So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?

[G-Unit]

Post the Supreme Court Decision?

Raise awkward anomalies (of that decision) such as explaining what, if they correctly surmised that Kate and Gerry are culpable in Madeleine's disappearance, Kate and Gerry are supposed to have done with 'the body' for 3 weeks between 'seeing her off' and hiring a car to take her somewhere?

I think you misunderstand. The Supreme Court judges were very clear that they were not making any claims about the McCann's guilt or innocence, they surmised nothing;

Page 69
It must be reminded that, in the present case, the issue isn't the appellants' penal liability, in other words their innocence or their guilt concerning the facts leading to the disappearance of her daughter doesn't have to be appreciated here.

[kizzy]

IMO I think Goncalo Amaral came to a sensible conclusion at that time in the investigation. As he has said numerous times, the investigation was not allowed to run it's course and test certain theories to the end. His hypothesis may have changed had other information come to light.

How is that so hard to understand?  I think he was close with his theory and allowed to carry on his investigation unhindered, would have uncovered more detail of what happened.

[carlymichelle]

IMO I think Goncalo Amaral came to a sensible conclusion at that time in the investigation. As he has said numerous times, the investigation was not allowed to run it's course and test certain theories to the end. His hypothesis may have changed had other information come to light.

How is that so hard to understand?  I think he was close with his theory and allowed to carry on his investigation unhindered, would have uncovered more detail of what happened.

mcann supporters dont accept that they believe everything the media tells them

[Alfie]

mcann supporters dont accept that they believe everything the media tells them

What was that about lumping all sceptics into one group with the exact same thoughts and opinions?  Oh dear....

[Mr Gray]

Getting back on track I hope the McCanns become more forthright bin defending themselves re all the lies told about them and the case

I certainly would

[Brietta]

Please post ON TOPIC, thank you.

[stephen25000]

That's straightforward.

Time for the Mccann's to pay up

[stephen25000]

Are you agreeing that Madeleine's disappearance can be accounted for by several scenarios, including accidental death, and there is no evidence to raise one theory above any other ?

[ferryman]

Trouble is that on-topic posts (at least by me) tend to be removed.  Post the Supreme Court decision there ought to be an inquest into how two judgements (superseding the first-instance judgment) both were passed by judges clearly stuck where most McCann-detractors have been stuck for the best part of the last 10 years, the (now dubbed 'interim' report) of convicted torture Tavares Almeida; when both the PJ Final report and (particularly) the prosecutors' archiving dispatch supersede it. 

Most surprising. 

[ferryman]

Are you agreeing that Madeleine's disappearance can be accounted for by several scenarios, including accidental death, and there is no evidence to raise one theory above any other ?

Why would anyone agree with that?

When the PJ ruled out woke and wandered.

And when the prosecutors made plain Madeleine was abducted?

[stephen25000]

Why would anyone agree with that?

When the PJ ruled out woke and wandered.

And when the prosecutors made plain Madeleine was abducted?

They gave opinions, they had no facts.

There was nae evidence.

P.S. When referring to a statement, give the full one, or a link, and not your 'interpretation'.

[G-Unit]

Trouble is that on-topic posts (at least by me) tend to be removed.  Post the Supreme Court decision there ought to be an inquest into how two judgements (superseding the first-instance judgment) both were passed by judges clearly stuck where most McCann-detractors have been stuck for the best part of the last 10 years, the (now dubbed 'interim' report) of convicted torture Tavares Almeida; when both the PJ Final report and (particularly) the prosecutors' archiving dispatch supersede it. 

Most surprising.

If you read the Supreme Court decision you will realise that they paid quite a bit of attention to the archiving dispatch.

[Mr Gray]

They gave opinions, they had no facts.

There was nae evidence.

P.S. When referring to a statement, give the full one, or a link, and not your 'interpretation'.

The archiving report ruled out woke and wandered
Those with ALL the FACTS ruled it out

[stephen25000]

The archiving report ruled out woke and wandered
Those with ALL the FACTS ruled it out

They didn't have all the facts.

They didn't have the evidence to prosecute anyone.

Perhaps you would care to cite what the report actually stated.

Meanwhile, all Madeleine's disappearance shows, is that she disappeared.  It doesn't place one theory above any other.

[Alice Purjorick]

Trouble is that on-topic posts (at least by me) tend to be removed.  Post the Supreme Court decision there ought to be an inquest into how two judgements (superseding the first-instance judgment) both were passed by judges clearly stuck where most McCann-detractors have been stuck for the best part of the last 10 years, the (now dubbed 'interim' report) of convicted torture Tavares Almeida; when both the PJ Final report and (particularly) the prosecutors' archiving dispatch supersede it. 

Most surprising.

One needs a "coroner" and witnesses for that. Who do you suggest and how do you suggest it is aproached?