I know it as I am sure you do too ... if you pretend to know anything at all about Madeleine McCann's case.
If a cite is truly required to substantiate a statement or phrase in a conversation, fair enough. However there are some things which are "common knowledge" which can surely be sensibly allowed to enable the discussion to flow.
For example if I say in a sentence: " ... perhaps the man Jane saw carrying a child ..." do I really need to add http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/JANE-TANNER-10MAY.htm
If so that's fine by me ... but it is certainly going to have to be implemented across the board by members ... and monitored or controlled (whichever takes your fancy) consistently and with fairness ... by forum monitors.
I have two problems with this 'fact' as accepted by McCann supporters. Firstly, there is no independent evidence that the McCanns were advised to show no emotion. Secondly, most relatives of missing people would find such advice impossible to follow in my opinion.
I would soon be advised by British police experts to try to stay as calm as possible and not to show any emotion in public
Madeleine
'Behavioural experts advised me not to show emotion in case the abductor got a kick from it,'
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2008/may/04/madeleinemccann.ukcrimeAh yes, the 'Cracker' team Dr Joe Sullivan and Detective Chief Superintendent Graham Hill. He gives other reasons for the McCann's lack of emotion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1gOOkyaPAUDespite being there within days, he seems to have a lack of knowledge of the basics of the case. He says they went on holiday with 16 friends, he says they left the apartment locked....I do agree when he says that statistically it's unlikely that Madeleine is alive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JMlJqx1-4s&app=desktopIf the police gave similar advice to others it had no effect whatsoever;
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=april+jones+appealhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJcnM4S3OzQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YITVWIfsI08