin] doesn't want to talk, said Mrs Smith. He said what he had to say. I was with him [that night]. We saw a man carrying a child and that's all we know. We told them all that and that's it.

''The man he saw had the same stature as Gerry McCann. We felt we had to help. We're happy we did. We reported exactly what we saw.

"We only did what we thought was right for a missing girl and our hearts are breaking for her parents, as it would be if it were one of ours.

''I feel very much for them [the McCanns]. I have six grandchildren of my own and six children of my own.

"The poor McCann family must be heartbroken.''
End quote

Quote from the Sunday Times

There was also an uncomfortable complication with Smith’s account. He had originally told the police that he had “recognised something” about the way Gerry McCann carried one of his children which reminded him of the man he had seen in Praia da Luz.

Smith has since stressed that he does not believe the man he saw was Gerry, and Scotland Yard do not consider this a possibility. Last week the McCanns were told officially by the Portuguese authorities that they are not suspects.
End quote

You are a star, Benice ....

I've been looking for that all over.

Thank you.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #115 on: February 16, 2017, 07:32:44 PM »
You are a star, Benice ....

I've been looking for that all over.

Thank you.

I can't think why, it's just a rumour in a newspaper. No quote from Mr Smith, no hint of why they said it, it means nothing.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #116 on: February 16, 2017, 09:21:20 PM »
I can't think why, it's just a rumour in a newspaper. No quote from Mr Smith, no hint of why they said it, it means nothing.

Why would Martin and Mary, either, have produced efits of a man they thought was Gerry?

Cheap-shots about "the Irish" strictly barred ....

Offline G-Unit

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #117 on: February 16, 2017, 10:26:56 PM »
Why would Martin and Mary, either, have produced efits of a man they thought was Gerry?

Cheap-shots about "the Irish" strictly barred ....

I have no intention of entering into one of your torturous arguments. There is no record of Mr Smith saying he had changed his mind about who he thought he saw. When you find a direct quote I look forward to seeing it.

Why would anyone make cheap shots about the Irish? The only cheap shots I've seen on here are aimed at the Portuguese and the odd UK police officer.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #118 on: February 17, 2017, 06:09:31 AM »
I have no intention of entering into one of your torturous arguments. There is no record of Mr Smith saying he had changed his mind about who he thought he saw. When you find a direct quote I look forward to seeing it.

Why would anyone make cheap shots about the Irish? The only cheap shots I've seen on here are aimed at the Portuguese and the odd UK police officer.

So you want a direct quote
You do realise that the mccannn statements in the files that you put so much store on do not contain any direct quotes

Offline G-Unit

Re: Proof of abduction
« Reply #119 on: February 17, 2017, 06:37:50 AM »
So you want a direct quote
You do realise that the mccannn statements in the files that you put so much store on do not contain any direct quotes

You are talking about two different things. An official signed statement and an unconfirmed newspaper report.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0