CMTV Gonçalo Amaral - O Enigma - with English subtitles

[G-Unit]

It's utter balderdash to claim that JT made a FORMAL identification of Murat.  If she had there would a FORMAL signed witness statement from her to that effect.    Her identification of Murat would have been the prime reason given in the Final report as to why he was made an arguido imo.   So why wasn't it?

Why doesn't Amaral explain in his book why he sent JT  home at a time when it would be absolutely vital that a witness statement from her claiming  Murat as 'definitely' being the man she saw would be required as a matter of urgency.     After all - this was without doubt the most important piece of evidence he had against Murat.

Where are the statements from the PJ officers with her - who could also confirm that she had made a positive identification - if she had?

Once again he omits key parts of what  happened in order to manipulate his readers into thinking what he wants them to think happened rather than what actually did happen.

I believe it's called 'lying by omission' in legal circles.  (from memory)

AIMHO


Must go out now....

Are the PJ allowed to arrange such covert identifications? Did the PJ arrange it? If they did why wasn't it documented in the files? In my opinion this had far more to do with the British than the Portuguese. I think Amaral could just have been repeating what he had been told.

[misty]

IMO Amaral has changed the direction of the Tannerman sighting because the man JT saw has been proven to exist by SY using Crecheman's own revelation. However, Amaral still implied that JT was mistaken in what she witnessed.
Is this another indication that Crecheman was really returning to Block 4 & that Amaral had prior knowledge of the information Crecheman provided?

[stephen25000]

IMO Amaral has changed the direction of the Tannerman sighting because the man JT saw has been proven to exist by SY using Crecheman's own revelation. However, Amaral still implied that JT was mistaken in what she witnessed.
Is this another indication that Crecheman was really returning to Block 4 & that Amaral had prior knowledge of the information Crecheman provided?

Or is it wishful thinking on your part ?

[misty]

Or is it wishful thinking on your part ?

No, Stephen, it's not. I have a lot more in my theory, all of which makes perfect sense.
Why do you think Amaral changed Tannerman's direction of travel in O Enigma?

[Robittybob1]

No, Stephen, it's not. I have a lot more in my theory, all of which makes perfect sense.
Why do you think Amaral changed Tannerman's direction of travel in O Enigma?

Tell us?

[misty]

Tell us?

Not all of it can be posted on site.
I would be interested to hear why others think Amaral has changed the direction of Tannerman's travel, given that SY never confirmed that particular aspect of Jane's sighting was incorrect/mistaken.

[jassi]

Not all of it can be posted on site.
I would be interested to hear why others think Amaral has changed the direction of Tannerman's travel, given that SY never confirmed that particular aspect of Jane's sighting was incorrect/mistaken.

Why is that?

[misty]

Why is that?

Some of it is libellous.

[jassi]

Some of it is libellous.

Surely if you can prove what you say, then it isn't libelous.

Out of curiosity, who would be libeled ?

[misty]

Surely if you can prove what you say, then it isn't libelous.

Out of curiosity, who would be libeled ?

So if I was to put #Innocent face beside a name it wouldn't be libellous?

[Robittybob1]

So if I was to put #Innocent face beside a name it wouldn't be libellous?

Said right you'll be OK.

[jassi]

Putting a name up isn't libel.

[misty]

Putting a name up isn't libel.

Not going there, Jassi. I have started a new topic, subject to approval, to develop my line of thought.

[Brietta]

Putting a name up isn't libel.

Please desist.  Misty has given an explanation of why she feels unable to expand on her theory; that should be sufficient for you.  You are verging on goading.

[G-Unit]

IMO Amaral has changed the direction of the Tannerman sighting because the man JT saw has been proven to exist by SY using Crecheman's own revelation. However, Amaral still implied that JT was mistaken in what she witnessed.
Is this another indication that Crecheman was really returning to Block 4 & that Amaral had prior knowledge of the information Crecheman provided?

Policemen hypothesise then their hypotheses change according to the evidence which emerges. I see no reason why Amaral's theories shouldn't change, so why do you?