Author Topic: Timeline.  (Read 2359 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

david1819

  • Guest
Timeline.
« on: August 21, 2017, 02:23:47 PM »
Thought i would share this with you guys.

I've attempted to put together a detailed timeline of the phone calls regarding JB, JM and the Police in the lead up to arriving at the farm. It contains alternate scenario's of Jeremy either ringing the police first or Julie first.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Timeline.
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2017, 02:55:52 PM »
Thought i would share this with you guys.

I've attempted to put together a detailed timeline of the phone calls regarding JB, JM and the Police in the lead up to arriving at the farm. It contains alternate scenario's of Jeremy either ringing the police first or Julie first.

Hello boyo. 

Blimey this will more than whet Reader's appetite. 

Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Timeline.
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2017, 05:27:01 PM »
David in the absence of 1 reliable data point in terms of a timing I don't see how anyone can put together a reliable timeline?  Even if I'm mistaken I don't see how a reliable timeline can prove or disprove the claimed call from NB to JB or even make it more or less likely? 

Are you writing a book or something and feel the need to include a timeline? 

What are you trying to achieve by this timeline? 

Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

david1819

  • Guest
Re: Timeline.
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2017, 08:07:07 PM »
David in the absence of 1 reliable data point in terms of a timing I don't see how anyone can put together a reliable timeline?  Even if I'm mistaken I don't see how a reliable timeline can prove or disprove the claimed call from NB to JB or even make it more or less likely? 

Are you writing a book or something and feel the need to include a timeline? 

What are you trying to achieve by this timeline?

My main motive behind this is to end the stupid notion that Nevill called the police.

Offline adam

Re: Timeline.
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2017, 08:17:52 AM »
Reasons why Nevill did not call Chelmsford police:

It would mean the police framed a man they knew was innocent. Why ?


It was the 5th furthest away police station.

Withham station was nearer. They answered the phone when a police operative rang them.  So would have answered Nevill's call if he had rang. 

Nevill would have to find Chelmsford police stations phone number in a phone book.

Nevill had already phoned Bamber half an hour earlier.

Nevill had half an hour after phoning Bamber, to calm Sheila down.

Nevill had half an hour after phoning Bamber to use force to get the rifle off her.

Nevill liked to keep things private according to Bamber. 

Nevill would have to spend at least 5 minutes speaking to the police on the phone.  He had only been able to speak to Bamber for 2 - 4 seconds 30 minutes earlier. Due to Sheila's behaviour.

Nevill could call the Foakes who were yards away.

Nevill could call other relatives who were nearby.

The front door was not left ajar for anyone arriving without a key.

The police did not tell Bamber on the night Nevill had called them.

The police did not tell Bamber Nevill had called the police in the month prior to his arrest.

Nevill's call to Chelmsford police was not part of the 2012 CCRC application.

Nevill phoning the police at 3.26am/3.36am, only gave Sheila 22/12 minutes to commit the massacre & do everything else it is claimed she did, prior to the police arriving. All these things would take Sheila over one hour.

Nevill would have dialled 999.

The police have always denied receiving a call from Nevill.

The relatives would not have pursued the case if Taff Jones had told them Nevill had called the police.

The police would have told the media that Nevill called the police. They told the media Nevill called Bamber.

It has only been claimed Nevill called the poiice since 2010. This is due to properganda purposes.

Bamber also called Chelmsford police station. Two people in 30 minutes calling the 5th furthest police station is a 1 in a million possibility.

Nevill had half an hour to wake June for assistance between his two phone calls. He did not.

Several supporters don't believe Nevill called the police.

If Nevill called the police before Bamber did, the police would not have bothered taking the details from Bamber. It was wasting time & they already had the details.

Nevill may have believed Bamber would phone the police for him. This is what Bamber did. 

No one has explained what happened at WHF between 3.10am - 3.26am/3.36am. Only Roch has said 'a further escalation of events'.

All supporters who have given a Sheila scenario do not include Nevill phoning the police.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2017, 08:25:36 AM by adam »

Offline adam

Re: Timeline.
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2017, 08:31:38 AM »
The media were told by the police that Nevill phoned Bamber. An ITV news reporter straight after the massacre says on television 'Nevill Bamber phoned his son'.

Surely the police would have told the media that Nevill had phoned them as well.

There is no justification in the police not telling the media, relatives & Bamber. For a month. Espescially as Taff Jones was heading the investigation during this period.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2017, 08:43:54 AM by adam »

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Timeline.
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2017, 09:00:24 AM »
My main motive behind this is to end the stupid notion that Nevill called the police.

You will never convince those that believe NB called EP otherwise.  Even after JB's conviction has been quashed and the Gov orders a judge led inquiry and he/she examines every single doc and interviews every living relevant witness and finds not a scrap of evidence for such a phone call you will still have some insisting NB called EP and a cover up.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline adam

Re: Timeline.
« Reply #7 on: August 22, 2017, 09:12:22 AM »
Or maybe the police did tell the media, relatives & Bamber thar Nevill had phoned them. But -

The media didn't report such.

The relatives still tried to frame Bamber.

Bamber thought it was not worth mentioning for 25 years.


Bamber has never said the police told him Nevill had phoned them. His claim is made on the basis of documents. No one from the media has come forward either. So this is not really a possibility.

Offline adam

Re: Timeline.
« Reply #8 on: August 22, 2017, 10:55:21 AM »
You will never convince those that believe NB called EP otherwise.  Even after JB's conviction has been quashed and the Gov orders a judge led inquiry and he/she examines every single doc and interviews every living relevant witness and finds not a scrap of evidence for such a phone call you will still have some insisting NB called EP and a cover up.

I believe it is now only Mike, Roch & Reader saying Nevill called Chelmsford police.

The OS & Bamber made the claim that Nevill called the police to the media, in 2010. They can't make a public retraction as it will undermine them too much. So it will always be part of the official 'campaign for freedom'.

Offline adam

Re: Timeline.
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2017, 07:24:27 PM »
It seems everyone is in agreement that Nevill didn't call Chelmsford police.

David has previously given scenarios where Nevill calls the police. As well as said the police did not tell Bamber about Nevill's police call when they met him,  so they could frame Bamber at a later date.

He has wisely had a re think.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2017, 07:31:29 PM by adam »