Author Topic: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?  (Read 98744 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #240 on: April 06, 2017, 05:12:42 PM »
b....r!  Looks like I should have saved some posts.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #241 on: April 06, 2017, 07:04:23 PM »
So following that logic the McCann left Portugal whilst still being under arrest?
They left while still official suspects yes.  But you know as well as I do that there is no British equivalent to "arguido" status so in order to make things simple for the GBP the article was written in simplified terms for idiots to understand, but they got the essence bang on - people were made official suspects and questioned. 

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #242 on: April 06, 2017, 07:06:50 PM »
If there is no truth to be corroborated form the stories what else are they?
???  Have you got any examples of completely false stories in the papers or not?  Because according to some on here, virtually everything that appears in the press about this case is a lie that originates from the mouth of Clarence Mitchell or another member of Team McCann - should be easy for you to prove all these lies, so still waiting for the evidence.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #243 on: April 06, 2017, 07:37:49 PM »
They left while still official suspects yes.  But you know as well as I do that there is no British equivalent to "arguido" status so in order to make things simple for the GBP the article was written in simplified terms for idiots to understand, but they got the essence bang on - people were made official suspects and questioned.

arguido is equivalent to being interviewed under caution....so despite their efforts it looks like all the idiots didnt undersatnd

Offline barrier

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #244 on: April 06, 2017, 07:42:55 PM »
arguido is equivalent to being interviewed under caution....so despite their efforts it looks like all the idiots didnt undersatnd

As a witness or as a suspect,it can also be asked for can it not?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #245 on: April 06, 2017, 07:44:10 PM »
???  Have you got any examples of completely false stories in the papers or not?  Because according to some on here, virtually everything that appears in the press about this case is a lie that originates from the mouth of Clarence Mitchell or another member of Team McCann - should be easy for you to prove all these lies, so still waiting for the evidence.

A simple read of all related supposed search stories will reveal they contain nothing.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #246 on: April 06, 2017, 07:45:56 PM »
They left while still official suspects yes.  But you know as well as I do that there is no British equivalent to "arguido" status so in order to make things simple for the GBP the article was written in simplified terms for idiots to understand, but they got the essence bang on - people were made official suspects and questioned.

Are you describing the McCanns as idiots,bit strong for a supporter after all they would be the ones to need explaining to.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2017, 07:48:23 PM by barrier »
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #247 on: April 06, 2017, 07:53:06 PM »
They left while still official suspects yes.  But you know as well as I do that there is no British equivalent to "arguido" status so in order to make things simple for the GBP the article was written in simplified terms for idiots to understand, but they got the essence bang on - people were made official suspects and questioned.
According to this you are not a formal suspect so where did the shit about iminent arrest come from.

Wki.
Quote
(law) Under the Portuguese legal system, a person kept for questioning as a witness to a crime, who is not a formal suspect. (Arrests can only be made after police have designated an individual as an arguido. A person can also request this status for the rights it gives, such as the right to a legal representative and the right to remain silent.)
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #248 on: April 06, 2017, 07:56:37 PM »
As a witness or as a suspect,it can also be asked for can it not?

it can if a witness does not want to answer any questions

Offline barrier

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #249 on: April 06, 2017, 07:58:04 PM »
it can if a witness does not want to answer any questions

Or be represented.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #250 on: April 06, 2017, 07:59:44 PM »
Or be represented.

there is a uk equivlent...interview under caution

Offline barrier

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #251 on: April 06, 2017, 08:00:51 PM »
there is a uk equivlent...interview under caution

Also as a witness.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #252 on: April 06, 2017, 08:05:51 PM »
Any mods looking in? can the last few post be moved to the off topic thread I think this one is wandering.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #253 on: April 06, 2017, 09:58:01 PM »
Are you describing the McCanns as idiots,bit strong for a supporter after all they would be the ones to need explaining to.
Anther one deliberately misunderstanding my post - no I am not describing the McCanns as idiots, any idiot can see that.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: So what now, post Supreme Court decisions?
« Reply #254 on: April 06, 2017, 10:01:27 PM »
According to this you are not a formal suspect so where did the shit about iminent arrest come from.

Wki.
A lack of understanding regarding the portuguese legal system and the meaning of the term arguido I should think, or if not that a decision to use terms that were snappier and more comprehensible to lowest common denominator readership.  Fact is - individuals were brought in for questioning as predicted by the papers.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/madeleine-mccann-arrests-imminent-after-british-police-request-assistance-from-portuguese-9056176.html

In essence nothing patently false in that article IMO.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2017, 10:05:07 PM by Alfie »