Author Topic: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.  (Read 52822 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #195 on: March 17, 2017, 05:01:58 PM »
If her body was proved to have been in 5a or clothing belonging to someone who handled her body was proved to have been in 5a, it would confirm the alerts.

It wouldn't
Think again
Her body would have had to have been there for an hour or more

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #196 on: March 17, 2017, 05:06:56 PM »
Two sceptics who do not understand the alerts

How revealing

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #197 on: March 17, 2017, 05:30:14 PM »
It wouldn't
Think again
Her body would have had to have been there for an hour or more
That is why GA initially implicated the friends but I don't recall him making them all arguidos either.
So was that point the main reason he was fired from the case?

Does he expound on the reason he was fired from the position? 
« Last Edit: March 17, 2017, 05:32:26 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #198 on: March 17, 2017, 05:51:57 PM »
That is why GA initially implicated the friends but I don't recall him making them all arguidos either.
So was that point the main reason he was fired from the case?

Does he expound on the reason he was fired from the position?
I believe he was removed from the case for criticising the uk police

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #199 on: March 17, 2017, 07:04:16 PM »
I believe he was removed from the case for criticising the uk police

Indeed for interfering in the case.

They should have advised, not interfered.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #200 on: March 17, 2017, 07:13:00 PM »
I believe he was removed from the case for criticising the uk police

It was quite telling how the UK police lost interest in helping once the McCanns left Portugal.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #201 on: March 17, 2017, 07:45:26 PM »
It was quite telling how the UK police lost interest in helping once the McCanns left Portugal.

afaiac the uk police did not agree with the targetting of the mccanns....as the present situation shows

Offline barrier

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #202 on: March 17, 2017, 08:00:03 PM »
It wouldn't
Think again
Her body would have had to have been there for an hour or more

That time is for an adult no one has been able to confirm or deny if a child the age of Madeliene produces cadaver alert quicker because of the obviously undeveloped body or is the time constant no matter the age of a cadaver.
For obvious reasons it could easily be suspected that it would be all but impossible to confirm/deny it.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2017, 08:02:43 PM by barrier »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #203 on: March 17, 2017, 08:04:22 PM »
That time is for an adult no one has been able to confirm or deny if a child the age of Madeliene produces cadaver alert quicker because of the obviously undeveloped body or is the time constant no matter the age of a cadaver.
For obvious reasons it could easily be suspected that it would be all but impossible to confirm/deny it.


as no one can confirm or deny...... then the dog alerts would NOT be confirmed.....OK

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #204 on: March 17, 2017, 08:06:04 PM »
That time is for an adult no one has been able to confirm or deny if a child the age of Madeliene produces cadaver alert quicker because of the obviously undeveloped body or is the time constant no matter the age of a cadaver.
For obvious reasons it could easily be suspected that it would be all but impossible to confirm/deny it.
I would imagine the lighter a body the longer it would have to remain there.  This is because it would cool faster and hence decompose slower.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #205 on: March 17, 2017, 08:08:58 PM »
I would imagine the lighter a body the longer it would have to remain there.  This is because it would cool faster and hence decompose slower.

Initial body temp is the same is it not? so I wonder if the starting point is the same then decomposition could be the same, straying off topic I fear.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #206 on: March 17, 2017, 08:12:07 PM »
Initial body temp is the same is it not? so I wonder if the starting point is the same then decomposition could be the same, straying off topic I fear.


until we know for  a fact no claim re confirmation of teh alerts can be made

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #207 on: March 17, 2017, 08:24:07 PM »
Initial body temp is the same is it not? so I wonder if the starting point is the same then decomposition could be the same, straying off topic I fear.
Not really it would depend on the cause of death.  When animals are about to die (human animals would be the same) their body temperature would decline.
If two people were shot point blank (no cooling prior to death), the smaller would cool faster than the heavier (as the surface area to mass ratio would be higher).

For those who think Madeleine died in the apartment, they would need to consider the following questions.
But what did Madeleine die from and how rapidly did it happen?  Did she die in her sleep?  It is hard to say how much cooling occurred prior to death.
Did she fall and die instantly?  Did she get picked up immediately or was she left on the cold floor?
Being left in her bed for hours doesn't seem like an option as there was no cadaver odour found on her bed clothes.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2017, 08:33:39 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #208 on: March 17, 2017, 11:03:26 PM »
When is the penny going to drop that the only timeline of any importance in Madeleine's case is that of an abductor.

What abductor would this be then Brietta? There is no evidence of abductor so no penny to drop as it were. The McCanns and supporters are still selling the same ole cr@p. Not to help find their daughter ,no, not at all , this smoke and mirror is set up to protect their reputations that is what this is all about, and has been from the beginning. Fact is this: Last independant witness to see young Madeleine alive was 5.30 pm. police are alerted sometime  around 11 pm. in-between we have  people coming and going forgetting who saw who when and for how long.Talk about farce!
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral interviewed after the Appeal Court decision.
« Reply #209 on: March 17, 2017, 11:10:05 PM »
What abductor would this be then Brietta? There is no evidence of abductor so no penny to drop as it were. The McCanns and supporters are still selling the same ole cr@p. Not to help find their daughter ,no, not at all , this smoke and mirror is set up to protect their reputations that is what this is all about, and has been from the beginning. Fact is this: Last independant witness to see young Madeleine alive was 5.30 pm. police are alerted sometime  around 11 pm. in-between we have  people coming and going forgetting who saw who when and for how long.Talk about farce!

when you supply proof of parental involvement or proof of maddie leaving the apartment on her own then the possibility of an abductor exists