Possibly but that is not the issue.
This is the issue:
"What evidence is there that the initial investigation was not fit for purpose"
The correct answer remains "none"
What evidence would you expect, Alice?
I'd find the question easier the other way around.
- Was there a missing child protocol in place?
- Who was adequately trained on the team for a potential child abduction / murder?
- Did the PJ have a sex offender list?
- Did the PJ have a DNA database?
- Did the PJ forensic team do a thorough investigation?
- Should any of the officers have been reassigned due to pending investigations into the only other missing child case they'd been involved in?
- Did they initially have adequate facilities / resources? If so, what were they?
- In view of the nature of the case, was the language barrier an obstacle?
- What experience had they had in requesting overseas assistance beyond possibly a drug trafficking case?
- ...