Author Topic: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?  (Read 98797 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #420 on: April 09, 2017, 06:01:06 PM »
Let's have some evidence that OG have actually questioned the McCann's and the rest of the group.

Speculation , not included.


Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #421 on: April 09, 2017, 06:02:14 PM »
Pure speculation.  Keywords - would, would be unthinkable.  Says it all.

yes it says it all...when I post opinion I do not post it as fact as you have

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #422 on: April 09, 2017, 06:03:41 PM »
Let's have some evidence that OG have actually questioned the McCann's and the rest of the group.

Speculation , not included.

evidence of normal police practice......SY do not have an accurated statement from the mccanns ....they would absolutely have to interview them...imo

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #423 on: April 09, 2017, 06:04:10 PM »
As with most conspiracy theorists you're seeing only what you want to see and when challenged to come up with any sort of logical or plausible reason to support your conspiracy theory you demur.
What conspiracy?  Conspiracy between whom?

OG does not have free reign to investigate as if the disappearance occurred in the UK.  Check Brietta's sig.

The remit puts the McCanns off limits.  As to why, pure speculation.
What's up, old man?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #424 on: April 09, 2017, 06:05:23 PM »
yes it says it all...when I post opinion I do not post it as fact as you have
SC posts opinion as law.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #425 on: April 09, 2017, 06:06:28 PM »
What conspiracy?  Conspiracy between whom?

OG does not have free reign to investigate as if the disappearance occurred in the UK.  Check Brietta's sig.

The remit puts the McCanns off limits.  As to why, pure speculation.

you are continuing to post opinion as fact.....your opnion is pure speculation

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #426 on: April 09, 2017, 06:07:26 PM »
yes it says it all...when I post opinion I do not post it as fact as you have
The content of the remit is fact, not my opinion.  Perhaps you too would wish to chide Brietta for using the relevant part of the remit in her sig?
What's up, old man?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #427 on: April 09, 2017, 06:07:58 PM »
evidence of normal police practice......SY do not have an accurated statement from the mccanns ....they would absolutely have to interview them...imo

So now you are an expert in  Police practice. 8**8:/:

I asked for evidence, not your opinion.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #428 on: April 09, 2017, 06:08:56 PM »

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #429 on: April 09, 2017, 06:21:34 PM »
The content of the remit is fact, not my opinion.  Perhaps you too would wish to chide Brietta for using the relevant part of the remit in her sig?
The content of the remit is fact but your claim that it puts the McCanns off limits is your interpretation.. not fact

You are posting your opinion as fact
« Last Edit: April 09, 2017, 06:29:36 PM by davel »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #430 on: April 09, 2017, 06:28:44 PM »
The content of the remit is fact, not my opinion.  Perhaps you too would wish to chide Brietta for using the relevant part of the remit in her sig?
Interesting!   This is what Brietta's signature states "The remit of Operation Grange is to investigate ...  "(as if the abduction occurred in the UK)".   
Are the McCanns involved with the abduction of their own child?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #431 on: April 09, 2017, 06:31:24 PM »
What conspiracy?  Conspiracy between whom?

OG does not have free reign to investigate as if the disappearance occurred in the UK.  Check Brietta's sig.

The remit puts the McCanns off limits.  As to why, pure speculation.
I asked you this question before and you ignored it - do you think it's possible the McCanns are involved in a cover up involving the hiding of their dead child's body?

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #432 on: April 09, 2017, 06:34:26 PM »
Here is the Operation Grange remit:

Quote
Op Grange Remit

The support and expertise proffered by the Commissioner will be provided by the Homicide & Serious Crime Command - SCD1. 

The activity, in the first instance, will be that of an ‘investigative review’.  This will entail a review of the whole of the investigation(s) which have been conducted in to the circumstances of Madeleine McCann’s disappearance.

The focus of the review will be of the material held by three main stakeholders (and in the following order of primacy);

•   The Portuguese Law Enforcement agencies.
•   UK Law Enforcement agencies,
•   Other private investigative agencies/staff and organisations.

The investigative review is intended to collate, record and analyse what has gone before. 

It is to examine the case and seek to determine, (as if the abduction occurred in the UK) what additional, new investigative approaches we would take and which can assist the Portuguese authorities in progressing the matter. Whilst ordinarily a review has no investigative remit whatsoever- the scale and extent of this enquiry cannot permit for such an approach. It will take too long to progress to any “action stage” if activity is given wholly and solely to a review process.

The ‘investigative review’ will be conducted with transparency, openness and thoroughness.

The work will be overseen through the Gold Group management structure, which will also manage the central relationships with other key stakeholders and provide continuing oversight and direction to the investigative remit.

End


Which suggests, to me, that both the PJ and Scotland Yard are fully convinced Kate and Gerry have no case to answer, either from a perspective of direct involvement in Madeleine's disappearance, or from the perspective of 'neglect'.

That very much mirrors the conclusion of the Portuguese prosecutors. 

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #433 on: April 09, 2017, 06:36:48 PM »
Here is the Operation Grange remit:

Which suggests, to me, that both the PJ and Scotland Yard are fully convinced Kate and Gerry have no case to answer, either from a perspective of direct involvement in Madeleine's disappearance, or from the perspective of 'neglect'.

That very much mirrors the conclusion of the Portuguese prosecutors.

The original case was shelved due to lack of evidence of anything that could result in a prosecution.

It hasn't changed.

The crime, if one occurred remains undetermined.


Offline slartibartfast

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #434 on: April 09, 2017, 06:40:12 PM »
No problem.

Which part do you disagree on Slarti ?

Friendship is what causes one person to support or protect another and any organisation that facilitates friendship is liable to find itself tainted by any shady dealing associated with friends who are members.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.