The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?

[Nicholas]

Jeremy does not know what happened that night as he wasn’t there.

He arrived later on and was found guilty on falsified evidence.

Jeremy had no defence as he didn’t know what he was up against.

What falsified evidence ?

[Aunt Agatha]

Did Jeremy actually tell you this?

This was early days. We I’d t know but we questioned whether someone else could have done it, yes. However, Jeremy knew he was innocent but had no idea who or how he was framed.

By proving Sheila could not have committed the crime, Jeremy was found guilty by default.

[Nicholas]

Jeremy does not know what happened that night as he wasn’t there.

He arrived later on and was found guilty on falsified evidence.

Jeremy had no defence as he didn’t know what he was up against.

If he didn’t know who did it he should have told the police that - not you

[Caroline]

This was early days. We I’d t know but we questioned whether someone else could have done it, yes. However, Jeremy knew he was innocent but had no idea who or how he was framed.

By proving Sheila could not have committed the crime, Jeremy was found guilty by default.

But he told you his dad was in the Masons?

[Nicholas]

This was early days. We I’d t know but we questioned whether someone else could have done it, yes. However, Jeremy knew he was innocent but had no idea who or how he was framed.

By proving Sheila could not have committed the crime, Jeremy was found guilty by default.

You didn’t know him in the early days - you met him years later when he had no one

[puglove]

The police had to be called.  Jeremy is not going to go to the house without calling the police.  Both Jeremy and the police had to be on site at the same time to frame Jeremy.  If Jeremy wasn’t framed people would be looking for someone else.  Whoever oversaw the immediate operation, ensured that things where in place, or as much as could be.

But apparently, Nevill didn't tell Bamber to call the police, just to "come quick."

Oh blimey, Aunty Aggs.


        

[Aunt Agatha]

What falsified evidence ?

The silencer for one.

Jeremys character has been torn to pieces, he isNOT the man he is portrayed to be.  This had to be done to ensure the jury found him guilty. 

[Nicholas]

But he told you his dad was in the Masons?

His dad was in the RAF Caroline

[Nicholas]

The silencer for one.

Jeremys character has been torn to pieces, he isNOT the man he is portrayed to be.  This had to be done to ensure the jury found him guilty.

What had to be done?

[Aunt Agatha]

If he didn’t know who did it he should have told the police that - not you

He did!  That was part of his defence.  He couldn’t prove it was anybody else he was too busy trying to defend himself.  He told everybody he was innocent.  He didn’t know whether Sheila did it or not.  He only knew what he was told.

He was just the patsy.

[Common sense]

Jeremy does not know what happened that night as he wasn’t there.

He arrived later on and was found guilty on falsified evidence.

Jeremy had no defence as he didn’t know what he was up against.

so was Julie Mugford part of this operation to frame Jeremy from the beginning or was she threatened to force her to tell her lies later?

Do you think it's wise even talking about this in case they know you are on to them? I wouldn't want you having an "accident"

[Aunt Agatha]

But he told you his dad was in the Masons?

Yes he did!!

[Aunt Agatha]

You didn’t know him in the early days - you met him years later when he had no one

Early days compared to everyone else.  I knew him in 1990.

[Nicholas]

He did!  That was part of his defence.  He couldn’t prove it was anybody else he was too busy trying to defend himself.  He told everybody he was innocent.  He didn’t know whether Sheila did it or not.  He only knew what he was told.

He was just the patsy.

If he didn’t know ‘whether Sheila did it or not’ then it couldn’t have been a hitman could it ?

[APRIL]

Jeremy does not know what happened that night as he wasn’t there.

He arrived later on and was found guilty on falsified evidence.

Jeremy had no defence as he didn’t know what he was up against.

Well, if it wasn't Jeremy who gave you the information, it means that someone else -in a high place?- knew about it, too, and it wouldn't have been Nevill. Had it been, Jeremy wouldn't have been living his playboy life style.