Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"

[Robittybob1]

I quoted it correctly.  You have quoted it incorrectly.  Other than that ...

There are problems here.

[ShiningInLuz]

I havent quoted anything....Ive copied and pasted it......your accusation is another example of you being wrong...a pathetic response


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/LEGAL_SUMMARY.htm

0/10. Must try harder.

[Alfie]

I quoted it correctly.  You have quoted it incorrectly.  Other than that ...

You're having a giraffe now.  You said the archiving report didn't mention sufficient local knowledge to bury a body.  You need to stop winding us up and admit your mistake graciously.

[Mr Gray]

0/10. Must try harder.

you really are now making an absolute fool of yourself...this is your post..


Re: Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?
« Reply #411 on: Today at 03:27:36 PM »
Quote
"Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child's death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so. Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the 'Ocean Club' resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the English friends that were with them on holiday there, they had no known friends or contacts in Portugal."


you have quoted the exact same quote you accuse me of getting wrong...

[Robittybob1]

You're having a giraffe now.  You said the archiving report didn't mention sufficient local knowledge to bury a body.  You need to stop winding us up and admit your mistake graciously.

Yes the forum is getting boring with all this bickering.

[Mr Gray]

You're having a giraffe now.  You said the archiving report didn't mention sufficient local knowledge to bury a body.  You need to stop winding us up and admit your mistake graciously.

as you can see sil quoted the same post she accused me of misquoting.....LOL

[Alfie]

0/10. Must try harder.

You'd argue black was white would't you?  The breathless audacity, or is it stupidity?  Hard to tell.

[Mr Gray]

Yes the forum is getting boring with all this bickering.

the problem is with a poster repeatedly posting things that are not true and repeatedly refusing to admit she is wrong

[Mr Gray]

You'd argue black was white would't you?  The breathless audacity, or is it stupidity?  Hard to tell.

looks like sil has absolutely no answer to her blunder...no surprise

[Alice Purjorick]

You're having a giraffe now. You said the archiving report didn't mention sufficient local knowledge to bury a body.  You need to stop winding us up and admit your mistake graciously.

That could be construed as libel per se. Is there a mod in the house?

[Mr Gray]

That could be construed as libel per se. Is there a mod in the house?

depends in which country the having is taking place.....I think in portugal incest is legal...not sure about having a giraffe though

[ShiningInLuz]

you really are now making an absolute fool of yourself...this is your post..


Re: Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?
« Reply #411 on: Today at 03:27:36 PM »
Quote
"Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child's death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so. Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the 'Ocean Club' resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the English friends that were with them on holiday there, they had no known friends or contacts in Portugal."


you have quoted the exact same quote you accuse me of getting wrong...

You got the quote wrong.  Fact.

I mentioned nothing about body disposal.  Fact.

I claimed the archiving report said the McCanns had been restricted to Luz.  Fact  I claimed the archiving report was wrong.  Fact.  Matthew's statement shows the archiving report is wrong.  Fact.

Is the archiving report wrong about the actual and potential range of the McCanns?  Yes.  Fact.

Is the truth really so hard to swallow?

[Mr Gray]

You got the quote wrong.  Fact.

I mentioned nothing about body disposal.  Fact.

I claimed the archiving report said the McCanns had been restricted to Luz.  Fact  I claimed the archiving report was wrong.  Fact.  Matthew's statement shows the archiving report is wrong.  Fact.

Is the archiving report wrong about the actual and potential range of the McCanns?  Yes.  Fact.

Is the truth really so hard to swallow?

this is your quote...I repeat ...your quote...


Re: Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?
« Reply #411 on: Today at 03:27:36 PM »
Quote
"Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child's death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so. Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the 'Ocean Club' resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the English friends that were with them on holiday there, they had no known friends or contacts in Portugal."


your quote...yes your quote...i have highlighted the point in YOUR QUOTE re body disposal

[Alfie]

You got the quote wrong.  Fact.

I mentioned nothing about body disposal.  Fact.

I claimed the archiving report said the McCanns had been restricted to Luz.  Fact  I claimed the archiving report was wrong.  Fact.  Matthew's statement shows the archiving report is wrong.  Fact.

Is the archiving report wrong about the actual and potential range of the McCanns?  Yes.  Fact.

Is the truth really so hard to swallow?

"Tough, Alfie.  The archiving report does not mention knowledge sufficient to hide a body" - wrong.  It does.  It is the ONLY reason why the subject of the McCanns movements in or around PdL are mentioned in the archiving report.  There is no other reason to mention it.  The report is correct to say the McCanns did not have sufficient knowledge of the local terrain to hide a body.  If the report is wrong perhaps you would like to re-write it for us now and tell us what it should have said with regard to the McCanns knowledge of the local terrain and whether it was sufficient to enable them to find a body disposal site?  No, of course you won't. 

[Alice Purjorick]

The Singularity had this pegged with his/her second post on the thread:
"I do think as we get closer to May 3rd, the press will likely have pieces like this. It doesn't really shed any further light and is just an opinion piece from David Edgar".

Whomsoever is sheltering "the abductor" * is an accessory therefore unlikely to cough, plea bargaining being verboten and all in Portugal.

What's this abductor business paleface?