The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?

[Holly Goodhead]

Are you by any chance feeding into ‘idealisations’ behind the scenes Holly ?

and do you remember stating this?

“I know I would feel devastated if proved wrong re JB or he admitted to being responsible.”

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=9392.msg457433#msg457433

I am interested in the case from the adoption angle and on the basis I believe JB is a moj. 

[Holly Goodhead]

Wow, to say you’d feel DEVASTATED if Jeremy admitted he was responsible sounds like you’re emotionally involved , Holly!

It also sounds like you’ve got “other” reasons to be defending him for so many years. I don’t know how often you’ve visited him — which are brief one-hour visits under scrutiny from guards, so hardly normal — but even if he writes to you daily; calls you on the phone; you don’t TRULY know him. So if he did eventually admit to the murders he’s been found guilty of, why would you feel devastated when he’s just a contact of yours?

Quickly going on to this you wrote:


“But it does show the police didn't accept what they were told by JB at face value otherwise they would have left Crispy to his own devices and not been concerned with protecting soc.”


When the police raided WHF they didn’t know what to expect. When they found Crispy cowering under the bed, their immediate action was to contain him for obvious reasons. Do you seriously think they’d not have regardless of what they thought of JB? It’s STANDARD procedure, and he’d have been the last thing on the police officers minds when they kept Crispy out the way of dead bodies!

Devastated was probably the wrong word.  Let's go for disappointed.  Disappointed that my judgement was so poor 

I've never met JB or spoken with him on the phone and the last time I communicated with him via mail was nearly 2 years ago.

[Holly Goodhead]

I've edited and removed a number of posts which contained personal comments.

I would advise those who consider JB is or might be a MoJ not to reveal any personal info as unfortunately it seems to be used against you whether it be AA's contact with JB or G-Unit's experience of a naughty dog! 

[Nicholas]

I've edited and removed a number of posts which contained personal comments.

I would advise those who consider JB is or might be a MoJ not to reveal any personal info as unfortunately it seems to be used against you whether it be AA's contact with JB or G-Unit's experience of a naughty dog!

If Aunt Agatha or anyone else wishes to reveal any information about Bamber that they’ve felt they cannot reveal until now, they should be encouraged to do so

What are you playing at Holly?

[Myster]

Bamber is on lockdown in his prison cell (Well, I never!) and a lot more baloney is coming to light... LOL!!!

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/killer-jeremy-bambers-chilling-coronavirus-21898177

[The General]

Bamber is on lockdown in his prison cell (Well, I never!) and a lot more baloney is coming to light... LOL!!!

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/killer-jeremy-bambers-chilling-coronavirus-21898177

"...the case is always evolving". Not from where I'm standing it's not. In his head maybe.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

I've edited and removed a number of posts which contained personal comments.

I would advise those who consider JB is or might be a MoJ not to reveal any personal info as unfortunately it seems to be used against you whether it be AA's contact with JB or G-Unit's experience of a naughty dog!

Isn’t that biased trying to make rules whereby people can’t tell the truth; give facts; accounts; ideas; details; first-hand knowledge they have of JB;  opinions...especially on a JUSTICE board?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Bamber is on lockdown in his prison cell (Well, I never!) and a lot more baloney is coming to light... LOL!!!

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/killer-jeremy-bambers-chilling-coronavirus-21898177

The press can’t stand him can they...

I bet they roll their eyes when they see those same tired words again and again and again “New evidence has come to light”

[mrswah]

The press can’t stand him can they...

I bet they roll their eyes when they see those same tired words again and again and again “New evidence has come to light”

Maybe they can't stand him, but he's very useful to them for selling newspapers, just as Myra Hindley was.

[G-Unit]

Isn’t that biased trying to make rules whereby people can’t tell the truth; give facts; accounts; ideas; details; first-hand knowledge they have of JB;  opinions...especially on a JUSTICE board?

Personal remarks aimed at other posters are against forum rules so are properly removed.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Personal remarks aimed at other posters are against forum rules so are properly removed.

Holly wasn’t discussing just personal remarks — she advised people not to reveal information about Jeremy Bamber — which doesn’t help him or anyone else. Withholding knowledge doesn’t make for a good forum...

[Nicholas]

Holly wasn’t discussing just personal remarks — she advised people not to reveal information about Jeremy Bamber — which doesn’t help him or anyone else. Withholding knowledge doesn’t make for a good forum...

No it doesn’t

As asked before - what’s she playing at?

[The General]

No it doesn’t

As asked before - what’s she playing at?

I agree, it's needless censorship. Maybe even driven by bias.

[Nicholas]

I agree, it's needless censorship. Maybe even driven by bias.

And if Aunt Agatha has suffered abuse she shouldn’t be being warned by anyone to keep it to herself

[Nicholas]

I agree, it's needless censorship. Maybe even driven by bias.

Bias, personality who knows?