The Earlier Reports Made about the case

[[...]]

Continuing with these Running photos....


I will deal with each image at a time... Will make my posts clearer I hope.....

The image I have attached to me appears to be two seperate people running on a road... Together ????

I will explain why I don't believe this image....

This Event is suposed to be in June 2010...  I can find an image of Tanja running on her own in this event which I will also add a link to... I cannot find any written documentation on this event... I don't know where it is...

Image 2 is from the link.... And Dr Vincent Tabak isn't right next to her !!

First link:  http://londonnewspictures.photoshelter.com/image/I0000AV4X9GNbhy8


Notice the difference between the two pictures... I believe they are what would be a standard race image when you enter an event... there's always at least one image unless you win which tends to be taken at the half way stage of the race...

I have added a third image of both images side by side...... you can see Tanja Morson has the same expression on her face in both images... the only problem is The man posing as Dr Vincent Tabak has been added ... you can clearly see this ..... And there is a blurred out dark object behind the man .... posing as Dr Vincent Tabak pretending to run with Tanaj Morson... (IMO)...

Fourth image show a black square on Tanaj Morsons left shoulder... which doesn't appear in her Official Photo that was taken in June 2010

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jo-yeates-murder-suspect-vincent-105911

[attachment deleted by admin]

[mrswah]

"Between" 16th and 26th December is obviously not intended to include either of the mentioned dates, as we all know full well that Joanna was alive on the 16th, and dead on the 26th.

"Between" 16th and 19th December indicates that the police thought Joanna died on the 17th or 18th.

Why this was than changed to go right up to the 25th, is a mystery, I agree!  Somebody, somewhere, must have thought it very possible that she died later than the 18th.  But who????

[[...]]

"Between" 16th and 26th December is obviously not intended to include either of the mentioned dates, as we all know full well that Joanna was alive on the 16th, and dead on the 26th.

"Between" 16th and 19th December indicates that the police thought Joanna died on the 17th or 18th.

Why this was than changed to go right up to the 25th, is a mystery, I agree!  Somebody, somewhere, must have thought it very possible that she died later than the 18th.  But who????

But My question is why originally in January 2011... was it between the 16th December and the 26th December 2010... and could it be because of that was the date the "Post Mortem" was carried out?

I didn't think it was possible to change the date of a charge like that... Is it normal???

[[...]]

BDP... Reports....

JO YEATES
24/12/2010
Our thoughts are with the family and friends and colleagues of Jo Yeates, landscape architect in our Bristol studio, whose disappearance and tragic death over the Christmas period remain a mystery.

STATEMENT FROM KEITH PAVEY, HEAD OF BDP’S BRISTOL STUDIO
"We are struggling to come to terms with the tragic and untimely death of our colleague Jo Yeates. She was a very popular member of staff and a  talented and committed professional with a rewarding career in front of her. She will be sorely missed and our heartfelt thoughts go out to her parents, Teresa and David,  and to her long-term partner Greg, who is an architect with BDP, also in Bristol. We are currently considering the most appropriate way of remembering Jo and will issue a further statement in due course."

How did they know this on the 24th December 2010???

This is extremely strange... The Article Date is the 24th December 2010 which they cannot change just as my post date will be...  5th June 2017 ...

So how Did BDP.... manage to write an Article on there own website.. The Day before she was "Officially Found"????

http://www.bdp.com/en/latest/news/2010/Jo-Yeates/

I'm surprised that they didn't have an employee photograph of Joanna yeates .. But not as surprised as I am about them knowing she was dead the day before.....




[attachment deleted by admin]

[Leonora]

Why are there no lawyers out there looking at this case ?? Everything about it screams.. Totally wrong... nothing adds up whatsoever ... Nothing makes sense whatsoever... I spoke to the "Dutchie' this weekend he's as baffled as me... he can't understand why the Dutch embassy haven't got involved ....

I wonder if the Dutch Embassy are fully aware as to what has taken place?? If the are under the Impression that with having The Complex Crime Unit Involved and other charges held on file that they cannot do anything for Dr Vincent Tabak.... Well I hope someone from The Dutch Embassy reads this subject on this forum... and someone starts making some noise ... and sooner rather than later ...(IMO)...

