Author Topic: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?  (Read 98769 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #675 on: April 11, 2017, 06:15:28 PM »
That would make no difference whatsoever. You seem to think the case rested on whether Amaral's opinion was right. It wasn't. The case was about whether he could express his opinion or not.
I thought it was a damages case, that's what we were constantly being told - that it was nothing to do with libel, remember?

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #676 on: April 11, 2017, 06:24:03 PM »
I thought it was a damages case, that's what we were constantly being told - that it was nothing to do with libel, remember?

Yeah we the septics remember,  how could we be allowed to forget.. It started off as damages to parents reputation  to he search for Maddie, then the 'fan club' descided it was a libe trial to find The McCanns innocent ..

BUT after all these posts the SC found Amaral had no case to answer regarding his freedom of speech claim. As far as we know SC havn't changed their mind or had their minds changed for them.
Simples. 8)-)))
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline jassi

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #677 on: April 11, 2017, 06:27:31 PM »
When appropriate, I just refer to it as the McCann v Amaral case and find that avoids all trivial argument.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #678 on: April 11, 2017, 06:53:27 PM »
I thought it was a damages case, that's what we were constantly being told - that it was nothing to do with libel, remember?

Freedom of expression v right to a good name and reputation.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #679 on: April 11, 2017, 07:02:02 PM »
Freedom of expression v right to a good name and reputation.
So it was a libel trial after all then!

Offline Robittybob1

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #680 on: April 11, 2017, 07:38:36 PM »
That would make no difference whatsoever. You seem to think the case rested on whether Amaral's opinion was right. It wasn't. The case was about whether he could express his opinion or not.
That's what I mean, he has been allowed to express his opinion and now he should be man enough to admit he was wrong.   To pay all the McCanns legal fees out of the gains from his book which he can now see was a theory along the wrong path.  I believe that would be a great move enabling him to ease the tension between the McCanns and himself and opening up the opportunity to really provide another scenario explaining Smith-man.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #681 on: April 11, 2017, 07:46:23 PM »
That's what I mean, he has been allowed to express his opinion and now he should be man enough to admit he was wrong.   To pay all the McCanns legal fees out of the gains from his book which he can now see was a theory along the wrong path.  I believe that would be a great move enabling him to ease the tension between the McCanns and himself and opening up the opportunity to really provide another scenario explaining Smith-man.

His theory remains on the table Rob.

Try again.

As to apologizing, that is what the McCann's should do, to all those tax payers in Portugal and the UK , whose money has been used, as a result of their inability to protect their children.


Offline G-Unit

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #682 on: April 11, 2017, 07:52:09 PM »
That's what I mean, he has been allowed to express his opinion and now he should be man enough to admit he was wrong.   To pay all the McCanns legal fees out of the gains from his book which he can now see was a theory along the wrong path.  I believe that would be a great move enabling him to ease the tension between the McCanns and himself and opening up the opportunity to really provide another scenario explaining Smith-man.

Looking at it another way, the McCanns have not been allowed to take his money and ruin him. Why he should do them any favours escapes me, but I do enjoy your fantasies.  8(0(*
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #683 on: April 11, 2017, 07:54:18 PM »
Looking at it another way, the McCanns have not been allowed to take his money and ruin him. Why he should do them any favours escapes me, but I do enjoy your fantasies.  8(0(*

What do you suppose Amaral did to the McCanns with his book?

Certainly not tell the truth.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #684 on: April 11, 2017, 08:00:34 PM »
Looking at it another way, the McCanns have not been allowed to take his money and ruin him. Why he should do them any favours escapes me, but I do enjoy your fantasies.  8(0(*
With the animosity settled he would be allowed to publish another book in England and hence reap the benefits of the truce. 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #685 on: April 11, 2017, 09:04:22 PM »
The Supreme-Court judges may, yet, wake up to the fact that they have made a calamitous mistake.
yes ...they may realise that the Mccanns have been cleared

Offline Erngath

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #686 on: April 11, 2017, 10:30:52 PM »
Apologies for this post as it is off topic but every sceptic post  is liked by "Kipper".A busy little poster is kipper. ?{)(**
Well done Kipper.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #687 on: April 11, 2017, 10:37:43 PM »
Apologies for this post as it is off topic but every sceptic post  is liked by "Kipper".A busy little poster is kipper. ?{)(**
Well done Kipper.

It goes a little bit like this me dearyos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dCdT6tN3WY
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #688 on: April 11, 2017, 10:38:39 PM »
Apologies for this post as it is off topic but every sceptic post  is liked by "Kipper".A busy little poster is kipper. ?{)(**
Well done Kipper.
KipperTotal posts: 0Total Likes Given: 12031

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #689 on: April 11, 2017, 10:42:21 PM »
It just goes to show how slow on the uptake the average supporter is.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey