Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"

[misty]

In cahoots? That's the first time I've heard that. Do you have a cite?

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id170.htm
The McCanns hold a press conference and take questions from the assembled media
 
Tuesday 22 May 2007

*snipped*
Sandra Felgueiras (RTP): "But did you know Robert Murat?"
 
Gerry: "I'm not going to comment on that."


Why did that particular journalist ask that specific question?

[faithlilly]

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/Nigel/id170.htm
The McCanns hold a press conference and take questions from the assembled media
 
Tuesday 22 May 2007

*snipped*
Sandra Felgueiras (RTP): "But did you know Robert Murat?"
 
Gerry: "I'm not going to comment on that."


Why did that particular journalist ask that specific question?

Are you suggesting SF was fed that question by Amaral ? If so you'll have to have a cite.

[misty]

Are you suggesting SF was fed that question by Amaral ? If so you'll have to have a cite.

Sorry, I don't have links to the wording of any leaks from the initial PJ investigation.

[faithlilly]

Sorry, I don't have links to the wording of any leaks from the initial PJ investigation.

So you have nothing to substantiate your musings?

[misty]

So you have nothing to substantiate your musings?

Just the question asked by the Portuguese reporter, which is better than absolutely no evidence whatsoever.

[faithlilly]

Just the question asked by the Portuguese reporter, which is better than absolutely no evidence whatsoever.

It is absolutely no evidence whatsoever. Murat had just been made an arguido and in that context the question was absolutely appropriate. Of course the McCanns had met Murat via Steve Carpenter.

[stephen25000]

The prosecutors were in no doubt Madeleine was abducted. 

They said so.

They also said the parents could not, reasonably, be expected to foresee that any of their children might be abducted.

You really need to read what was copied and pasted earlier.


There is no proof an abduction took place, and no evidence that can't be explained by the  other scenarios as well.

[misty]

It is absolutely no evidence whatsoever. Murat had just been made an arguido and in that context the question was absolutely appropriate. Of course the McCanns had met Murat via Steve Carpenter.

Why was the question appropriate? Had no-one in the press or PJ ever sought to establish that the translator was not previously known to the victim's family & their friends in the preceding 18 days?

[faithlilly]

Why was the question appropriate? Had no-one in the press or PJ ever sought to establish that the translator was not previously known to the victim's family & their friends in the preceding 18 days?

Obviously SF hadn't or why ask the question?

Let's cut to the chase misty. Do you really believe that SF asked if Gerry knew Murat because the PJ had encouraged her to in order link him and Murat? Really?

[misty]

Obviously SF hadn't or why ask the question?

Let's cut to the chase misty. Do you really believe that SF asked if Gerry knew Murat because the PJ had encouraged her to in order link him and Murat? Really?

Yes. I think it was asked publicly for that very purpose.

[Eleanor]

Yes. I think it was asked publicly for that very purpose.

So do I.  And it didn't half cause a kerfuffle.  Pages and pages of it.

[Robittybob1]

"I'm not going to comment on that" Well that is one question Gerry didn't answer.  47 more to go to match Kate.

[faithlilly]

Yes. I think it was asked publicly for that very purpose.

And it's sceptics who are thought to believe wild conspiracy theories 

[G-Unit]

And it's sceptics who are thought to believe wild conspiracy theories 

Ah, but there was/is a Portuguese agenda according to Clarence;

He told The Sun Online: “They want to make it clear that they are not making any money out of Madeleine’s disappearance. Any claims are spurious nonsense but fits in with the Portuguese agenda.”
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-star/20170217/281719794341931

[Alice Purjorick]

Ah, but there was/is a Portuguese agenda according to Clarence;

He told The Sun Online: “They want to make it clear that they are not making any money out of Madeleine’s disappearance. Any claims are spurious nonsense but fits in with the Portuguese agenda.”
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-star/20170217/281719794341931

Is that like The Schleswig Holstein Question , The Spanish Inquisition, The Ipcress File or even The Quiller Memorandum?.
Without Mitchell it would have all vanished in a puff of green like a panto wizaaaard, long ago
Look on the postive side Katie Archibald is doing well so far this week.