Why are some people so obsessed in supporting the Mccanns ?

[Benice]

Have you never even seen once the irony of Kate Mccann being made an Ambassador for the Missing Peoples Charity, after what shew and her husband did in leaving their children undefended and by themselves, with infrequent 'checks', not all verified ?

Carly claimed that the McCanns did not care about other missing children.  I posted evidence to show how wrong she was.    I see you have ignored those points.

Your habit of countering any post - (no matter what is being discussed in it)- by repeating the same 'they left their kids'  mantra over and over and over and over again could not be more obsessional IMO.

Awaits the usual childish tit for tat (no it's not me - it's you) reply.

[carlymichelle]

What you claim is simply not true,    Of course they care about other missing children which is why they have raised thousands of pound for the Missing People Charity and also donated thousands of pounds to that charity.

Have you forgotten about the following:

QUOTE from Wales on Line.

Coral Jones and Mrs McCann, mother of missing Madeleine, unveiled a digital billboard at King’s Cross station in London promoting an enhanced Child Rescue Alerts system to inform the public about missing children whose lives are considered at risk.

The scheme will use social media including text messages, email and digital billboards across the UK in addition to traditional broadcast media to issue the alerts when it is launched on Sunday, International Missing Children’s Day.

The scheme, the responsibility of the National Crime Agency (NCA) in partnership with the charity Missing People and the company Groupcall Limited, already has 25,000 people signed up.
End quote.

No doubt you will want to withdraw your claim that ''they just care about Maddie',   But I won't hold my breath eh?

i was talking about supporters not caring about other kids not the mcanns

[stephen25000]

Carly claimed that the McCanns did not care about other missing children.  I posted evidence to show how wrong she was.    I see you have ignored those points.

Your habit of countering any post - (no matter what is being discussed in it)- by repeating the same 'they left their kids'  mantra over and over and over and over again could not be more obsessional IMO.

Awaits the usual childish tit for tat (no it's not me - it's you) reply.

What the Mccanns have done is engage in PR.

No more, no less.

The only activity they have engaged in, IMO, is an attempt to save their hides.

It doesn't wash now, and it never did.

[Alfie]

i was talking about supporters not caring about other kids not the mcanns

How do you know what we do and don't care about?

[Benice]

i was talking about supporters not caring about other kids not the mcanns

Well perhaps you should have made that more clear  - as it didn't cross my mind that you were claiming with no proof whatsoever that it was supporters didn't care about other missing children.   Perhaps you can provide evidence of that claim?

Can I take it that you agree with me that the McCanns do care about other missing children - as described in my previous post to you?

[Erngath]

How do you know what we do and don't care about?

It's a ridiculous claim and very offensive.

[stephen25000]

It is interesting to observe, that some McCann supporters questions the motives of 'sceptics', but aren't prepared for the tables to be turned.

[Alfie]

It is interesting to observe, that some McCann supporters questions the motives of 'sceptics', but aren't prepared for the tables to be turned.

Unless you think our motives are in some way criminal ie: knowingly supporting criminals to evade justice I don't really see what is so shockingly awful about people defending the parents of a missing child online against the torrent of suspicion, abuse and vitriol that is heaped upon them on a daily basis.  OK, some of us (most of us?) might be considered obsessive if by that you mean we log on here every day to discuss the issue but I'd rather be considered an obsessive supporter of people that I believe to be innocent than an obsessive hate monger of people that I believe are hiding something.

[faithlilly]

What you claim is simply not true,    Of course they care about other missing children which is why they have raised thousands of pound for the Missing People Charity and also donated thousands of pounds to that charity.

Have you forgotten about the following:

QUOTE from Wales on Line.

Coral Jones and Mrs McCann, mother of missing Madeleine, unveiled a digital billboard at King’s Cross station in London promoting an enhanced Child Rescue Alerts system to inform the public about missing children whose lives are considered at risk.

The scheme will use social media including text messages, email and digital billboards across the UK in addition to traditional broadcast media to issue the alerts when it is launched on Sunday, International Missing Children’s Day.

The scheme, the responsibility of the National Crime Agency (NCA) in partnership with the charity Missing People and the company Groupcall Limited, already has 25,000 people signed up.
End quote.

No doubt you will want to withdraw your claim that ''they just care about Maddie',   But I won't hold my breath eh?

Didn't Jimmy Saville raise millions of pounds for charity?

[faithlilly]

Unless you think our motives are in some way criminal ie: knowingly supporting criminals to evade justice I don't really see what is so shockingly awful about people defending the parents of a missing child online against the torrent of suspicion, abuse and vitriol that is heaped upon them on a daily basis.  OK, some of us (most of us?) might be considered obsessive if by that you mean we log on here every day to discuss the issue but I'd rather be considered an obsessive supporter of people that I believe to be innocent than an obsessive hate monger of people that I believe are hiding something.

Or conversely someone who helped deny a missing four year old justice. You pays yer money.......!

[Alfie]

Didn't Jimmy Saville raise millions of pounds for charity?

What exactly are you suggesting by that remark?  That the McCanns are like Jimmy Saville?  That anyone who raises millions of pounds for charity might also be a paedophile?  Elton John has raised millions for charity, should we remind people of Jimmy Saville when discussing his efforts too?

[G-Unit]

Unless you think our motives are in some way criminal ie: knowingly supporting criminals to evade justice I don't really see what is so shockingly awful about people defending the parents of a missing child online against the torrent of suspicion, abuse and vitriol that is heaped upon them on a daily basis.  OK, some of us (most of us?) might be considered obsessive if by that you mean we log on here every day to discuss the issue but I'd rather be considered an obsessive supporter of people that I believe to be innocent than an obsessive hate monger of people that I believe are hiding something.

I think we've finally got to the truth of the matter. " I'd rather be considered an obsessive supporter of people that I believe to be innocent"

It all rests on a belief in the innocence of the parents. The innocence of the parents is not a fact, it's a possibility. Others favour a different possibility. Labelling those with a different opinion 'hate mongers' is, in my opinion,  trolling. Trolling doesn't become acceptable just because the trolls believe they're right.

[faithlilly]

What exactly are you suggesting by that remark?  That the McCanns are like Jimmy Saville?  That anyone who raises millions of pounds for charity might also be a paedophile?  Elton John has raised millions for charity, should we remind people of Jimmy Saville when discussing his efforts too?

Of course I'm not suggesting that. What I am pointing out is that just because a person raises money for a charity does not necessarily mean they are good people.

[Alfie]

I think we've finally got to the truth of the matter. " I'd rather be considered an obsessive supporter of people that I believe to be innocent"

It all rests on a belief in the innocence of the parents. The innocence of the parents is not a fact, it's a possibility. Others favour a different possibility. Labelling those with a different opinion 'hate mongers' is, in my opinion,  trolling. Trolling doesn't become acceptable just because the trolls believe they're right.

What utter crap.  I didn't label those with a different opinion "hate mongers," I said that I would rather not be labelled a hate monger.  My comment was not trolling thank you. 

[stephen25000]

I think we've finally got to the truth of the matter. " I'd rather be considered an obsessive supporter of people that I believe to be innocent"

It all rests on a belief in the innocence of the parents. The innocence of the parents is not a fact, it's a possibility. Others favour a different possibility. Labelling those with a different opinion 'hate mongers' is, in my opinion,  trolling. Trolling doesn't become acceptable just because the trolls believe they're right.

In regards the second paragraph, it is also the propaganda they type, day after day.

Also, the attempts to belittle the intelligence and empathy level of 'sceptics' has been consistent throughout. All no doubt, part of the strategy.

Yet the clear hate invariably comes from some of the Mccann supporters.