Are you able to show that Europol and Interpol have been involved? MLA requires the involvement of neither one.
On the face of it your gross assumption is no better than my less gross assumption unless ya'll are a conspiracy theorist. Deal me out of that one.
Dear Alice it is not so easy for one country police to pick up a phone and call another country police and request cooperation, maybe they can to play soccer or have a coke but not for legal matters. This is the main reason why Interpol and Europol have been made. They are not here either to make direct cooperation for police but to carry out judicial duties of booth countries and not directly but through Ministry of Justice or Department of Justice depending on the setup of the institution in one country.
The only case when those two institutions are bypassed is when two counties Ministry of Justice send letters to request setting grounds for cooperation such the case in with UK and Portugal .
Spoiler; Try to find out what a police statement in Paraguay was few years back when there was roomer that Maddie might be located in South America and will be easy to understand.
There is international machine activated against “someone” they have capability to dig them out as rain worms including there own eggs. I will bet it is network they are against not individuals.
You assume there was a crime.
You assume there was an abduction.
Assumptions are no more than speculation.
You assume there was a crime.
1.I dont assume a crime Portugal Judicial authorities does. There is child missing from 5a and there is criminal proceeding open in Portugal with all elements .They don’t open criminal proceeding for a child which walk away but they do open for a Crime committed after review of evidance, you cant open one without evidance.
Before you apply Criminal code you have to apply Criminal Procedure law. Until judicial police and the leading prosecutor office (sometimes investigative judge) close it is as such.
2. You assume Abduction
-I think the above answer is valid.
3. Assumption is no more than speculation.
I agree that’s why I elaborated above. I hope you will review you signature regarding the McCain’s and two persons making money on a missing and listen to your advice once a again.
I agree with you that someone is making money but the investigation is here to show who. Who is continuing to provide logistic on the actors involved on what happened May 3 2007. Logistic is also punishable as obstruction of justice at least there are many more grounds they can be charged also.
This is a school case for needed international law enforcement cooperation to crack down on issue.