Former McCann PI "Who is protecting Maddie's kidnapper?"

[Brietta]

You could argue this question in one of two ways.

Firstly, one could argue that the two dogs were sent to Portugal to find evidence of a cadaver and so implicate the parents.  Alternatively, one could argue that the dogs were sent to Portugal in the hope that they would find nothing whatsoever and so clear the parents.

So which one was it, were they sent to implicate or exonerate?

In my opinion, the latter was the actual result of their inspection but they were still used to implicate even ten years down the line.

[stephen25000]

why does it have to be either...the dogs did not find evidence of a cadaver and in effect they found nothing.

the dogs were sent with the best intentions afaiac......to find evidence that may help solve the case...they didnt find any evidence

The dogs indicated only on property/materials which the McCann's owned or used.

FACT.

Nowhere else, and to nobody's else's belongings.

[Benice]

The information does not remain the same if the remit is different.  If the remit of a project was to build a channel tunnel you would not get a channel bridge, because a channel bridge would not be considered.

OG has quite clearly not considered everything, as proved by its actions.  To claim that the remit is meaningless is nonsensical.

It wouldn't matter whether you were building a channel tunnel or a channel bridge - neither would succeed if you were prevented from using using some of the material required to do the job properly.

I have never claimed that the remit is meaningless.     However my question remains the same.

In view of the remit -  what would SY do with information that may have emerged from those 40,000 plus documents in their possession which clearly suggested that the McCanns were implicated in their daughter's disappearance?

[ShiningInLuz]

It wouldn't matter whether you were building a channel tunnel or a channel bridge - neither would succeed if you were prevented from using using some of the material required to do the job properly.

I have never claimed that the remit is meaningless.     However my question remains the same.

In view of the remit -  what would SY do with information that may have emerged from those 40,000 plus documents in their possession which clearly suggested that the McCanns were implicated in their daughter's disappearance?

"may have emerged from" "clearly suggested that".

I have already said that I don't do 'magic bullets' hypotheticals.

[Mr Gray]

"may have emerged from" "clearly suggested that".

I have already said that I don't do 'magic bullets' hypotheticals.

you actually do a lot of speculation......

Speculation now follows.  My expectation is that the dogs were positioned as ultra-reliable, never failed blah blah blah.  My expectation is the DNA evidence was relayed as being strong.  In such a situation, it would have been remiss of Carlos not to discuss the 2 year option with Kate and it would have been remiss of Carlos not to recommend the 'no comment' route once arguidoed.

[Alfie]

"may have emerged from" "clearly suggested that".

I have already said that I don't do 'magic bullets' hypotheticals.

yet you have speculated that it would be possible for the McCanns to hide a body, so stop deflecting.You DO do hypotheticals so address the point!

[ShiningInLuz]

yet you have speculated that it would be possible for the McCanns to hide a body, so stop deflecting.You DO do hypotheticals so address the point!

Repeat.  I don't do magic bullet hypotheticals.

[Alfie]

Repeat.  I don't do magic bullet hypotheticals.

LOL, what's the difference?

[Mr Gray]

Repeat.  I don't do magic bullet hypotheticals.

but you do speculation

[ShiningInLuz]

LOL, what's the difference?

Hypothetical.  What if?  Could it be that?  Fine, we discuss such things all day long on this forum.

Magic bullet.  A piece of evidence emerges that immediately solves the case that has been unsolved for 10 years.

Massive conspiracy theory.  Do I need to go further?

[Mr Gray]

Hypothetical.  What if?  Could it be that?  Fine, we discuss such things all day long on this forum.

Magic bullet.  A piece of evidence emerges that immediately solves the case that has been unsolved for 10 years.

Massive conspiracy theory.  Do I need to go further?

no one has mentioned a magic bullet apart from you. We are talking about a small piece of information that points to the mccanns ...do you imagine SY would ignore it.....dont duck the question and dont twisty turn

[Alfie]

Hypothetical.  What if?  Could it be that?  Fine, we discuss such things all day long on this forum.

Magic bullet.  A piece of evidence emerges that immediately solves the case that has been unsolved for 10 years.

Massive conspiracy theory.  Do I need to go further?

Yes - just answer the question with a yes or a no, I'm not looking for an essay or an excuse.

[Mr Gray]

sil has accused me of ducking the question...which I didnt....now it seems she is

[Alfie]

sil has accused me of ducking the question...which I didnt....now it seems she is

Actually to be fair to SIL she or he has already answered this question,  The answer she or he gave earlier in this thread is that she or he does believe that the Met would deliberately ignore information that pointed to the McCanns, in other words he or she does believe in some conspiracy to protect them.

[Alice Purjorick]

It wouldn't matter whether you were building a channel tunnel or a channel bridge - neither would succeed if you were prevented from using using some of the material required to do the job properly.

I have never claimed that the remit is meaningless.     However my question remains the same.

In view of the remit -  what would SY do with information that may have emerged from those 40,000 plus documents in their possession which clearly suggested that the McCanns were implicated in their daughter's disappearance?

?

1 It would be interesting watching them try to build a bridge using a rather large rotary rock cutter 
2 Give the info to the CPS or AG depending upon whose jurisdiction it came under ?