What Happened To Madeleine McCann? - by Ian Horrocks.

[pathfinder73]

No evidence exists and Tannerman is found and ruled out. Gerry said slats were open which explains the light getting through.

[stephen25000]

You are entirely wrong that no evidence of abduction was found ... Jane Tanner was an eyewitness to the barefoot child in pyjamas being carried in the street immediately outside the apartment and away from the direction of the apartment.

A man taking a child home.

[jassi]

A man taking a child home.

One that OG seem to have no interest in.

[The Singularity]

Mr. Horrocks has no evidence.


He has his opinions, and the bias he has already shown in this case.

Any ex-police officer worth his NaCl, would know you can't eliminate possible suspects, when any crime has yet to be determined.

What you are disagreeing with is his opinion, however logically he is considered an authority on police work based on experience regardless of the mount of evidence?

[Mr Gray]

A man taking a child home.

That's what I said to sil last night after her elimination of smithman
Why would smithman try to avoid anyone
He was not suspicious at all
Back to the drawing board for sil
At least sil agrees abduction is the most likely svenario

[The Singularity]

It is fascinating to observe those who  support Horrocks

Also, he nailed his colours to the McCann supporting Sun, which tells us everything we need to know about Horrocks.

He has merely provided his jaundiced view of the case, even though he doesn't know what crime occurred.

Enough said.

You are dismissing an experienced law enforcement officer for what tangible reason? Because he wrote articles for the Sun?

I have to ask you with what credentials are you able to substantiate this claim and justify such dismissal of knowledge and experience?

If you are able to assure us all that you have in some way worked this case, or others similar, have a working experience of such crimes to the amount or similar as Mr Horrocks then perhaps your instant dismissal would have some grounding in logic and fact. However just saying he wrote for the Sun, no matter how appalling it is as a paper, it not an argument.

[stephen25000]

What you are disagreeing with is his opinion, however logically he is considered an authority on police work based on experience regardless of the mount of evidence?

What evidence are you referring to ?

[Mr Gray]

What evidence are you referring to ?

Stephen
Do you really have a scientific background

[Brietta]

No evidence exists and Tannerman is found and ruled out. Gerry said slats were open which explains the light getting through.

A British tourist who was taking a decidedly odd route with his child from the creche to his accommodation has almost certainly been traced.
The question is ... was that the man seen by Jane Tanner outside Block A?  Until there is a definitive answer to that one Jane Tanner's sighting is evidence now as it was when she reported it on the night of the little girl's disappearance ten years ago.

The lighting in the room would not have been described by the witness in the manner it was unless the shutter had been raised.

[stephen25000]

Thgere is no evidence worth a grain of salt to shopw abduction, compared to any other possibility.

No forensic evidence.

No sign whatsoever of anyone else in the apartment.

No trail in the paedophile network.

10 years of worldwide publicity and absolutely NOTHING.

[Brietta]

A man taking a child home.

Or a man kidnapping a child.

He was seen yards from an apartment from where it would be discovered soon after that a child had gone missing.

If Kate McCann returned home to discover the television was missing and Jane Tanner had seen a man carrying a television outside ... what could reasonably be deduced from that?

[stephen25000]

A British tourist who was taking a decidedly odd route with his child from the creche to his accommodation has almost certainly been traced.
The question is ... was that the man seen by Jane Tanner outside Block A?  Until there is a definitive answer to that one Jane Tanner's sighting is evidence now as it was when she reported it on the night of the little girl's disappearance ten years ago.

The lighting in the room would not have been described by the witness in the manner it was unless the shutter had been raised.

Have you been in the room and studied the lighting ?

How could Jane Tanner see clearly in what at best was twilight, and the only illumination, street lights ?

[The Singularity]

What evidence are you referring to ?

The amount of evidence he will have bagged and tagged, and then used his skills to detect the perpetrator of a crime. Someone serving in the police force for that length of time and in the areas highlighted in his career, would you think it was fair to say he has knowledge of evidence and used it to mount a case against a suspect?

[stephen25000]

Or a man kidnapping a child.

He was seen yards from an apartment from where it would be discovered soon after that a child had gone missing.

If Kate McCann returned home to discover the television was missing and Jane Tanner had seen a man carrying a television outside ... what could reasonably be deduced from that?

Straw clutching, and no more than that.

[stephen25000]

The amount of evidence he will have bagged and tagged, and then used his skills to detect the perpetrator of a crime. Someone serving in the police force for that length of time and in the areas highlighted in his career, would you think it was far to say he has knowledge of evidence and used it to mount a case against a suspect?

Can you remind me as to Horrocks experiences in missing children cases ?

Evidently,he hasn't interviewed the two people at the centre of the case, Gerry and Kate Mccann. That should have been one of the first things he should have done.