Author Topic: Is the British government protecting the McCanns and if so for what reason.  (Read 15917 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

But there must be one?

Anything would be mere speculation.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline slartibartfast

The answer to your original question is no, the government is not protecting the McCanns. Whether individuals in positions of authority take default positions based on incomplete information is another question unanswerable by those not involved.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline faithlilly

The answer to your original question is no, the government is not protecting the McCanns. Whether individuals in positions of authority take default positions based on incomplete information is another question unanswerable by those not involved.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

Agreed.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Erngath

The answer to your original question is no, the government is not protecting the McCanns. Whether individuals in positions of authority take default positions based on incomplete information is another question unanswerable by those not involved.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor


By that do you mean that these individuals in position of authority are being deprived of information or are content to base their opinion on  information which is out of date?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Mr Gray

Imo the all the evidence against the mCcanns has been looked at and it is blindingly obvious they are not involved. Anyone suggesting there are other reasons why the mccanns are not suspects would need to explain why the portuguese have not re investigated the mccanns. So far no one hs been able to do this
« Last Edit: August 15, 2017, 07:00:00 AM by davel »

Offline Mr Gray

The answer to your original question is no, the government is not protecting the McCanns. Whether individuals in positions of authority take default positions based on incomplete information is another question unanswerable by those not involved.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

You are suggesting that those making decisions have incomplete knowledge when the truth is that they are most likely to have more knowledge of the facts than the armchair detectives on the internet who are criticising them
Your argument doesn't even reach the first hurdle....imo of course

stephen25000

  • Guest
Imo the all the evidence against the mCcanns has been looked at and it is blindingly obvious they are not involved. Anyone suggesting there are other reasons why the mccanns are not suspects would need to explain why the portuguese have not re investigated the mccanns. So far no one hs been able to do this

What happened is undetermined.

Only the 'blind' can't see or admit that.

Offline Erngath

What happened is undetermined.

Only the 'blind' can't see or admit that.


Can you give  any reason as to why the government might be protecting the McCanns, or do you not believe they are being protected?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

stephen25000

  • Guest

Can you give  any reason as to why the government might be protecting the McCanns, or do you not believe they are being protected?

Haven't you been reading through the posts on this topic ?

Offline Mr Gray

What happened is undetermined.

Only the 'blind' can't see or admit that.

Then tell me why neither SY nor the vPJ are investigating the McCanns
Only the blind cannot see that they have been ruled out

Offline Erngath

Haven't you been reading through the posts on this topic ?

Do try a different tactic Stephen.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Then tell me why neither SY nor the vPJ are investigating the McCanns
Only the blind cannot see that they have been ruled out

I am not blind metaphorically or otherwise.

REMEMBER, no other person than the ones known have been found in the apartment that night.

Then tell me this, and try answering it for once, what would happen to the the McCann's if it was shown there was no abduction ?


Offline Erngath

I am not blind metaphorically or otherwise.

REMEMBER, no other person than the ones known have been found in the apartment that night.

Then tell me this, and try answering it for once, what would happen to the the McCann's if it was shown there was no abduction ?

Once again, you do not answer a question but deflect by asking one of your own.
Why are the McCanns not being investigated by the British and Portuguese police?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Once again, you do not answer a question but deflect by asking one of your own.
Why are the McCanns not being investigated by the British and Portuguese police?

They were evidently told not to.

You know that as well as I do.


So Erngath, what evidence is there of an unknown  person in the apartment that night ?

Offline Erngath

They were evidently told not to.

You know that as well as I do.


So Erngath, what evidence is there of an unknown  person in the apartment that night ?

I don't know what evidence there is.
The initial collection of evidence was deeply flawed.
Evidence could have been destroyed,  missed opportunities of evidence being taken, the examination of the finger prints on the window was amateurish etc etc.
Now I didn't know that they were told not to investigate the McCanns.
Do you mean the Portuguese have also been told the McCanns are off limits?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.