Author Topic: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights  (Read 44012 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline misty

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2715 on: January 09, 2019, 08:54:53 PM »
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22languageisocode%22:[%22ENG%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22JUDGMENTS%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-188987%22]}

Prunea v Romania 47881/11

The result of a case, in which the ECHR have ruled in favour of a defamed public person, announced this week.

Offline Davel

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2716 on: January 09, 2019, 09:02:27 PM »
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22languageisocode%22:[%22ENG%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22JUDGMENTS%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-188987%22]}

Prunea v Romania 47881/11

The result of a case, in which the ECHR have ruled in favour of a defamed public person, announced this week.
Having looked at many cases in my view, the, SC got it totally wrong..... A public person has just as much protection Re defamation as, anyone else.... However... A judge or politician... In their public duties... Can expect reasonable criticism
UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED ALL POSTS ARE MY OPINION

Offline jassi

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2717 on: January 09, 2019, 09:07:22 PM »
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22languageisocode%22:[%22ENG%22],%22documentcollectionid2%22:[%22JUDGMENTS%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-188987%22]}

Prunea v Romania 47881/11

The result of a case, in which the ECHR have ruled in favour of a defamed public person, announced this week.

Are you sure that's right?

The guy ,Prunea, wrote a piece in a paper about a politician, MI, who took him to court and won all the way.
ECHR ruled that Prunea was entitled to his view.

« Last Edit: January 09, 2019, 09:12:15 PM by jassi »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -   11 years and still no solution.

Offline Davel

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2718 on: January 09, 2019, 09:09:51 PM »
 suing the network, the production company Critical Content, and several consultants for $750 million over a true-crime special asserting he caused his younger sister’s infamous death, JonBenét Ramsey’s brother Burke Ramsey has reportedly settled with CBS for an undisclosed amount of money. “I can only comment that the case has been amicably resolved to the satisfaction of all parties,” Ramsey’s lawyer Lin Wood said in a statement Friday. “It is now my professional and personal wish for this family that they no longer suffer the pain of false accusations in the future.” The settlement was also confirmed by a network spokesperson.



I'm surprised ni one has, raised this point
UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED ALL POSTS ARE MY OPINION

Offline misty

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2719 on: January 09, 2019, 09:16:34 PM »
Are you sure that's right?

The guy ,Prunea, wrote a piece in a paper about a politician, MI, who took him to court and won all the way.
ECHR ruled that Prunea was entitled to his view.

ECHR ruled Romanian courts had not violated article 10 & Prunea had to pay damages.

Offline misty

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2720 on: January 09, 2019, 09:18:11 PM »
suing the network, the production company Critical Content, and several consultants for $750 million over a true-crime special asserting he caused his younger sister’s infamous death, JonBenét Ramsey’s brother Burke Ramsey has reportedly settled with CBS for an undisclosed amount of money. “I can only comment that the case has been amicably resolved to the satisfaction of all parties,” Ramsey’s lawyer Lin Wood said in a statement Friday. “It is now my professional and personal wish for this family that they no longer suffer the pain of false accusations in the future.” The settlement was also confirmed by a network spokesperson.



I'm surprised ni one has, raised this point

That's probably because it doesn't involve ECHR laws IMO.

Offline jassi

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2721 on: January 09, 2019, 09:19:03 PM »
ECHR ruled Romanian courts had not violated article 10 & Prunea had to pay damages.

Prunea was the applicant to the ECHR court. Why should he pay damages?

In fact Prunea paid 5000 euro to the Romanian Court. This was deemed reasonable by the ECHR
« Last Edit: January 09, 2019, 09:29:11 PM by jassi »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -   11 years and still no solution.

Offline Davel

Re: McCanns appeal to the European Court of Human Rights
« Reply #2722 on: January 09, 2019, 09:32:33 PM »
Prunea was the applicant to the ECHR court. Why should he pay damages?

In fact Prunea paid 5000 euro to the Romanian Court. This was deemed reasonable by the ECHR

So the ECHR ruled that the journalist had no right to defame a public figure.. That sems to be the point
UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED ALL POSTS ARE MY OPINION