Author Topic: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?  (Read 582822 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline adam

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #570 on: May 10, 2018, 07:00:58 AM »
This was posted on Blue on the 24th April 2018 -

'This forum has been marvellously useful to me. It has given me the opportunity to ask a few questions and examine photos and documents in detail.

I joined with the purpose of confirming my suspicion that Bamber may be innocent. It has in fact lead me to believe that he is totally guilty and justifiably locked away.

I've been amazed by the whacky theories that some of his supporters put forward, and find myself shocked that even from his cell he continues to mislead the gullible.

Thank you for the opportunity to weigh up the evidence, my mind and conscience are now clear as to the truth of this matter. Over and out.'

----------

David tried to deflect blame onto Mike. However the poster did say 'some of his supporters'.  David,  Lookout, Roch, Nugs & Nigel had all posted during the 10 days the poster was viewing.
« Last Edit: May 10, 2018, 07:08:57 AM by adam »

Offline Real justice

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #571 on: May 10, 2018, 07:56:24 AM »
Mike's, Nugs, Lookout's & Nigel's posts will prevent a lot of new people from becoming supporters. Which is why Bamber wanted the forum shut down.

David's forum role as Bamber fire fighter has now gone unless he starts disagreeing with fellow supporters. But the moderators won't let him use his images on supporters.

JackieD says Bamber is guilty because Julie identified the twins. Roch's main argument is he says he's seen evidence which 'shows Sheila is definately the killer'. But won't say whether Bamber has this evidence.

People taking a new interest in the case are just as likely to stumble across the Blue forum, as they are to view the OS.
I think they’ve got what they wanted all along Adam, if you prove Tesko is lying your out. 

Looks like the licience has been extended for ten years?

http://website.informer.com/jeremybamberforum.co.uk

Offline Angelo222

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #572 on: May 10, 2018, 10:33:58 AM »
Mike's, Nugs, Lookout's & Nigel's posts will prevent a lot of new people from becoming supporters. Which is why Bamber wanted the forum shut down.

David's forum role as Bamber fire fighter has now gone unless he starts disagreeing with fellow supporters. But the moderators won't let him use his images on supporters.

JackieD says Bamber is guilty because Julie identified the twins. Roch's main argument is he says he's seen evidence which 'shows Sheila is definately the killer'. But won't say whether Bamber has this evidence.

People taking a new interest in the case are just as likely to stumble across the Blue forum, as they are to view the OS.

Roch isn't a bad chappie but his innocence arguments are non existent.  Personally I think he is sceptical about Bamber too but can't bring himself to admit it publicly.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Nicholas

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Caroline

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #574 on: May 10, 2018, 01:03:40 PM »
29 votes https://mobile.twitter.com/jbcampaignltd/status/994172464992317440  @)(++(*

Wow! 29 people? There was more than that in the post office queue yesterday  @)(++(*

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #575 on: May 10, 2018, 01:09:41 PM »
Wow! 29 people? There was more than that in the post office queue yesterday  @)(++(*

Arh but it doesn't mean 29 people took the quiz  @)(++(*
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Caroline

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #576 on: May 10, 2018, 01:14:36 PM »
Arh but it doesn't mean 29 people took the quiz  @)(++(*

Nor did they all think he passed  @)(++(*

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #577 on: May 10, 2018, 01:21:19 PM »
Nor did they all think he passed  @)(++(*

I wonder if Lookout was in the 10%?  @)(++(*
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #578 on: May 10, 2018, 01:23:14 PM »
Nasty Nigel is now claiming, "SHEILA (God bless her) was 'grooming' this young girl HELEN GRIMSTER for possible helping with 'The Plan'. http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,9435.msg438982.html#msg438982  *&^^&
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Real justice

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #579 on: May 10, 2018, 01:29:17 PM »
Wow! 29 people? There was more than that in the post office queue yesterday  @)(++(*
@)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*

Offline Caroline

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #580 on: May 10, 2018, 01:56:40 PM »
Even MORE hilarous is the fact that only 6 people liked the post and one of those was Trudie B, one was JB Campaign LTD (which is also Trudie), one was Bamber Tweets (probably Trudie again) another is Heidi from the CT and one was Dee Sadler (the actress they've roped in.  @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* - not sure who the other one is but way to go! (A long way to go!)  8((()*/


Offline Real justice

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #581 on: May 10, 2018, 02:27:04 PM »
Even MORE hilarous is the fact that only 6 people liked the post and one of those was Trudie B, one was JB Campaign LTD (which is also Trudie), one was Bamber Tweets (probably Trudie again) another is Heidi from the CT and one was Dee Sadler (the actress they've roped in.  @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* - not sure who the other one is but way to go! (A long way to go!)  8((()*/
@)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #582 on: May 10, 2018, 03:08:33 PM »
Even MORE hilarous is the fact that only 6 people liked the post and one of those was Trudie B, one was JB Campaign LTD (which is also Trudie), one was Bamber Tweets (probably Trudie again) another is Heidi from the CT and one was Dee Sadler (the actress they've roped in.  @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(* - not sure who the other one is but way to go! (A long way to go!)  8((()*/

Ahahaha  @)(++(* @)(++(* @)(++(*
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #583 on: May 13, 2018, 04:09:39 PM »
I wonder if Trudi Benjamin has ever bothered to ask Bamber why he never mentioned what he allegedly saw in the WHF window (whilst outside with the 2 police officers) during his MURDER trial?

She appears to believe Bambers BS on this  *&^^&

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q0HnzXwa0mA

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=215.0
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Caroline

Re: The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?
« Reply #584 on: May 15, 2018, 07:03:45 PM »
That lot are exploiting the name of Martin Luther King now on Bamber Twits!  @)(++(* @)(++(*

https://twitter.com/Bambertweets?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor