Author Topic: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?  (Read 98791 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #615 on: April 10, 2017, 08:15:18 PM »
Don't forget to record the wind direction and velocity too.
On the food front I will stick with pie and mash with green liquor served in the traditional manner  8(>((

shouldnt that be wind speed....scalers and vectors

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #616 on: April 10, 2017, 08:21:59 PM »
Don't forget to record the wind direction and velocity too.
On the food front I will stick with pie and mash with green liquor served in the traditional manner  8(>((

Don't forget a bowl of Gagh, and a cask of Blood Wine. *&*%£

Offline Robittybob1

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #617 on: April 10, 2017, 08:37:09 PM »
Don't forget a bowl of Gagh, and a cask of Blood Wine. *&*%£
Raise your glasses and let's toast to Kate McCann for surviving Goncalo's onslaught.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #618 on: April 10, 2017, 08:40:37 PM »
Raise your glasses and let's toast to Kate McCann for surviving Goncalo's onslaught.

Nah.

It is Amaral, who survived their onslaught. 8((()*/

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #619 on: April 10, 2017, 08:48:12 PM »
I'm afraid that just trying to tag Portugal with certain behaviour is rather trite.

Perhaps you can remind me of which members of the PJ have served a sentence for 'torturing' Cipriano, the convicted child murderer and convicted liar, who of course had her sentence extended.

She, of course gave multiple varied accounts of what happened to her.

Strawman!

Actually, a double strawman.

The Portuguese courts found it proved that Leonor Cipriano had been tortured in police custody, but did not convict any of the policemen, proven to be with her at the time of the torture, because Leonor's torturers had had the, (ahem) foresight! to put a bag over her head before they tortured her, so she could not identify her aggressors.

Leonor is not a particularly well-educated woman, subjected to a terrifying ordeal, while temporarily, and very nearly permanently, deprived of one of her vital senses, sight.

And she promptly had her sentence increased because she is (deemed) not to have got her facts entirely straight about the details of that terrifying ordeal.

The just (and logical) result of it being proved she was tortured is that her conviction should have been quashed. 

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #620 on: April 10, 2017, 08:51:38 PM »
Strawman!

Actually, a double strawman.

The Portuguese courts found it proved that Leonor Cipriano had been tortured in police custody, but did not convict any of the policemen, proven to be with her at the time of the torture, because Leonor's torturers had had the, (ahem) foresight! to put a bag over her head before they tortured her, so she could not identify her aggressors.

Leonor is not a particularly well-educated woman, subjected to a terrifying ordeal, while temporarily, and very nearly permanently, deprived of one of her vital senses, sight.

And she promptly had her sentence increased because she is (deemed) not to have got her facts entirely straight about the details of that terrifying ordeal.

The just (and logical) result of it being proved she was tortured is that her conviction should have been quashed.

T.B.'s.


The woman is a convicted murderer and liar.


As to why you support such a person, well that is another matter.

However, hardly difficult to deduce.


ferryman

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #621 on: April 10, 2017, 08:53:31 PM »
T.B.'s.


The woman is a convicted murderer and liar.


As to why you support such a person, well that is another matter.

However, hardly difficult to deduce.

TB's?

Tony Bennett's?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #622 on: April 10, 2017, 08:55:57 PM »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #623 on: April 10, 2017, 08:59:40 PM »
Nah.

It is Amaral, who survived their onslaught. 8((()*/
Let's toast to the good fight.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #624 on: April 10, 2017, 09:00:40 PM »
Don't forget to record the wind direction and velocity too.
On the food front I will stick with pie and mash with green liquor served in the traditional manner  8(>((
I have been recording wind direction and speed, plus cloud cover at both my 1.37pm and 10pm checks, from 30/3/17.  Before that it was just the mid-day check from Nov 16 until I realised I need the night-time check as well.
What's up, old man?

Offline slartibartfast

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #625 on: April 10, 2017, 09:01:26 PM »
Track back to reply no. 566 and you'll find I've supplied the cites as promised, but after you replied to my post.

You missed "The most plausible explanation..."
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #626 on: April 10, 2017, 09:46:18 PM »
I'm afraid that just trying to tag Portugal with certain behaviour is rather trite.

Perhaps you can remind me of which members of the PJ have served a sentence for 'torturing' Cipriano, the convicted child murderer and convicted liar, who of course had her sentence extended.

She, of course gave multiple varied accounts of what happened to her.

this is what Amnesty International had to say about the torture of Cipriano


Portugal Human Rights

Torture and other ill-treatment

On 22 May the Criminal Court of Faro issued its sentence in the case of the torture of Leonor Cipriano. The court recognized that she had been tortured in police custody in 2004, but acquitted all three police officers, claiming that it was impossible to identify exactly who had been responsible

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #627 on: April 10, 2017, 10:08:29 PM »
shouldnt that be wind speed....scalers and vectors

No. I want the vector quantity which is what I have asked for. The scalar quantity is NBG for what needs to be determined.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #628 on: April 10, 2017, 10:14:04 PM »

No. I want the vector quantity which is what I have asked for. The scalar quantity is NBG for what needs to be determined.

i think you are blagging...a swirling wind would have speed but next to no velocity....

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #629 on: April 10, 2017, 10:41:12 PM »
i think you are blagging...a swirling wind would have speed but next to no velocity....
 

You seem to be ignoring omega.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey