Why are some people so obsessed in supporting the Mccanns ?

[stephen25000]

We only have to look at the evidence on which the McCanns were made arguidos to understand how incompetent they all where

Nah.

There was no evidence of abduction.

In any investigation, the parents would be suspects and investigated.


...and you know that.

[Mr Gray]

Nah.

There was no evidence of abduction.

In any investigation, the parents would be suspects and investigated.


...and you know that.

But they should not be deemed guilty as they were in this case because the police did not understand the evidence

[stephen25000]

But they should not be deemed guilty as they were in this case because the police did not understand the evidence

They weren't charged dave.

[G-Unit]

We only have to look at the evidence on which the McCanns were made arguidos to understand how incompetent they all where

People are made arguido when there's a possibility that they may incriminate themselves when answering police questions.

Some of the questions which Kate McCann declined to answer are quite interesting. They suggest that the PJ had reason to believe that she didn't find it easy caring for three small children, particularly Madeleine.

[faithlilly]

The child's name is Ben Needham.  So what if Madeleine's photograph has only been promoted once on Facebook compared to MP several times?  So what?  What conclusions would you like us to draw from your observation, and whilst we're at it may I say that your obsession with the OFM FB page is really quite odd IMO - you seem to monitor it very closely, why may I ask when you clear have such contempt for the McCanns, their webmaster, and the page generally?

What I do find odd is that the child whose disappearance the page has been set up to raise awareness of has almost no presence there. In fact if it wasn't for the public mentioning her name in posts you could be forgiven for thinking that it was a Missing People page.

[Eleanor]

What I do find odd is that the child whose disappearance the page has been set up to raise awareness of has almost no presence there. In fact if it wasn't for the public mentioning her name in posts you could be forgiven for thinking that it was a Missing People page.

And if Madeleine's face was all over the page you would say that The McCanns don't care about other missing children

[Mr Gray]

People are made arguido when there's a possibility that they may incriminate themselves when answering police questions.

Some of the questions which Kate McCann declined to answer are quite interesting. They suggest that the PJ had reason to believe that she didn't find it easy caring for three small children, particularly Madeleine.

many mothers do not find it easy caring for three small children.....the point is that the evidence cited was totally misunderstood by professionals who should understand these things....

[Robittybob1]

People are made arguido when there's a possibility that they may incriminate themselves when answering police questions.

Some of the questions which Kate McCann declined to answer are quite interesting. They suggest that the PJ had reason to believe that she didn't find it easy caring for three small children, particularly Madeleine.

Was that question relevant to the investigation?

[faithlilly]

And if Madeleine's face was all over the page you would say that The McCanns don't care about other missing children

Would I ?

Ben Needham's page seems to have struck a happy medium between raising awareness of other missing children however you are never in any doubt that this is Ben's page. The same, unfortunately, can't be said for Madeleine's.

[Eleanor]

Would I ?

Ben Needham's page seems to have struck a happy medium between raising awareness of other missing children however you are never in any doubt that this is Ben's page. The same, unfortunately, can't be said for Madeleine's.

So, The McCanns don't care about Madeleine.  Is that what you are saying?

[Robittybob1]

Would I ?

Ben Needham's page seems to have struck a happy medium between raising awareness of other missing children however you are never in any doubt that this is Ben's page. The same, unfortunately, can't be said for Madeleine's.

What page are we talking about? 

[G-Unit]

Was that question relevant to the investigation?

Considering the way the investigators were thinking this one might have been;

Asked whether or not it is true that in England she was thinking to deliver MADELEINE into the custody [guardianship] of a family member, she did not respond.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATE-MCCANN_07-09-07.htm

[Robittybob1]

Considering the way the investigators were thinking this one might have been;

Asked whether or not it is true that in England she was thinking to deliver MADELEINE into the custody [guardianship] of a family member, she did not respond.
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/KATE-MCCANN_07-09-07.htm

Even if that was true, did she need to answer that question?  Answer  No.

[Mr Gray]

Even if that was true, did she need to answer that question?  Answer  No.

she didnt respond because it was a stupid question asked by police who did not understand the evidence

[Alfie]

What I do find odd is that the child whose disappearance the page has been set up to raise awareness of has almost no presence there. In fact if it wasn't for the public mentioning her name in posts you could be forgiven for thinking that it was a Missing People page.

Every time the Webmaster posts the post appears along side a picture of Madeleine.  Madeleine's age progression picture heads the page.  The page is called "Official Find Madeleine" page.  For the umpteenth time you are making something out of nothing for mischevious reasons.  Grow up.