Author Topic: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"  (Read 129838 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #435 on: April 12, 2017, 11:13:21 PM »
depends in which country the having is taking place.....I think in portugal incest is legal...not sure about having a giraffe though
Alice has become tiresomely literal all of a sudden, anything to try and get some attention I suppose.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #436 on: April 12, 2017, 11:14:06 PM »
Next ...knowledge of an area is not knowing an area...but such precise perfect logic is wasted on someone with eyes wide shut

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #437 on: April 12, 2017, 11:15:40 PM »
Alice has become tiresomely literal all of a sudden, anything to try and get some attention I suppose.

i think shes feeling a bit bruised having been caught out on her wind velocity post...the wind has speed ...the thing measuring windspeed has angular velocity

Alfie

  • Guest
Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #438 on: April 12, 2017, 11:17:49 PM »
i think shes feeling a bit bruised having been caught out on her wind velocity post...the wind has speed ...the thing measuring windspeed has angular velocity
It doesn't surprise me that Alice knows alot about wind, frankly.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #439 on: April 12, 2017, 11:21:34 PM »
Alice has become tiresomely literal all of a sudden, anything to try and get some attention I suppose.

I have carte blanche to be the site WUM according to you O wisest of pelicans. Why should I pass up the opportunity. Especially when it gives you the opportunity to make your customary fatuous remarks; profundity not being your long suit, old stick.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #440 on: April 12, 2017, 11:24:49 PM »
I have carte blanche to be the site WUM according to you O wisest of pelicans. Why should I pass up the opportunity. Especially when it gives you the opportunity to make your customary fatuous remarks; profundity not being your long suit, old stick.

your problem is you take pride in being the site WUM ...but in reality you dont wind anybody up...sad but true

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #441 on: April 12, 2017, 11:26:06 PM »
"Tough, Alfie.  The archiving report does not mention knowledge sufficient to hide a body" - wrong.  It does.  It is the ONLY reason why the subject of the McCanns movements in or around PdL are mentioned in the archiving report.  There is no other reason to mention it.  The report is correct to say the McCanns did not have sufficient knowledge of the local terrain to hide a body.  If the report is wrong perhaps you would like to re-write it for us now and tell us what it should have said with regard to the McCanns knowledge of the local terrain and whether it was sufficient to enable them to find a body disposal site?  No, of course you won't.
There you go again, Alfie.  If you misquote often enough, surely one of your misquotes will strike home.

The report says, in simple English for the avoidance of doubt, that the McCanns did not go beyond the OC and the beach.

Both of them did.

I made no claim about body disposal or body concealment whatsoever.

Just to throw a little petrol on the bonfire, the McCanns did not need to leave 'the OC' to dispose of or to conceal Madeleine.

So have a little think, Alfie.  Are we talking about the archiving report?  Or are we talking about body disposal/body concealment.
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #442 on: April 12, 2017, 11:27:54 PM »
There you go again, Alfie.  If you misquote often enough, surely one of your misquotes will strike home.

The report says, in simple English for the avoidance of doubt, that the McCanns did not go beyond the OC and the beach.

Both of them did.

I made no claim about body disposal or body concealment whatsoever.

Just to throw a little petrol on the bonfire, the McCanns did not need to leave 'the OC' to dispose of or to conceal Madeleine.

So have a little think, Alfie.  Are we talking about the archiving report?  Or are we talking about body disposal/body concealment.

you quoted the archiving report which made this claim

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #443 on: April 12, 2017, 11:35:34 PM »
you quoted the archiving report which made this claim
So I made no claim.
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #444 on: April 12, 2017, 11:39:36 PM »
So I made no claim.

perhaps you could tell us clearly what you claim because you quoted the archiving report which discusses the mccanns knowledge of the area re disposing of a body

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #445 on: April 12, 2017, 11:58:39 PM »
perhaps you could tell us clearly what you claim because you quoted the archiving report which discusses the mccanns knowledge of the area re disposing of a body
In the quote where I quoted the quote. 

And in which I claimed the archiving report got it wrong re movements of the McCanns.

BUT MADE NO CLAIM WHATSOEVER RE BODY DISPOSAL.

If you get such a simple fact wrong, what hope is there for McCann supporters?
What's up, old man?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #446 on: April 13, 2017, 12:08:01 AM »
In the quote where I quoted the quote. 

And in which I claimed the archiving report got it wrong re movements of the McCanns.

BUT MADE NO CLAIM WHATSOEVER RE BODY DISPOSAL.

If you get such a simple fact wrong, what hope is there for McCann supporters?

again this is your post,,


Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child's death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so. Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the 'Ocean Club' resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the

you absolutely...100% talk of body disposal

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #447 on: April 13, 2017, 12:11:59 AM »
again this is your post,,


Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child's death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so. Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the 'Ocean Club' resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the

you absolutely...100% talk of body disposal
Nope, quote does, I didn't.
What's up, old man?

Offline misty

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #448 on: April 13, 2017, 12:12:13 AM »
This is what MO told the PJ on 10/5/07 i.e.the info used in the archiving report

http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MATTHEW-OLDFIELD-10MAY.htm
"By the way, he relates that, on a date he does not recall for sure but on one day in the past week during which it rained in PdL (thinking it was 2 May, the day before the disappearance) he went on a 40-minute run on the streets around the resort together with KM".

This is what he said in his rogatory 9/4/08 i.e. after the archiving report had been written
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MATTHEW-OLDFIELD-ROGATORY.htm

Reply 'Erm, I remember I went running with Kate at lunchtime, she's quite a good runner, and we went out on the road all the way up to the main junc, erm, the sort of main road where you access Praia da Luz from and then back'.
 
4078 'What sort of distance would that be''
Reply 'Erm, yeah, I think it'd be about three or four miles, maybe each way'.


The PJ report was only wrong because the PJ never sought to clarify the route the runners took. Presumably it wasn't important to them at the time.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"
« Reply #449 on: April 13, 2017, 12:12:45 AM »
Nope, quote does, I didn't.

its your post