After Vincent Tabak's lawyers abandoned any attempt to apply for bail, one of Noel O'Gara's associates wrote a forthright letter to the consular staff at the Royal Netherlands Embassy, telling them it was their job to provide the accused with a more competent lawyer. I never saw any response from them.

I am confident that the diplomats knew a lot more about this case than we can ever hope to know.

I'm glad you have talked about the case to someone with Dutch connections, as I rarely seem to meet any.

[[...]]

After Vincent Tabak's lawyers abandoned any attempt to apply for bail, one of Noel O'Gara's associates wrote a forthright letter to the consular staff at the Royal Netherlands Embassy, telling them it was their job to provide the accused with a more competent lawyer. I never saw any response from them.

I am confident that the diplomats knew a lot more about this case than we can ever hope to know.

I'm glad you have talked about the case to someone with Dutch connections, as I rarely seem to meet any.

Being a Dutchman.. he will have Dutch connections 

Who's Peter Randall? while I'm at it ?? Name rings a bell

[[...]]

Pavey said: “It is now over seven weeks since Jo was so tragically taken from us and it is still difficult to come to terms with her untimely and unnecessary death.

What an odd statement???

http://www.bdonline.co.uk/bdp-colleagues-launch-tributes-to-joanna-yeates/5012783.article

[mrswah]

I wouldn't take too much notice of the fact that BDP dated their article 24th December. That was their last working day before Christmas. The article would have been one of the first things they published on returning to work after Christmas, and I expect they just forgot to adjust the date. Just my opinion, anyway, but I cannot see how anyone from BDP would be involved in knowing Joanna was dead before anyone else did.

[AerialHunter]

Continuing with these Running photos....


I will deal with each image at a time... Will make my posts clearer I hope.....

The image I have attached to me appears to be two seperate people running on a road... Together ????

I will explain why I don't believe this image....

This Event is suposed to be in June 2010...  I can find an image of Tanja running on her own in this event which I will also add a link to... I cannot find any written documentation on this event... I don't know where it is...

Image 2 is from the link.... And Dr Vincent Tabak isn't right next to her !!

First link:  http://londonnewspictures.photoshelter.com/image/I0000AV4X9GNbhy8


Notice the difference between the two pictures... I believe they are what would be a standard race image when you enter an event... there's always at least one image unless you win which tends to be taken at the half way stage of the race...

I have added a third image of both images side by side...... you can see Tanja Morson has the same expression on her face in both images... the only problem is The man posing as Dr Vincent Tabak has been added ... you can clearly see this ..... And there is a blurred out dark object behind the man .... posing as Dr Vincent Tabak pretending to run with Tanaj Morson... (IMO)...

Fourth image show a black square on Tanaj Morsons left shoulder... which doesn't appear in her Official Photo that was taken in June 2010

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jo-yeates-murder-suspect-vincent-105911

This mark is the equivalent of a cartographers error. The owner of the photo may have placed the mark in order to be able to spot the photo as his/hers if it is reproduced anywhere else without permission when a fee may be chargeable. Not unusual for photographers to use this and similar methods to facilitate instant recognition.

And for those of you wondering what a cartographers error is, if you take a map painstakingly created by a cartographer  (map drawing man) you will find deliberate errors incorporated so the cartographer can spot that a map is actually reproduced from his own hard work. You can see things like extra bends in rivers, contour lines that show a shape different to an actual hill, bits cut out of woodland etc etc.

AH

[[...]]

Regarding the "Pizza and The Note".... I have attached an article from "The Press Reader" which says That "The Landlord recieved The Pizza and Note" on the 27th December 2010...

I remeber Colin Port talking about going back for the CCTV footage and not gaining access... And having to return to collect the CCTV Unit itself...

Now when he states in his written statement that the 'Landlord" wasn't there... he omitted a couple of details...

MAINLY..........

Mr Colin Port
If I look at the chronology, on 22 December, we visited the place. We took away a short period of CCTV. We then widened the parameters regarding that and we went back. We looked at the piece of equipment. Because we needed to have a bigger download, we needed to take it away. We were satisfied that the particular piece of equipment that was there was robust and would stay the course so we then went back on the 4th. On the 27th, the place was closed, I think, or during the week of the 27th the place was closed. On the 4th, a technician went back, seized the whole unit and there was a reporter there. So what we would say and what we are saying is we seized the CCTV and it wasn't because the Daily Mirror had raised it with us.

