Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"

[Mr Gray]

Did you kiss his ring ?

of course

[ShiningInLuz]

This is really absurd.  You could equally say the archiving report got it wrong because the parents were driven  into PdL at the beginning of the holiday so did not spend the entire holiday in the OC or at the beach.  Nit-picking in the extreme and you have deflected entirely from the reason why this point was even mention in the archiving report in the first place.

Alfie, the person trying to deflect is you.

I said the archiving report got it wrong, which it did.  You are trying to deflect onto something else.  It's not working.

[Mr Gray]

Alfie, the person trying to deflect is you.

I said the archiving report got it wrong, which it did.  You are trying to deflect onto something else.  It's not working.

i would say Alf is doing a very good job at showing the weakness of your argument

[ferryman]

Since the archiving report got it wrong, you speculate.  I am happy to stop on the fact that the archiving report got it wrong.  I don't feel the need to speculate why.

Got it wrong how?

[ShiningInLuz]

Got it wrong how?

Read back on the thread.  The report says the McCanns had no knowledge of things external to Luz.  Matthew Oldfield says otherwise.

[Alfie]

Alfie, the person trying to deflect is you.

I said the archiving report got it wrong, which it did.  You are trying to deflect onto something else.  It's not working.

The archiving report did not get it wrong on this point.  The McCanns did not have the knowledge of the outlying terrain to enable them to hide a body, this is the salient point, anything else is nit-picking nonsense.

[Alfie]

Read back on the thread.  The report says the McCanns had no knowledge of things external to Luz.  Matthew Oldfield says otherwise.

What knowldge pertinent to the issue of body occultation did Matt Oldfield speak of?

[stephen25000]

of course

You didn't get that one.

[Mr Gray]

Read back on the thread.  The report says the McCanns had no knowledge of things external to Luz.  Matthew Oldfield says otherwise.

the report doesnt say that.....mountains and molehills come to mind again

[ShiningInLuz]

The archiving report did not get it wrong on this point.  The McCanns did not have the knowledge of the outlying terrain to enable them to hide a body, this is the salient point, anything else is nit-picking nonsense.

Tough, Alfie.  The archiving report does not mention knowledge sufficient to hide a body.

It is merely about whether the McCanns knowledge was confined to Luz.  Matthew Oldfield made clear it was not.

Kindly stop banging on about body concealment, which only you have raised.  Try to reconcile the archiving report and Oldfield's statement.  You can't.  The archiving statement got it wrong.

[Mr Gray]

Tough, Alfie.  The archiving report does not mention knowledge sufficient to hide a body.

It is merely about whether the McCanns knowledge was confined to Luz.  Matthew Oldfield made clear it was not.

Kindly stop banging on about body concealment, which only you have raised.  Try to reconcile the archiving report and Oldfield's statement.  You can't.  The archiving statement got it wrong.

you must be absolutely blind if you dont realise the reference to knowledge of Luz was re disposing of a body

[Mr Gray]

Tough, Alfie.  The archiving report does not mention knowledge sufficient to hide a body.

It is merely about whether the McCanns knowledge was confined to Luz.  Matthew Oldfield made clear it was not.

Kindly stop banging on about body concealment, which only you have raised.  Try to reconcile the archiving report and Oldfield's statement.  You can't.  The archiving statement got it wrong.

you are totally wrong again...it is the archiving report which raises the subject of a body...have you read it

Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child's death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so. Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the 'Ocean Club' resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the

[Alfie]

you are totally wrong again...it is the archiving report which raises the subject of a body...have you read it

Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child's death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so. Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the 'Ocean Club' resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the

Thank you, I was just about to post that.  SIL is keen to accuse me and you of losing the plot on a regular basis, well I think the shoe is on the other foot this evening!

[ShiningInLuz]

you are totally wrong again...it is the archiving report which raises the subject of a body...have you read it

Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child's death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so. Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the 'Ocean Club' resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the

I quoted it correctly.  You have quoted it incorrectly.  Other than that ...

[Mr Gray]

I quoted it correctly.  You have quoted it incorrectly.  Other than that ...

I havent quoted anything....Ive copied and pasted it......your accusation is another example of you being wrong...a pathetic response


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LEGAL_SUMMARY.htm