Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.

[stephen25000]

Did Ocean Club warn their guest about the spate of burglaries going on?

The McCann's locked their apartment during the day.

have you forgotten Rob ?

[Robittybob1]

The McCann's locked their apartment during the day.

have you forgotten Rob ?

You told you that?  So now you believe Kate and Gerry do you?

[stephen25000]

You told you that?  So now you believe Kate and Gerry do you?

Are you calling them liars Rob ???

Try reading your first question again.

[Benice]

No I didn't miss approximate at all. I read it with interest because of the contradictions. The point being made was THEY had no set scheduled time.  Your post tried to evidence there was. but by putting in the appx  it threw that argument.

So we can say with certainty the TAPAS group had no set times or schedule for checking their children via listening system on any evening or before they left the UK.


"The McCanns and their friends did no different to thousands of other parents"


From those thousands of parents how many lost children to 'abductors' AKA gang of paedophiles, who then went out a few days later knowing their child was abducted and 'celebrated' their birthday, balloons, flowers and happy faces knowing their child  could be being tortured  among other things. THEN instead of searching for their daughter went on a 'tour', set up a fund, got top lawyers and PR firms to 'support' them... if they did nothing wrong? You got facts and figures for that?

My point re the timing was to show that it was approx every 30 mins in Madeleines case and every 15 mins in JT's children's case on the 3rd May.  So those claims were basically correct.

You can make a case against anyone if you deliberately only select anything that suits your agenda. and ignore everything that contradicts your view  - especially when you take stuff out of context in order to give it a different meaning.     The latter being a favourite pastime of some sceptics IMO. 

[stephen25000]

My point re the timing was to show that it was approx every 30 mins in Madeleines case and every 15 mins in JT's children's case on the 3rd May.  So those claims were basically correct.

You can make a case against anyone if you deliberately only select anything that suits your agenda. and ignore everything that contradicts your view  - especially when you take stuff out of context in order to give it a different meaning.     The latter being a favourite pastime of some sceptics IMO.

You have no idea of how well the children were checked to see if they were OK.

[Robittybob1]

Are you calling them liars Rob ???

Try reading your first question again.

I asked you whether you believed them.  That is no reflection on the McCanns but an assessment of your views.

[stephen25000]

I asked you whether you believed them.  That is no reflection on the McCanns but an assessment of your views.

I'll give you a clue.

At the start the Mccann's claimed  the apartment was locked in the evenings, then it became unlocked.


There is no automatic right to believe the mccann's.

[Robittybob1]

I'll give you a clue.

At the start the Mccann's claimed  the apartment was locked in the evenings, then it became unlocked.


There is no automatic right to believe the mccann's.

Are you calling them liars Stephen ???

[Robittybob1]

I think Amaral should lay low for I get the feeling the current PJ heads are not pleased at his antics. 
You only need to look at the things he says in this interview and you can see he doesn't really have a clue.

In the interview he points out that the book is written to protest his removal from the case.  Now looking at his understanding of the timeline I can see why.  He should be arrested for breaking the duty of Reserve.

[stephen25000]

Are you calling them liars Stephen ???

I will call them what I wish.

So Rob, at the start, the apartment was locked, then it became unlocked.

Only one is true.

[Robittybob1]

I will call them what I wish.

So Rob, at the start, the apartment was locked, then it became unlocked.

Only one is true.

It is only on one person's statement, the McCanns didn't make a joint statement like Jez and Bridget did.
In the case of the McCanns you can't call them both liars for only one changed their statement.

[stephen25000]

It is only on one person's statement, the McCanns didn't make a joint statement like Jez and Bridget did.
In the case of the McCanns you can call them both liars for only one changed their statement.

Did they leave the apartment together at the same time ?

Had they predetermined their childcare arrangements ?

[Robittybob1]

Did they leave the apartment together at the same time ?

Had they predetermined their childcare arrangements ?

Pointless arguments sorry.

[stephen25000]

Pointless arguments sorry.

No, they are entirely relevant.

[Miss Taken Identity]

My point re the timing was to show that it was approx every 30 mins in Madeleines case and every 15 mins in JT's children's case on the 3rd May.  So those claims were basically correct.

You can make a case against anyone if you deliberately only select anything that suits your agenda. and ignore everything that contradicts your view  - especially when you take stuff out of context in order to give it a different meaning.     The latter being a favourite pastime of some sceptics IMO.

Your point was of no such thing. You dismissed other posters statements about the dodgy timeline, by giving yours! even with or withour approximations
I challenged that and well.. as it turns out,

"So we can say with certainty the TAPAS group had no set times or schedule for checking their children via listening system on any evening or before they left the UK".

I don't have an agenda as you put it, you just cannot hold your argument in this debate.

If you are going to make bold statements to 'rubbish' others who disagree with you, then you should be prepared to be challenged.