So according to "Colin Port"... "The Ram was closed" during the week of "The 27th December 2010...

There are lots to contemplate with this statement....

(A): When did the Landlord of "The Ram" inform the Police of the "Pizza and Note"??

(B): Why did they not track him down immediateley to see this Pizza and Note"

(C): Knowing that 'The Ram was closed the week of 27th December 2010.. did that not raise suspicions ??

(D): Was Dr Vincent tabak refering to "The Landlord of "The Ram"??

(E): Was this the reason the Police "Flew to Holland"??


Why was the Ram closed on "The 27th December 2010" or During The week of The 27th December 2010" as Colin Port has stated ???

The 27th December is a significant Date.... That was the day they confirmed that Joanna Yeates had been "Murdered"... why were they not getting more information on anyone linked to "The Ram"... ???

If it took them till The 4th January 2011... to go back to "The Ram"... that in itself indicats that it was closed for about a week.... Because we have 2 important pieces of evidence to collect... Firstly The CCTV Unit.... And more importantly "The Pizza and Note..."   so why was this pub closed for about a week at the most "Busiest Time " of The Year ????

http://leveson.sayit.mysociety.org/hearing-27-march-2012/mr-colin-port

[mrswah]

Quite possible that the Ram was closed Christmas week------as I do know it closes on Sundays!

[[...]]

 Monday 31 Jan 2011 1:07 pm

Ms Yeates’ Dutch neighbour Vincent Tabak has been charged with her murder, and is due to stand trial in October of this year, with the start provisionally set for the 4th of the month.

Mr Tabak has already appeared at Bristol Crown Court to hear the charges against him and a case management hearing is due to take place on May 4th.

Is it usual to know so much information so early on about when and where court dates are set??

http://metro.co.uk/2011/01/31/joanna-yeates-new-photos-released-as-vincent-tabak-trial-set-for-october-634616/

[Leonora]

Monday 31 Jan 2011 1:07 pm
http://metro.co.uk/2011/01/31/joanna-yeates-new-photos-released-as-vincent-tabak-trial-set-for-october-634616/

The declared purpose of the hearing on 31st January 2011 at Bristol Crown Court was to agree on a timetable for the case. The judge was Mr Colman Treacy - who expected to hear the case himself - as he
Is it usual to know so much information so early on about when and where court dates are set??
"pencilled in the date of 4th October for the trial".

The date of the plea and case management hearing was set for 4th May 2011 IN THIS COURT. As we all know, this hearing was moved to 5th May in a sinister court at the Old Bailey, before a DIFFERENT JUDGE. I feel 100% confident that we can conclude that Vincent Tabak had REFUSED to plead guilty of manslaughter, as Paul Cook had evidently tried to persuade him to do after his appearance before the Magistrate.

"I am going to tell you something that will shock you", he told Peter Brotherton. "You tell me and we will see", came the answer.

[[...]]

25 December 2010
 From the section Bristol

In a delicate operation that could take all day, investigators are trying to retrieve the body - which has not been identified - without damaging any evidence at the scene, said BBC reporter Richard Greenaway.

Why was this "Delicate Operation" going to take all day to retrieve Joanna Yeates ????

Andrew Mott and Martin Faithful both described trying to stop the body from Thawing... We know she wasn't stuck to the Frozen Ground on the Grass Verge... Andrew Mott in his testomony describes The Two as In seperate..

Mott says the body and ground were frozen. Defence asks about a broom handle used to help feed straps under the body.
2 minutes ago

Yet he states the obvious... And doesn't say that Joanna Yeates was frozen to the Ground!!! as we were all lead to believe...


The only reason it could take all day is AGAIN.... Her body was in a different Location to what they lead us to believe !!!

This article is dated 25th December 2010..!!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-12079050

[John]

Continuing with these Running photos....

The image I have attached to me appears to be two seperate people running on a road... Together ????

I will explain why I don't believe this image....

This Event is suposed to be in June 2010...  I can find an image of Tanja running on her own in this event which I will also add a link to... I cannot find any written documentation on this event... I don't know where it is...

I agree, the photo certainly appears to be an amateurish attempt at photoshopping for some reason?