Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.

[Brietta]

Your point was of no such thing. You dismissed other posters statements about the dodgy timeline, by giving yours! even with or withour approximations
I challenged that and well.. as it turns out,

"So we can say with certainty the TAPAS group had no set times or schedule for checking their children via listening system on any evening or before they left the UK".

I don't have an agenda as you put it, you just cannot hold your argument in this debate.

If you are going to make bold statements to 'rubbish' others who disagree with you, then you should be prepared to be challenged.

When is the penny going to drop that the only timeline of any importance in Madeleine's case is that of an abductor.

[stephen25000]

When is the penny going to drop that the only timeline of any importance in Madeleine's case is that of an abductor.

You asked me the other day to post opinions, as that.

What you typed is an opinion.

[Brietta]

You asked me the other day to post opinions, as that.

What you typed is an opinion.

No ... it is a statement of fact.

Neither the McCanns or their companions are either suspects or persons of interest in Madeleine's case.  That simply means that whatever you and others get from poring over the timeline of events as it affects them is pointless.

Thanks to Portuguese leaks, it appears that an Ocean Club employee might  be in a position to assist Scotland Yard with an account of his whereabouts and those of others at around the appropriate time. 

That appears to be the timeline which is of interest to Scotland Yard and seems to be upsetting to the old guard.

[stephen25000]

No ... it is a statement of fact.

Neither the McCanns or their companions are either suspects or persons of interest in Madeleine's case.  That simply means that whatever you and others get from poring over the timeline of events as it affects them is pointless.

Thanks to Portuguese leaks, it appears that an Ocean Club employee might  be in a position to assist Scotland Yard with an account of his whereabouts and those of others at around the appropriate time. 

That appears to be the timeline which is of interest to Scotland Yard and seems to be upsetting to the old guard.

Perhaps you would like to name the SY source for this.

[Brietta]

Perhaps you would like to name the SY source for this.

That really is a decidedly odd post from someone who has been posting on McCann boards for any length of time ... you've been reading exactly the same cites I have ... the fact you chose to interpret them to suit yourself is entirely a matter for you.

[stephen25000]

No ... it is a statement of fact.

Neither the McCanns or their companions are either suspects or persons of interest in Madeleine's case.  That simply means that whatever you and others get from poring over the timeline of events as it affects them is pointless.

Thanks to Portuguese leaks, it appears that an Ocean Club employee might  be in a position to assist Scotland Yard with an account of his whereabouts and those of others at around the appropriate time. 

That appears to be the timeline which is of interest to Scotland Yard and seems to be upsetting to the old guard.

P.S. Brietta,  the crime , if one occurred in the apartment, remains still undetermined.

I will let you work out the implications of that for yourself.

[stephen25000]

That really is a decidedly odd post from someone who has been posting on McCann boards for any length of time ... you've been reading exactly the same cites I have ... the fact you chose to interpret them to suit yourself is entirely a matter for you.

That is precisely what you are doing.

Such are floundering in their efforts to pin someone  for Madeleine's disappearance.

They may have many files, but you at stretching credulity if you believe they are close to solving this case.

[ferryman]

P.S. Brietta,  the crime , if one occurred in the apartment, remains still undetermined.

I will let you work out the implications of that for yourself.

Implications, of course, needing to be separated from wild and baseless accusations or imaginings ....

[stephen25000]

Implications, of course, needing to be separated from wild and baseless accusations or imaginings ....

Such as abduction ferryman.

[Mr Gray]

P.S. Brietta,  the crime , if one occurred in the apartment, remains still undetermined.

I will let you work out the implications of that for yourself.

Maddie was abducted or murdered by a person unknown according to SY

[stephen25000]

Maddie was abducted or murdered by a person unknown according to SY

Now we have murdered...

Is that from BHH Dave?


With his Freudian Slip ?

And if so, then the dog's alerted correctly.

[Mr Gray]

Now we have murdered...

Is that from BHH Dave?


With his Freudian Slip ?

And if so, then the dog's alerted correctly.

of course its possible maddie was murdered and if you understood the alerts you would realise that this would not confirm the alerts

[slartibartfast]

of course its possible maddie was murdered and if you understood the alerts you would realise that this would not confirm the alerts

If her body was proved to have been in 5a or clothing belonging to someone who handled her body was proved to have been in 5a, it would confirm the alerts.

[ferryman]

If her body was proved to have been in 5a or clothing belonging to someone who handled her body was proved to have been in 5a, it would confirm the alerts.

No it wouldn't.

All it would prove is that a dog barked where a body had been.

[Robittybob1]

No it wouldn't.

All it would prove is that a dog barked where a body had been.

Something like that.