Author Topic: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction  (Read 74800 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline puglove

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #210 on: May 11, 2017, 12:10:35 AM »
Ho ho!! That's the truth!!     %£&)**#


Anyhoo. Two things. The black and white image of June, that shows the blood smears on the door, is on blue. I remember discussing it, when the blue forum was interesting and informative. Before clappedout got thrown off a McCann forum for rudeness and made her ghastly nest on blue.

AND.....has Roch pissed or got off the pot yet? Or is he still teasing everyone? With something that doesn't exist?

Plus ca change.

 ?>)()<

Roch. I know that you look over here.

What is it that proves Sheila was responsible?
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline puglove

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #211 on: May 11, 2017, 12:21:29 AM »
Roch. I know that you look over here.

What is it that proves Sheila was responsible?

20 years down the line, it's all gone quiet on the western front, clappedout and troods are dead, Bamber is playing Happy Families with Mick Philpott, Mike Tesko's anklet is rubbing red-raw.

Karma!!
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline puglove

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #212 on: May 11, 2017, 12:33:08 AM »
20 years down the line, it's all gone quiet on the western front, clappedout and troods are dead, Bamber is playing Happy Families with Mick Philpott, Mike Tesko's anklet is rubbing red-raw.

Karma!!

It's all going well. There's a problem at the farm. Love you lots, Honey.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Myster

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #213 on: May 11, 2017, 05:41:02 AM »
It's all going well. There's a problem at the farm. Love you lots, Honey.
"Go back to bed, everything will be alright in the morning!"   ?{)(**
*thinks*... Like hell it will, a month of misery to suffer before I spill the beans.  8(8-))
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Myster

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #214 on: May 11, 2017, 05:44:43 AM »
Roch. I know that you look over here.

What is it that proves Sheila was responsible?

Wading through mad mike's verbal diarrhoea is enough to turn anyone's mind... to mush.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline APRIL

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #215 on: May 11, 2017, 08:42:17 AM »
Wading through mad mike's verbal diarrhoea is enough to turn anyone's mind... to mush.

A gold star -for effort- winging it's way to you 8)--))

Offline puglove

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #216 on: May 11, 2017, 10:23:46 AM »
Wading through mad mike's verbal diarrhoea is enough to turn anyone's mind... to mush.

Well, I blame Nelly. He's the one daft enough toupee for Mike's madness.

Just think how many hedgehogs that money would save.     ?8)@)-)
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #217 on: May 11, 2017, 01:18:03 PM »
Ho ho!! That's the truth!!     %£&)**#


Anyhoo. Two things. The black and white image of June, that shows the blood smears on the door, is on blue. I remember discussing it, when the blue forum was interesting and informative. Before clappedout got thrown off a McCann forum for rudeness and made her ghastly nest on blue.

AND.....has Roch pissed or got off the pot yet? Or is he still teasing everyone? With something that doesn't exist?

Plus ca change.

 ?>)()<

Yes, thanks for that puglove  8((()*/  I obviously didn't spend enough time ferreting around in the archives during my Blue days. 

What position was June in when she sustained the 2 gsw's to her head? 

Roch has gone all cryptic over his stance change from 50/50 to 100%. 

 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Myster

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #218 on: May 11, 2017, 07:36:08 PM »
Well, I blame Nelly. He's the one daft enough toupee for Mike's madness.

Just think how many hedgehogs that money would save.     ?8)@)-)

I saw what you did there!
« Last Edit: May 13, 2017, 04:48:34 PM by John »
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #219 on: May 13, 2017, 03:11:34 PM »
David have you thought any more about June's position when she sustained the two gsw's to her head?  There's no need for me to keep reposting the graphic image we are all familiar with.  I have lined up the rifle against the door, ie barrel over June and pointing out onto the landing, and then rotated it around based on the wound tracks and I can only get the casings on the landing?  I'm sorry but your casing ricochet just doesn't work as there's no evidence they have the sort of velocity required to travel the distance.  The 'Farm Girl' vid shows the sort of ricochet involved.  Although the casings are significantly larger they are heavier too with the inevitable drag so the net effect should be about the same.  They only require enough energy to eject them quickly enough to cycle a new round. 

Given June was incapable of voluntary movement after sustaining either gsw to the head I'm struggling with any involuntary movement and casings.  If she was sat up against the door when shot the the flight of the casings would be impeded by the door and they would ricochet back and land around her hand near her waist?  I can accept 1 could do somthing very random but not two.  Research shows for a variety of reasons 25% go astray so at least one should be where anticipated based on the ejection pattern.  This is borne out by the casings that pertain to SC unless she was moved significantly.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline adam

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #220 on: May 13, 2017, 03:17:56 PM »
Roch. I know that you look over here.

What is it that proves Sheila was responsible?

Roch says Ainsley was brought in to hide that evidence.

Offline Myster

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #221 on: May 13, 2017, 03:30:04 PM »
Roch says Ainsley was brought in to hide that evidence.

Wishful thinking and an absolute load of twaddle as usual.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #222 on: May 13, 2017, 04:13:23 PM »
Roch says Ainsley was brought in to hide that evidence.


As far as I can see the only thing that appears to have been 'hidden' was the bible.  Other than this I blame the lawyers for not appreciating the complexity of the case and seeking the right expertise. 

Forensic science was just coming into its own in the 80's and it seems there was a real mis-match between police training and also the quality of expert evidence. 

Anyway send my regards to Roch.  I did speak briefly with him once by phone and he does have quite a sexy Geordie accent.  I did associate Northern men with rough accents and grubby hands so it was nice to part dispel the myth!   
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Myster

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #223 on: May 13, 2017, 04:45:46 PM »
The words sexy and Geordie should never ever appear in the same sentence. They're always on about bowats cummin in and havin' fishies on a little dishies!
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline John

Re: Scene Of Crime Reconstruction
« Reply #224 on: May 13, 2017, 04:50:38 PM »
Roch says Ainsley was brought in to hide that evidence.

We shouldn't expect anything less from blue.  Tesko has them all brainwashed by now!
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.