Author Topic: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?  (Read 98770 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #720 on: April 12, 2017, 05:45:35 PM »
I think Amaral is unprincipled to a core, will grab what he can get and will cause the maximum pain he can get away with.

Why don't you accept once and for all, the Mccann's share of the blame in this case ?


ferryman

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #721 on: April 12, 2017, 05:47:39 PM »
Why don't you accept once and for all, the Mccann's share of the blame in this case ?

Share of the blame?

Running checks (narrowly) infrequent enough to thwart an abduction, or apprehend an abductor.

That's about it.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #722 on: April 12, 2017, 05:48:58 PM »
Staggering, simply Staggering.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #723 on: April 12, 2017, 05:51:28 PM »
The Mccann's and no one else are responsible for the mess they are in.

It was never Amaral.

As to his basic theory, that remains on the table.
You can't be serious.  Even the SC judges steered clear of it.  It was a thesis and it has run it course and found to be wanting, it was found to be damaging, it hurt the reputations of the McCanns and it hampered the search for Madeleine. 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #724 on: April 12, 2017, 06:40:11 PM »
You can't be serious.  Even the SC judges steered clear of it.  It was a thesis and it has run it course and found to be wanting, it was found to be damaging, it hurt the reputations of the McCanns and it hampered the search for Madeleine.


It wasn't in the courts remit to judge his theory.

Have you read the judgement ?

As to the Mccann's,  they hurt their own reputations through what they did.

Offline G-Unit

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #725 on: April 12, 2017, 07:30:43 PM »
You can't be serious.  Even the SC judges steered clear of it.  It was a thesis and it has run it course and found to be wanting, it was found to be damaging, it hurt the reputations of the McCanns and it hampered the search for Madeleine.

The McCanns damaged their own reputation, as this link demonstrates;

May 4 2008 by Phil Cullen, Sunday Sun
 
ON the one hand, Kate and Gerry McCann want no stone unturned in the hunt for Madeleine.
 
And on the other, they are reluctant to return to Portugal for a reconstruction.
 
One the one hand, they court publicity.
 
And on the other, they get huffy when journalists don’t follow the McCann agenda.

Watching the TV interviews last week on the anniversary of Madeleine’s disappearance I was struck by how many awkward questions they faced.

They included the leaked witness statement where Kate admitted Madeleine had asked why she was left to cry.

The fact remains they did have "something to do" with Madeleine's disappearance.

By that, I mean leaving her and her siblings alone that night.

And therefore contributing to a sequence of events which resulted in tragedy.

All right-minded people will hope their daughter is found.

But her parents are doing themselves no favours with the contradictory messages they send out.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id118.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #726 on: April 12, 2017, 07:34:27 PM »
The McCanns damaged their own reputation, as this link demonstrates;

May 4 2008 by Phil Cullen, Sunday Sun
 
ON the one hand, Kate and Gerry McCann want no stone unturned in the hunt for Madeleine.
 
And on the other, they are reluctant to return to Portugal for a reconstruction.
 
One the one hand, they court publicity.
 
And on the other, they get huffy when journalists don’t follow the McCann agenda.

Watching the TV interviews last week on the anniversary of Madeleine’s disappearance I was struck by how many awkward questions they faced.

They included the leaked witness statement where Kate admitted Madeleine had asked why she was left to cry.

The fact remains they did have "something to do" with Madeleine's disappearance.

By that, I mean leaving her and her siblings alone that night.

And therefore contributing to a sequence of events which resulted in tragedy.

All right-minded people will hope their daughter is found.

But her parents are doing themselves no favours with the contradictory messages they send out.
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id118.htm

After the way they were shamefully accused in their arguido interviews, why do you suppose they would trust further proposed actions?


stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #727 on: April 12, 2017, 07:38:51 PM »
After the way they were shamefully accused in their arguido interviews, why do you suppose they would trust further proposed actions?

They were investigated, as they would have been over here.

Get over it.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #728 on: April 12, 2017, 07:43:45 PM »
They were investigated, as they would have been over here.

Get over it.

Doesn't remotely address my point.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #729 on: April 12, 2017, 07:50:22 PM »
Doesn't remotely address my point.

You have no point.

You only defend the McCann's, no matter what.

ferryman

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #730 on: April 12, 2017, 07:55:32 PM »
You have no point.

You only defend the McCann's, no matter what.

I could say you only denigrate the McCanns, no matter what.

Where does that take us?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #731 on: April 12, 2017, 07:58:42 PM »
I could say you only denigrate the McCanns, no matter what.

Where does that take us?

I don't need to.

Their actions said everything about them.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #732 on: April 12, 2017, 08:26:04 PM »
I don't need to.

Their actions said everything about them.

and your posts say everything about you

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #733 on: April 12, 2017, 08:27:21 PM »
and your posts say everything about you

Originality is not your strong point.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #734 on: April 12, 2017, 08:30:15 PM »
Originality is not your strong point.

now where have i heard that a million times before....originality....LOL