General discussion about the latest news (not search related)

[G-Unit]

The eagerness of sceptics to have Madeleine McCann's case investigated is not palpable in my opinion ... more imperceptible or even non existent. But to me it is also very revealing.

As Coxon quite correctly pointed out, Operation Grange was never fit for purpose. Who knows; a full and free investigation might just have found something.

[The General]

The eagerness of sceptics to have Madeleine McCann's case investigated is not palpable in my opinion ... more imperceptible or even non existent. But to me it is also very revealing.

Bizarre sentence construction aside, why is it 'very revealing'?

[barrier]

The eagerness of sceptics to have Madeleine McCann's case investigated is not palpable in my opinion ... more imperceptible or even non existent. But to me it is also very revealing.

I'm sceptical a true version of events will ever be known,save from a confession.

[Vertigo Swirl]

As Coxon quite correctly pointed out, Operation Grange was never fit for purpose. Who knows; a full and free investigation might just have found something.

Any chance of an IMO here?  No, didn’t think so...

[Robittybob1]

Any chance of an IMO here?  No, didn’t think so...

"Who knows; a full and free investigation might just have found something." is obviously an opinion.

[Eleanor]

As Coxon quite correctly pointed out, Operation Grange was never fit for purpose. Who knows; a full and free investigation might just have found something.

In Your Opinion.

[Angelo222]

As Coxon quite correctly pointed out, Operation Grange was never fit for purpose. Who knows; a full and free investigation might just have found something.

It begs the question as to why SY deemed it necessary to limit the enquiry, that in itself requires a public inquiry imo given the £millions that have been wasted chasing dead ends.

[Vertigo Swirl]

"Who knows; a full and free investigation might just have found something." is obviously an opinion.

Was that the bit I highlighted Rob?

[Robittybob1]

Was that the bit I highlighted Rob?

Sorry Didn't notice the highlight.  "As Coxon quite correctly pointed out, Operation Grange was never fit for purpose."  To me this is more like a cite.  I'm not checking whether all cites are correct.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Sorry Didn't notice the highlight.  "As Coxon quite correctly pointed out, Operation Grange was never fit for purpose."  To me this is more like a cite.  I'm not checking whether all cites are correct.

I give up. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

As Andy Redwood quite rightly pointed out, neither the McCanns nor their friends are suspects in their daughter’s disappearance (which has all the hallmarks of a stranger abduction). 

[Wonderfulspam]

As Andy Redwood quite rightly pointed out, neither the McCanns nor their friends are suspects in their daughter’s disappearance (which has all the hallmarks of a stranger abduction).

But that doesn't mean they didn't do it.

[G-Unit]

As Andy Redwood quite rightly pointed out, neither the McCanns nor their friends are suspects in their daughter’s disappearance (which has all the hallmarks of a stranger abduction).

Operation Gramge have been very clear about that, but have failed to explain why.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Operation Gramge have been very clear about that, but have failed to explain why.

Yes they have, you just don’t accept their explanation .

[ShiningInLuz]

Yes they have, you just don’t accept their explanation .

Which is what?