Blogger Nigel Nessling avoids prison after downloading 40,000 indecent images.

[slartibartfast]

Allows the defence of “I’m a member of the Internet Watch Foundation”.

[stephen25000]

Now back to Nessling and on topic.

Erngath. Do you not realize people's perceptions of him were made before we knew about the court case, and the accusations he made at other people are appalling ?

[Brietta]

Allows the defence of “I’m a member of the Internet Watch Foundation”.

Actually ... no, it does not, and your prejudicial comment indicates why it may be problematic in getting control of the present situation.

My research into the individual under discussion here, raised an interesting point.  How do we originally know his name ... how do we know his posting identity to enable the connection to be made?

He was hacked many years ago by individuals who made it their business to 'out' him.  I will cite that later when I have time to find it again.

He pleaded guilty when caught.
He did not make the rather obvious defence that his computer had been hacked, did he?

[stephen25000]

Actually ... no, it does not, and your prejudicial comment indicates why it may be problematic in getting control of the present situation.

My research into the individual under discussion here, raised an interesting point.  How do we originally know his name ... how do we know his posting identity to enable the connection to be made?

He was hacked many years ago by individuals who made it their business to 'out' him.  I will cite that later when I have time to find it again.

He pleaded guilty when caught.
He did not make the rather obvious defence that his computer had been hacked, did he?

If you are referring to Nessling.

His blogs.



Some are still up, as are his opinions and book reviews, e.g. on Amazon.

[Erngath]

Now back to Nessling and on topic.

Erngath. Do you not realize people's perceptions of him were made before we knew about the court case, and the accusations he made at other people are appalling?

Just as appalling as the appalling accusations made against the MCanns.
The nature of some of these accusations must be indicative of their type of personalities.

[Brietta]

If you are referring to Nessling.

His blogs.



Some are still up, as are his opinions and book reviews, e.g. on Amazon.

The advantage you have over me in relation to this man ... is that you appear to know quite a lot about him ... and I do not.

However all of that is an irrelevance as to why his name is in the heading of this thread. 
He is now a convicted criminal but he is one who had no input whatsoever into the events of May 2007.

So I am at a loss as to your fixation on him and his blogs since they play absolutely no part whatsoever in the case brought against him ... therefore , in fact, a total irrelevance.

[stephen25000]

The advantage you have over me in relation to this man ... is that you appear to know quite a lot about him ... and I do not.

However all of that is an irrelevance as to why his name is in the heading of this thread. 
He is now a convicted criminal but he is one who had no input whatsoever into the events of May 2007.

So I am at a loss as to your fixation on him and his blogs since they play absolutely no part whatsoever in the case brought against him ... therefore , in fact, a total irrelevance.

The content of your post was entirely predictable.

As to his posts and blogs, quite a lot of people have been on the receiving end of his bile, including me, easily found on the net, e.g. book reviews on Amazon. They show his nature. That you intent to divert from that is also predictable.

As to fixations, as you call them, they are quite evident in you. I.M.H.O. of course.

[Erngath]

The content of your post was entirely predictable.

As to his posts and blogs, quite a lot of people have been on the receiving end of his bile, including me, easily found on the net, e.g. book reviews on Amazon. They show his nature. That you intent to divert from that is also predictable.

As to fixations, as you call them, they are quite evident in you. I.M.H.O. of course.

No one has been at the receiving end of as much appalling bile as the family of a missing child.

[stephen25000]

No one has been at the receiving end of as much appalling bile as the family of a missing child.

I presume you can prove that statement ?

[Erngath]

I presume you can prove that statement ?

Why don't you ask Alice to prove his statements,?

[kizzy]

Very difficult to ignore repeated accusations of being not concerned with child abuse.
I guess it was a tactic to persuade me to engage again  with his thread The  offensive post was rightly removed yesterday and now the same accusations again.
Will try to ignore but it is difficult.

It would appear the offensive post has been removed.
Thank you to whoever removed it.

Where have i accused you of not being concerned with child abuse.


Nigel Nessling is a sex offender involving children, i can't see how that can be defended.

It's wrong also that several posters are accusing G-Unit ,starting this forum for ulterior motives.

G-Unit IMO is a credit to this forum, and never as i can see uses underhanded tactics,

.

[stephen25000]

Why don't you ask Alice to prove his statements,?

I would thought you would have realized by now, what I have already seen online and the support he received, before his criminal conviction, has supplied the relevant info, and Alice was effectively saying the same.

I.M.O. of course.

[Alice Purjorick]

Actually ... no, it does not, and your prejudicial comment indicates why it may be problematic in getting control of the present situation.

My research into the individual under discussion here, raised an interesting point.  How do we originally know his name ... how do we know his posting identity to enable the connection to be made?

He was hacked many years ago by individuals who made it their business to 'out' him.  I will cite that later when I have time to find it again.

He pleaded guilty when caught.
He did not make the rather obvious defence that his computer had been hacked, did he?

That defence only works if it is true and I believe applies to the computer on which the images were found.
The police IT guys would soon discover if the defence were true.

[G-Unit]

Where have i accused you of not being concerned with child abuse.


Nigel Nessling is a sex offender involving children, i can't see how that can be defended.

It's wrong also that several posters are accusing G-Unit ,starting this forum for ulterior motives.

G-Unit IMO is a credit to this forum, and never as i can see uses underhanded tactics,

.

Thank you Kizzy. Accusing others of having ulterior motives is just a mud-slinging tactic. The aim is to counter what the person is saying by suggesting they're being duplicitous. It's used regularly on Forums and blogs to try to silence others or cast doubt on their integrity. Take this statement from the subject of this thread;

the average anti does not fit that demographic, i.e. intelligent, rational or sane.
https://nigelnessling.wordpress.com/read-the-files/

Those accusations are clear and unambiguous. Those who question the McCann's version of events are unintelligent, irrational or insane. That's the same tactic taken to a higher level. None of it can be proved, obviously, but the hope is that it might stop some people from reading and believing what these 'anti's' say.

I'm glad you were able to see that the accusation was false because I really don't try to mislead, I say what I mean and I mean what I say.

[kizzy]

Thank you Kizzy. Accusing others of having ulterior motives is just a mud-slinging tactic. The aim is to counter what the person is saying by suggesting they're being duplicitous. It's used regularly on Forums and blogs to try to silence others or cast doubt on their integrity. Take this statement from the subject of this thread;

the average anti does not fit that demographic, i.e. intelligent, rational or sane.
https://nigelnessling.wordpress.com/read-the-files/

Those accusations are clear and unambiguous. Those who question the McCann's version of events are unintelligent, irrational or insane. That's the same tactic taken to a higher level. None of it can be proved, obviously, but the hope is that it might stop some people from reading and believing what these 'anti's' say.

I'm glad you were able to see that the accusation was false because I really don't try to mislead, I say what I mean and I mean what I say.

Exactly, well said