I've just read the following on Blue:
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8231.msg395937.html#msg395937http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8231.msg395944.html#msg395944From the CoA document:
60. Found in or just outside the bedroom were thirteen cartridge cases. Seven would account for the shots into June Bamber, two for the wounds suffered by Sheila Caffell, leaving four cartridge cases that had been fired at Nevill Bamber. Three further cartridge cases were found in the kitchen, with a further case on the stairs leading up from the kitchen. If one accepts that the four shots to the head which would have immobilised and killed Nevill Bamber were fired in the kitchen where his body was recovered, it would follow that he had received the less serious injuries upstairs in the bedroom and was then able to make his way downstairs where he was subsequently killed.1. 13 casings were found inside the bedroom incl the 2 attributed to SC and a further casing on the landing = total of 14.
2. At trial Malcolm Fletcher said June might have sustained an 8th gsw which bruised her chest only and account for bullet DRH/5 found near the dressing table/window. Therefore the 8th casing found June's side of the bed might pertain to this.
3. There appears to be an assumption NB sustained his upstairs gsw's in the bedroom but what is this based on?
Thinking about other cases where crimes have been committed within a residential property the jury is usually taken to visit soc. Afaik the only individuals to visit soc were Dr Vanezis and the prosecutor, Anthony Arlidge QC.
Why didn't JB's defence arrange a pre-trial meeting at WHF with:
Dr Vanezis - pathologist -
Trajectories and wound tracksJohn Hayward - biologist - blood pattern analysis -
Interpretation of bloodstainingMalcolm Fletcher - ballistics -
Casinngs and distance of shotsWhy didn't the jury visit WHF?