The Jeremy Supporters : Help, Hindrance or Harmful?

[Aunt Agatha]

The basis of my theory comes from conversations with Jeremy, casual chats, memories he's had etc. Listening to how his family raised him etc.... We just chatted and chatted and chatted... About everything and had some great laughs to. It was not all case study, far from it.

Jeremy has no idea of any of my views, of my posting on here etc.  This is my own belief of what could possibly have happened that fatal evening,.

[APRIL]

He has not permitted it. He doesn't know what I think.

You were with him for an extraordinarily long time -some 18 years, I think you mentioned. Are you saying that, in all that time, despite that he claimed to have no idea what had occurred -I believe you said "we had no idea"- you never shared any of your own thoughts with him?

[APRIL]

The basis of my theory comes from conversations with Jeremy, casual chats, memories he's had etc. Listening to how his family raised him etc.... We just chatted and chatted and chatted... About everything and had some great laughs to. It was not all case study, far from it.

Jeremy has no idea of any of my views, of my posting on here etc.  This is my own belief of what could possibly have happened that fatal evening,.

Your conclusions have certainly taken you down a route, which I, and I feel fairly certain, others, would find difficult to take on board.

[puglove]

The basis of my theory comes from conversations with Jeremy, casual chats, memories he's had etc. Listening to how his family raised him etc.... We just chatted and chatted and chatted... About everything and had some great laughs to. It was not all case study, far from it.

Jeremy has no idea of any of my views, of my posting on here etc.  This is my own belief of what could possibly have happened that fatal evening,.

I bet he does know that you're on here, Ags. Ermintrood and her herd will be keeping him posted.

[Nicholas]

The basis of my theory comes from conversations with Jeremy, casual chats, memories he's had etc. Listening to how his family raised him etc.... We just chatted and chatted and chatted... About everything and had some great laughs to. It was not all case study, far from it.

Jeremy has no idea of any of my views, of my posting on here etc.  This is my own belief of what could possibly have happened that fatal evening,.

Not dissimilar to JM then

[Aunt Agatha]

You were with him for an extraordinarily long time -some 18 years, I think you mentioned. Are you saying that, in all that time, despite that he claimed to have no idea what had occurred -I believe you said "we had no idea"- you never shared any of your own thoughts with him?

Yes, I shared my thoughts but if he was reluctant to go down that road then there was nothing I could do.  You cannot keep repeating the same mantra for 18yrs.

For many years there was no further disclosure than what we knew.  Only when evidence came forward was Jeremy able to examine it. 

My theory and research is based only on what we knew before all these disclosures, which I refer to as smoke and mirrors.

It was a very simple plan and it fits in with everything that has been posted regarding the early days.

The evidence disclosed later has only muddied the waters, has caused confusion and exposed this cover up due to failings and dishonesty.

[Nicholas]

You were with him for an extraordinarily long time -some 18 years, I think you mentioned. Are you saying that, in all that time, despite that he claimed to have no idea what had occurred -I believe you said "we had no idea"- you never shared any of your own thoughts with him?

It appears Bamber’s public innocence fraud campaign didn’t start until around the time he discarded AA ?

[APRIL]

Yes, I shared my thoughts but if he was reluctant to go down that road then there was nothing I could do.  You cannot keep repeating the same mantra for 18yrs.

For many years there was no further disclosure than what we knew.  Only when evidence came forward was Jeremy able to examine it. 

My theory and research is based only on what we knew before all these disclosures, which I refer to as smoke and mirrors.

It was a very simple plan and it fits in with everything that has been posted regarding the early days.

The evidence disclosed later has only muddied the waters, has caused confusion and exposed this cover up due to failings and dishonesty.

But for your theory to work, it requires Nevill to have been a member of a group for which you have no love, so I'm surprised that you didn't check out that very basic fact with Jeremy.

[Nicholas]

Yes, I shared my thoughts but if he was reluctant to go down that road then there was nothing I could do.  You cannot keep repeating the same mantra for 18yrs.

For many years there was no further disclosure than what we knew.  Only when evidence came forward was Jeremy able to examine it. 

My theory and research is based only on what we knew before all these disclosures, which I refer to as smoke and mirrors.

It was a very simple plan and it fits in with everything that has been posted regarding the early days.

The evidence disclosed later has only muddied the waters, has caused confusion and exposed this cover up due to failings and dishonesty.

How did evidence come forward ?

[Caroline]

Yes, I shared my thoughts but if he was reluctant to go down that road then there was nothing I could do.  You cannot keep repeating the same mantra for 18yrs.

For many years there was no further disclosure than what we knew.  Only when evidence came forward was Jeremy able to examine it. 

My theory and research is based only on what we knew before all these disclosures, which I refer to as smoke and mirrors.

It was a very simple plan and it fits in with everything that has been posted regarding the early days.

The evidence disclosed later has only muddied the waters, has caused confusion and exposed this cover up due to failings and dishonesty.

Your theory depends on too many 'what if's' AA bu at the heart of it, if Bamber's claim that Nevill was a Mason and there is no evidence that he was.

[Nicholas]

Your theory depends on too many 'what if's' AA bu at the heart of it, if Bamber's claim that Nevill was a Mason and there is no evidence that he was.

Bamber didn’t mention ‘masons’ to JM did he?

[APRIL]

It appears Bamber’s public innocence fraud campaign didn’t start until around the time he discarded AA ?

Judging by the way in which he managed to keep AA separate to 'protect' her, there could have been several others he was 'protecting' in the same way. How would any of them have ever known?

[Aunt Agatha]

It doesn't matter at all how far fetched my theory is... Its of no consequence to Jeremy and his CT.

We all have our views based upon our own knowledge.  My knowledge just happens to be different to all of yours.

I do not believe that either Jeremy or Sheila did the shootings... The whole family are innocent victims of a professional hit and the only surviving member is locked away for 35 yrs.... With no light at the end of the tunnel.

It's a f..kin disgrace.  Seriously. 

As for the CT.... wtf!!

[Aunt Agatha]

It appears Bamber’s public innocence fraud campaign didn’t start until around the time he discarded AA ?

He didn't disguard me!!

Again, another fine example of character assassination.

[Nicholas]

My theory and research is based only on what we knew before all these disclosures, which I refer to as smoke and mirrors.

It was a very simple plan and it fits in with everything that has been posted regarding the early days.

Sounds like Bamber’s 3rd party theory