Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"

[Mr Gray]

Well, there's a surprise.

Since without an abductor , we know where the McCann's are.

A nonsensical post

[stephen25000]

A nonsensical post

Not at all.

Without abduction Dave,  the Mccann's bear responsibility.

[Mr Gray]

Not at all.

Without abduction Dave,  the Mccann's bear responsibility.

So with an abductor they are not responsible
I understand

[stephen25000]

So with an abductor they are not responsible
I understand

Who left their children by themselves ?

The tooth fairy  ?

[Mr Gray]

Who left their children by themselves ?

The tooth fairy  ?

post 586
You seem obsessed with fairies LOL

[Alfie]

What abductor Alfie ?

The theoretical abductor that John was talking about.

[Mr Gray]

If the remit is supposedly restricted to abduction then why did Redwood say Maddie may not have left the apartment alive
Proof that the remit is not limiting the investigation into other scenarios

[stephen25000]

post 586
You seem obsessed with fairies LOL

You are trailing my posts.

That's obsession.

[stephen25000]

The theoretical abductor that John was talking about.

'Theoretical' being the pertinent word Alfie, and no evidence of a break-in to the apartment.

[stephen25000]

If the remit is supposedly restricted to abduction then why did Redwood say Maddie may not have left the apartment alive
Proof that the remit is not limiting the investigation into other scenarios

So, as regards Redwood, where does leave the dogs indications ?

Now what did BHH say in his Freudian slip ?

[Mr Gray]

So, as regards Redwood, where does leave the dogs indications ?

Now what did BHH say in his Freudian slip ?

There are no indications by the cadaver dog
Only unconfirmed alerts
No evidence of anything at all

As I have said many times
Sceptics do not understand the evidence
That's why they are sceptics

[stephen25000]

What is evident, before and after your changes to your post, is that you haven't a clue what you are talking about.


I'm afraid, repeatedly typing the McCann mantra, has become laughable, as is the your use of the word 'sceptics'.

[Mr Gray]

What is evident, before and after your changes to your post, is that you haven't a clue what you are talking about.


I'm afraid, repeatedly typing the McCann mantra, has become laughable, as is the your use of the word 'sceptics'.

The alerts are evidence of nothing
That is a fact
And after 10 years you still don't understand that simple fact

[Benice]

So you are happy that members of SY , and other forces contributed to Amaral's  fund.

Now why would they do that if they believed in an abduction.

If you are claiming as a fact that SY officers contributed to Amaral's fund then you need to provide evidence to back up your claim.

In the meantime I shall continue to regard it as ridiculous propaganda on the same level of credibility as R.Hall's claim that Mrs Fenn colluded with the McCanns -  and every person who saw Madeleine after the 29th April is lying.

I await your proof.
(but I won't hold my breath)

[Robittybob1]

The alerts tell us nothing and you still don't understand after 10 years
The rest of your post is pure garbage
Grow up

Amaral won his case and the forum has gone quite.  The McCanns were correct.