Why are some people so obsessed in supporting the Mccanns ?

[Alfie]

Of course I'm not suggesting that. What I am pointing out is that just because a person raises money for a charity does not necessarily mean they are good people.

So you don't think the McCanns necessarily care about missing children or the welfare and well-being of the families of missing children despite the fact that they have raised thousands of pounds for the charity that supports them?  Just because the McCanns raise money for this charity by doing long bike rides and marathons we must not assume that it is because they give a stuff about other missing children?  Righty ho then.   

[Mr Gray]

In regards the second paragraph, it is also the propaganda they type, day after day.

Also, the attempts to belittle the intelligence and empathy level of 'sceptics' has been consistent throughout. All no doubt, part of the strategy.

Yet the clear hate invariably comes from some of the Mccann supporters.

What strategy would that be
The one in your imagination
We have 20,000 plus sceptics asking for a lie detector test which is unreliable
Based on that it s reasonable to question their intelligence

[stephen25000]

What strategy would that be
The one in your imagination
We have 20,000 plus sceptics asking for a lie detector test which is unreliable
Based on that it s reasonable to question their intelligence

You really don't read other peoples comments.

Do you.


A lie detector test is not going to happen.

As to reliability, that is a matter of debate.

[faithlilly]

So you don't think the McCanns necessarily care about missing children or the welfare and well-being of the families of missing children despite the fact that they have raised thousands of pounds for the charity that supports them?  Just because the McCanns raise money for this charity by doing long bike rides and marathons we must not assume that it is because they give a stuff about other missing children?  Righty ho then.

I think the McCanns receive good publicity for their endeavours.

It does seem though as if Kate and co do care for other missing people or why would their Facebook page promote the charity so heavily while relegating their daughter's image to one post sometime before Christmas ?

[Alfie]

I think the McCanns receive good publicity for their endeavours.

It does seem though as if Kate and co do care for other missing people or why would their Facebook page promote the charity so heavily while relegating their daughter's image to one post sometime before Christmas ?

See this is what I would call hate-mongering, of the most sophisticated variety - the suggestion that the McCanns care more about other missing children than their own missing child.  Subtle, but if you're the McCanns, still hateful. 

[Eleanor]

You really don't read other peoples comments.

Do you.


A lie detector test is not going to happen.

As to reliability, that is a matter of debate.

But it does rather prove the point about a large number of deluded obsessives.

[faithlilly]

See this is what I would call hate-mongering, of the most sophisticated variety - the suggestion that the McCanns care more about other missing children than their own missing child.  Subtle, but if you're the McCanns, still hateful.

So please correct me. Hasn't Madeleine's photograph only been promoted once before Christmas while MP has been promoted several times?

The official Ben Neddham site while promoting other missing people always had and continues to have Ben at the front and centre of their page.

[Montclair]

See this is what I would call hate-mongering, of the most sophisticated variety - the suggestion that the McCanns care more about other missing children than their own missing child.  Subtle, but if you're the McCanns, still hateful.

IMO the McCanns are not promoting anyone other than themselves.

[carlymichelle]

IMO the McCanns are not promoting anyone other than themselves.

totally agree with you

[G-Unit]

What utter crap.  I didn't label those with a different opinion "hate mongers," I said that I would rather not be labelled a hate monger.  My comment was not trolling thank you.

Who were you quoting Alfie? Please provide a cite for the term 'hate monger' if the phrase isn't your own. A cite for those labelling sceptics as 'hate mongers' would be helpful too.

[Mr Gray]

You really don't read other peoples comments.

Do you.


A lie detector test is not going to happen.

As to reliability, that is a matter of debate.

A matter of debate it is not
It's a matter of fact
Are you another that doesn't understand that

[stephen25000]

We are told they don't read social media and do not have social media accounts.

Then again.......

[carlymichelle]

We are told they don't read social media and do not have social media accounts.

Then again.......

no one believes  that

[G-Unit]

The person labelling sceptics as 'hate mongers' is you, it seems.

Edited to point out that this was a response to post 154.

[stephen25000]

no one believes  that

Indeed, there is evidence to show that some members of the Mccann's do.

Thanks to davel, and his reference to Birch.

Now Birch is a member of a certain Cadburys club.