Author Topic: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.  (Read 3804 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Daisy

Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #75 on: December 31, 2017, 08:43:29 AM »
Don't most well heeled guys use plastic these days?

Thatís a good point. I didnít think of that. If Mark can prove he drew money out or paid for goods miles away from the family home then that puts him out of the picture. I asked him some direct questions from the forum in my last letter which included a Christmas card and a cheque. I havenít heard a thing from him, not a card or a thank you. I am not at all pleased as that is a lack of manners.

Online John

Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #76 on: December 31, 2017, 01:57:56 PM »
That’s a good point. I didn’t think of that. If Mark can prove he drew money out or paid for goods miles away from the family home then that puts him out of the picture. I asked him some direct questions from the forum in my last letter which included a Christmas card and a cheque. I haven’t heard a thing from him, not a card or a thank you. I am not at all pleased as that is a lack of manners.

He's probably run out of answers Daisy and frankly, I see no answers coming from him which could in any way mitigate his guilt.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2018, 04:58:19 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Daisy

Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #77 on: January 07, 2018, 08:33:20 AM »
He's probably run out of answers Daisy and frankly, I see no answers coming from him which could in any way mitigate his guilt.

I received a letter from Mark yesterday which was written on 14th December!  By the writing on the envelope it appears it was one of the free letters prisoners are given a week but the prison forgot to put a stamp on it. Mark answered your question to say that his father made him sole beneficiary and executor of his will. In normal circumstances the executor could obtain the BT bill but due to Markís position there must be restrictions in place.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #78 on: January 07, 2018, 05:35:38 PM »
These days ones location is easily checked from bank statements.

This has already been pointed out. I don't recall what I did last Wednesday after work  as I have no plans on Wednesdays, however on checking my bank statement it says I was in Marks and Spencers (branch included) at 6.34pm which would tie in with my driving Home from work and popping in for food. UNLESS someone had my card and ID.... on this occasion I believe I did use my card and bought food on the way home from work, due to the fact I still have my card and no one has my ID...

I am not convinced Mark is innocent.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Online John

Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #79 on: January 08, 2018, 02:09:30 AM »
I received a letter from Mark yesterday which was written on 14th December!  By the writing on the envelope it appears it was one of the free letters prisoners are given a week but the prison forgot to put a stamp on it. Mark answered your question to say that his father made him sole beneficiary and executor of his will. In normal circumstances the executor could obtain the BT bill but due to Markís position there must be restrictions in place.

Thank you Daisy, I will reply later.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Angelo222

Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #80 on: January 10, 2018, 12:33:57 PM »
This has already been pointed out. I don't recall what I did last Wednesday after work  as I have no plans on Wednesdays, however on checking my bank statement it says I was in Marks and Spencers (branch included) at 6.34pm which would tie in with my driving Home from work and popping in for food. UNLESS someone had my card and ID.... on this occasion I believe I did use my card and bought food on the way home from work, due to the fact I still have my card and no one has my ID...

I am not convinced Mark is innocent.

There are far too many inconsistencies in this case for it to be a miscarriage of justice imo.  The notion that some third party could have entered the property and killed Sami, taken him outside and tried to burn his remains, dig a large hole in the garden, attempt a burial using homemade mortar to seal the grave etc etc and all this just metres from other houses is preposterous.  Was it also just one big coincidence that Mark Alexander took it upon himself in his father's absence to return to the family home and order and pay for a small load of premix concrete and have it wheelbarrowed in so to completely seal the grave?  So laughable if it wasn't so sad!  I have no doubt whatsoever as to his guilt.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2018, 12:39:02 PM by Angelo222 »
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Online John

Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #81 on: January 10, 2018, 06:53:19 PM »
There are far too many inconsistencies in this case for it to be a miscarriage of justice imo.  The notion that some third party could have entered the property and killed Sami, taken him outside and tried to burn his remains, dig a large hole in the garden, attempt a burial using homemade mortar to seal the grave etc etc and all this just metres from other houses is preposterous.  Was it also just one big coincidence that Mark Alexander took it upon himself in his father's absence to return to the family home and order and pay for a small load of premix concrete and have it wheelbarrowed in so to completely seal the grave?  So laughable if it wasn't so sad!  I have no doubt whatsoever as to his guilt.

I feel Daisy has hit a brick wall but not for the lack of effort on her part.  I think Mark has just run out of excuses.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. John Lamberton exposes malfeasance by public officials.
Check out my website >   http://johnlamberton.webs.com/index.htm?no_redirect=true     The truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Daisy

Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #82 on: January 10, 2018, 07:14:10 PM »
I feel Daisy has hit a brick wall but not for the lack of effort on her part.  I think Mark has just run out of excuses.

I do have more items to post but it is just finding the time to do it as they are quite long. I think once we have all the information from Mark and there are no more questions to be answered we can then come to our own decisions regarding guilt or innocence.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #83 on: January 10, 2018, 09:00:05 PM »
I do have more items to post but it is just finding the time to do it as they are quite long. I think once we have all the information from Mark and there are no more questions to be answered we can then come to our own decisions regarding guilt or innocence.

Daisy I do admire your humanity and  I do appreciate the hard work and the many hours you have spent to bring this to the forum for us to read about and discuss. Thank you.

 From  what I have read already, and the answers given, I have already made up my mind, I agree the jury go it right. Mark was solely or with an accomplice/s is guilty.

However, what I find quite disturbing is. If as you say, the police and procurator fiscal office is withholding evidence which could prove Mark's innocence then this should be brought through the appeal court and his MP and the home secretary should be involved.  Are his lawyers up for the challenge or just accepting the verdict knowing their client is 'innocent'?
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Angelo222

Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #84 on: February 24, 2018, 11:34:59 AM »
Has Mark accepted his guilt now?
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Daisy

Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #85 on: February 24, 2018, 11:36:57 AM »
Has Mark accepted his guilt now?

No he hasn't.  I have just posted some more information which is waiting approval by a moderator.  Lots more to come.

Offline Stephanie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2131
  • Total likes: 49
  • I was conned by Simon Hall & many others
Re: The murder of Samuel Alexander - Serious Case Review.
« Reply #86 on: April 28, 2018, 07:18:59 PM »
Has Mark accepted his guilt now?

Someone has most certainly done a great job of exposing his guilt
"When flying monkeys come calling, just click your ruby slippers together and remember that even narcs can be defeated once you know the truth"