Author Topic: Blogger Nigel Nessling avoids prison after downloading 40,000 indecent images.  (Read 92791 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

I can describe quite a few of anti's in the same manner.

People that anyone with any sense keeps away from. .
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline jassi

I can describe quite a few of anti's in the same manner.


Two wrongs don't make it right.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline G-Unit

His blog just showed him arguing with anti's nothing else.  You are aware there are anti's who used the same sort of language are you?

Arguing? Calling them unintelligent, irrational and insane is arguing, is it? I call it abusing, not arguing.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

G Unit can you explain why exactly you started this thread?

I have already done that more than once.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline slartibartfast

Actually ... no, it does not, and your prejudicial comment indicates why it may be problematic in getting control of the present situation.

My research into the individual under discussion here, raised an interesting point.  How do we originally know his name ... how do we know his posting identity to enable the connection to be made?

He was hacked many years ago by individuals who made it their business to 'out' him.  I will cite that later when I have time to find it again.

He pleaded guilty when caught.
He did not make the rather obvious defence that his computer had been hacked, did he?

Members of the public searching for child porn on the internet for the purpose of shutting down sites is asking for trouble IMO.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline slartibartfast

Snip

Those accusations are clear and unambiguous. Those who question the McCann's version of events are unintelligent, irrational or insane. That's the same tactic taken to a higher level. None of it can be proved, obviously, but the hope is that it might stop some people from reading and believing what these 'anti's' say.

Snip

It is an all too typical approach.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Erngath

I have already done that more than once.

Can you explain again please and do you feel that the thread has been worthwhile?
Has it achieved what you intended?
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Brietta

Members of the public searching for child porn on the internet for the purpose of shutting down sites is asking for trouble IMO.

No more so than in my opinion, members of the public setting themselves up as judge and jury in the case of a missing child.

At least there is a positive outcome from this organisation of the removal of 57,000 web pages of child abuse material in a one year blitz, children rescued and arrest and imprisonment of offenders.

Brilliant work but if that's all there is to protect children ... it is very patently not nearly enough.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Posted by whom, when, where? Examples would help rather than opinions.
I told you before and you replied you didn't see it

Offline Mr Gray

I wonder who the biggest culprit is?

I would say obscene language...racial stereotyping takes some beating

Offline G-Unit

Can you explain again please and do you feel that the thread has been worthwhile?
Has it achieved what you intended?

Post 3 page 1
I started the thread because I want to explore how easy it is for people like Nessling to deceive others. He presented himself as someone who cared deeply about missing children but at the same time his actions meant he was condoning/encouraging child sex abuse.

The thread has been very enlightening and I have learned a great deal. I hoped that the thread might lead people to reflect on the manner in which the case is discussed and perhaps decide to disassociate themselves from people like Nessling. 

In my opinion that hasn't happened. Nessing and his posting style have been defended and excused. No-one seems to have considered that his style and tactics might simply appeal to others with a desire to join in and be nasty, regardless of the cause.

In my opinion the means are just as important as the ends.


Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Erngath

Post 3 page 1
I started the thread because I want to explore how easy it is for people like Nessling to deceive others. He presented himself as someone who cared deeply about missing children but at the same time his actions meant he was condoning/encouraging child sex abuse.

The thread has been very enlightening and I have learned a great deal. I hoped that the thread might lead people to reflect on the manner in which the case is discussed and perhaps decide to disassociate themselves from people like Nessling. 

In my opinion that hasn't happened. Nessing and his posting style have been defended and excused. No-one seems to have considered that his style and tactics might simply appeal to others with a desire to join in and be nasty, regardless of the cause.

In my opinion the means are just as important as the ends.



I assume you realise he has deceived his family who were much closer to him than anyone.
If he could deceive them, then anyone else is easily deceived.
No doubt his family believed he cared deeply about missing children.

I will only say that having a polite, respectful, non aggressive, posting style does not ensure that the poster is not hiding some nasty beliefs.

One of them most homophobic, racist and biggoted posters involved in this case couches his nasty beliefs in very polite, non aggressive manner.

I hope eventually the thread does achieve what you are hoping for.

« Last Edit: December 07, 2017, 04:58:53 PM by slartibartfast »
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline G-Unit

I told you before and you replied you didn't see it

When? Where? Tell me more.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Alice Purjorick

No more so than in my opinion, members of the public setting themselves up as judge and jury in the case of a missing child.

At least there is a positive outcome from this organisation of the removal of 57,000 web pages of child abuse material in a one year blitz, children rescued and arrest and imprisonment of offenders.

Brilliant work but if that's all there is to protect children ... it is very patently not nearly enough.

They are both wrong.
In my book however equivocation is worse.
So just for the record what is your true belief and spare us the swallowed dictionary routine.
"Navigating the difference between weird but normal grief and truly suspicious behaviour is the key for any detective worth his salt.". ….Sarah Bailey

Offline Erngath

For you part that is called being wise after the event.
I had to put up with one of your cohorts calling me a paedophile and terrorist supporter among other things.
I never noticed you or other supporters complaining about it, rather giving each other high fives.
If you don't like the heat get out the bleedin' kitchen.....simples.

Well you've got your own back.
Haven't you?
Can I have a cite for me doing that which you accuse me of.
I, for one do not appreciate being called a disciple of a man who  has a conviction for gathering child pornography.

Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.