Author Topic: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?  (Read 550691 times)

0 Members and 59 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ActualMat

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #390 on: May 03, 2018, 06:52:50 PM »
Honestly!  8()(((@#

Wow they are disgusting misleading pieces of trash.

Offline puglove

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #391 on: May 03, 2018, 06:58:50 PM »
Lookout said Bamber sent her a Christmas card. She once disputed a piece of evidence saying Bamber sent her a letter regarding this. This letter was never posted on the forum.

Lookout writes regularly to Bamber, giving him all her news and updating him on the case.


I would imagine that he looks forwards to those letters immensely.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Nicholas

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #393 on: May 03, 2018, 07:11:39 PM »


According to Bambers letter to Julie he says not a day passes that he doesn't think of her

Hardly supportive of his claims Julie was a scorned women.

Why would she be scorned if it was clear he was still chasing after her?

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Caroline

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #394 on: May 03, 2018, 07:13:19 PM »
According to Bambers letter to Julie he says not a day passes that he doesn't think of her

Hardly supportive of his claims Julie was a scorned women.

Why would she be scorned if it was clear he was still chasing after her?



I bet that's true!  @)(++(*

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #395 on: May 03, 2018, 07:14:54 PM »
Lookout writes regularly to Bamber, giving him all her news and updating him on the case.


I would imagine that he looks forwards to those letters immensely.

I wonder if she's also on his rotating phone list?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #396 on: May 03, 2018, 07:19:34 PM »
I bet that's true!  @)(++(*

Didn't Bamber send Julie another letter where he attempts to butter her up with smoochy words, or am I mistaken?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline puglove

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #397 on: May 03, 2018, 07:21:35 PM »
Didn't Bamber send Julie another letter where he attempts to butter her up with smoochy words, or am I mistaken?

I think that was to Lookout.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #398 on: May 03, 2018, 07:31:48 PM »
I think that was to Lookout.

Lookout claims today:

"Poor poor Jeremy has repeatedly been saying what his father used to say------" it'll all come out in the wash ". By the time this case is over it'll resemble a Chinese laundry. http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9010.msg438571.html#msg438571
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #399 on: May 03, 2018, 07:37:04 PM »
 @)(++(*

The campaign team have retweeted Mike O'Brien today

Jeremy Bamber Retweeted
Michael O'Brien
@mobrien1967
·
1h
Its better to fight with truth and honesty than with lies and deceit.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Bambertweets

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9166.msg447213#msg447213
« Last Edit: May 03, 2018, 07:46:55 PM by Stephanie »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline adam

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #400 on: May 03, 2018, 07:41:44 PM »
Lookout writes regularly to Bamber, giving him all her news and updating him on the case.


I would imagine that he looks forwards to those letters immensely.

It is surprising that she has only used a Bamber letter once when giving an apparent source. The apparent letter then not being posted.

Usually Lookout says 'find it yourself', 'use you're eyes' or 'it's on the forum somewhere', when responding to a source request.

Offline APRIL

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #401 on: May 03, 2018, 07:48:37 PM »
Didn't Bamber send Julie another letter where he attempts to butter her up with smoochy words, or am I mistaken?

Is that the one in which he calls her "Stinker"?

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #402 on: May 03, 2018, 07:50:45 PM »
Is that the one in which he calls her "Stinker"?

That's the one April. Any ideas where I might find it?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Caroline

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #403 on: May 03, 2018, 07:56:35 PM »
The Sheila Alive rubbish also dredges up the old myth that police were in conversation with someone inside the farm. This means Sheila while Jeremy was sitting in a police car in Pages Lane! Billhooks!

The log states that at 05:25 "Firearms team are in conversation with a person from inside the farm". The extract from Collin's WS shows that JUST PRIOR to making the loud hailer challenge to the house, he was in conversation with Jeremy - Jeremy was the person mentioned in the log and quite clearly, at this point, he was NOT in a car in Pages Lane, in fact after his conversation with Collin's he went to phone Julie.

They then make a challenge to 'persons inside the farmhouse' and this was met with no response. It's clear when you read everything in context what happened. They spoke to Bamber (the person from inside the farm). But later challenges to persons the house - were met with no response.

The CT keep flogging this dead horse and it just makes them sound as if they haven't even grasped the basics!

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #404 on: May 03, 2018, 08:16:47 PM »
The Sheila Alive rubbish also dredges up the old myth that police were in conversation with someone inside the farm. This means Sheila while Jeremy was sitting in a police car in Pages Lane! Billhooks!

The log states that at 05:25 "Firearms team are in conversation with a person from inside the farm". The extract from Collin's WS shows that JUST PRIOR to making the loud hailer challenge to the house, he was in conversation with Jeremy - Jeremy was the person mentioned in the log and quite clearly, at this point, he was NOT in a car in Pages Lane, in fact after his conversation with Collin's he went to phone Julie.

They then make a challenge to 'persons inside the farmhouse' and this was met with no response. It's clear when you read everything in context what happened. They spoke to Bamber (the person from inside the farm). But later challenges to persons the house - were met with no response.

The CT keep flogging this dead horse and it just makes them sound as if they haven't even grasped the basics!

Great post Caroline!

"And she does like to be told she's pretty and she likes to make herself up"  What a f....ing mass murdering tosser he was and is!
« Last Edit: May 03, 2018, 08:20:00 PM by Stephanie »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation