Was Mark Rowley wrong to claim that Madeleine McCann was abducted?

[Erngath]

He is not a member of this forum so cannot post anything.  Take up your silly gripe with CMTV or YouTube.  We are not responsible for what anyone chooses to view.

But the video of his beliefs is on this forum and he does not use the words in my opinion.
So why are Rowley's words where he states that Madeleine was abducted subject to scrutiny and only in his opinion
all in my opinion of course,

[Robittybob1]

He said the only way she could have left the apartment was if she was abducted.  I disagree as she could have been lifted from the street.

Didn't he give that option?  Transcript required to solve this.  But it is back to bed for me ATM

[Erngath]

Isn't that where the Met have responsibility?

Ok .So you would prefer the Met to have spent the money in London on other projects.
I was thinking along the lines that the money was given by the UK government only for that specific  remit.

[Mr Gray]

He said the only way she could have left the apartment was if she was abducted.  I disagree as she could have been lifted from the street.

He should have all the information you dont

[Angelo222]

Didn't he give that option?  Transcript required to solve this.  But it is back to bed for me ATM

No, he said she wasn't old enough to set off on her own.

[Angelo222]

He should have all the information you dont

     and what a load of cobblers that amounts to.  avmimo

[Eleanor]

So we have Amaral stating opinion as fact, and Rowley stating opinion as fact.

I think all future references to both of them should be Deleted.

[stephen25000]

I have not posted abduction as fact
I have posted the Rowley has posted it as fact

It isn't a fact.

Just an opinion.

[Angelo222]

So we have Amaral stating opinion as fact, and Rowley stating opinion as fact.

I think all future references to both of them should be Deleted.

I agree, they're as bad as each other.

[stephen25000]

But the video of his beliefs is on this forum and he does not use the words in my opinion.
So why are Rowley's words where he states that Madeleine was abducted subject to scrutiny and only in his opinion
all in my opinion of course,

No one has forced you to watch the video.

His theories are already known.

[misty]

Being allowed to post that there is no evidence of abduction appears to be permitted yet that is also an unproven fact. Very biased.

As none of us actually know what evidence there is or isn't & discussion about abduction must now be accompanied by a million disclaimers, or the red pen will be produced, what the heck is the point of a discussion forum????

[barrier]

There is specific information he has that you dont

Does Rowley actually hold any info into a specific investigation, I'd have thought his brief wouldn't allow it,imo his press interview was cobbled together by his press officer.

[Robittybob1]

No, he said she wasn't old enough to set off on her own.

How old do you have to be?

[Eleanor]

I agree, they're as bad as each other.

I might just do that.  That'll be the end of this particular argument.

[stephen25000]

Now, here's a thought.

What would Mccann's supporters say if Rowley stated he believed in the accidental death scenario ?

Now would they say it is a fact ?