The court of appeal do not posses the powers to determine factual innocence yet an inquiry led by Wyn Williams appears to have ignored this fact, and has bizarrely proceeded on the basis ex sub-postmasters, like Seema Misra, are actually, factually innocent - the evidence, when looked at in its entirety, shows otherwise
Paul Marshall, who ended up representing Seema Misra, and was almost had up on contempt of court charges, has recently made supplementary submissions, to the post office IT inquiry
Richard Moorhead from Exeter university, has recently blogged on this
👇
https://richardmoorhead.substack.com/p/compensation-questions-fraudRichard Moorhead and Rebecca Helm have also made submissions to the post office IT inquiry on behalf of Exeter uni’s ‘evidence based justice Lab’
In 2012 Rebecca Helm published an article with John Blume making the absurd claim the three child killers of 8 yr-olds Stevie Branch, Christopher Byers and Michael Moore were factually innocent
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2103787Richard Moorhead sounds very much like Michael Naughton
https://www.exeter.ac.uk/news/homepage/title_885427_en.htmlThe propaganda in relation to the ‘post office horizon scandal’ has seemingly duped many people not aware of the ‘innocence’ fraud phenomenon