Where were Jez and Gerry standing when they did their talking? Ideas solutions

[jassi]

Does anyone save entire videos?

You'd need a pretty hefty stick for a video of any length

[G-Unit]

I have searched using various combinations of the words Cutting Edge, Madeleine, Reconstruction, Channel 4 etc but was unable to find anything.  If you can that would be great.

I actually posted both videos, on here a few months ago and mentioned various things about them.  Haven't the energy to check, but my guess is that they will have been whooshed

Put 'Madeleine was here' in Google search and various results appear; take your pick.

I wonder if Jane was having one of them there false memories?  I have no idea how the police see things, but I would trust what a witness told me a few days after the event more than I would trust what they said one or two years later.

[John]

But DCI Redwood said "they". Have you considered that the mother may have been collecting another child from the night creche at the same time?

The mother could have been with the man, walking some distance ahead or behind as often happens with other children.  The bottom line is that Redwood appeared to have been convinced that Tannerman and Crècheman were one and the same.  However, his failure to explain the questionable direction of travel or whether he was accompanied by his wife has left a big question mark over his "revelation moment".

[jassi]

I think 'they' is just a figure of speech. Kate also said 'they' in connection to who had taken Madeleine

[Mr Gray]

The mother could have been with the man, walking some distance ahead or behind as often happens with other children.  The bottom line is that Redwood appeared to have been convinced that Tannerman and Crècheman were one and the same.  However, his failure to explain the questionable direction of travel or whether he was accompanied by his wife has left a big questionmark over his "revelation moment".

Is the direction of travel being taken purely from the documentary.... It may just be the documentary that was inaccurate

[John]

The revelation moment for me was when Redwood agreed with Amaral that the Tanner sighting was irrelevant and a red herring.  That effectively shifted the focus to the Smith sighting and a mystery man who has never come forward.

[Mr Gray]

The revelation moment for me was when Redwood agreed with Amaral that the Tanner sighting was irrelevant and a red herring.  That effectively shifted the focus to the Smith sighting and a mystery man who has never come forward.

But Redwood did not agree with amaral on who smithman was... Smithman could be the alleged abductor

[pathfinder73]

But Redwood did not agree with amaral on who smithman was... Smithman could be the alleged abductor

IMO Smithman was the abductor.

[Mr Gray]

IMO Smithman was the abductor.

Quite possibly... But cercertainly not Gerry imo

[pathfinder73]

Quite possibly... But cercertainly not Gerry imo

Whoever removed her from that apartment is the abductor.

[Mr Gray]

Whoever removed her from that apartment is the abductor.

Agreed... But it wasn't Gerry.. IMO... And it seems the opi ion of SY and the PJ

[pathfinder73]

Agreed... But it wasn't Gerry.. IMO... And it seems the opi ion of SY and the PJ

And it's still unsolved.

[Mr Gray]

And it's still unsolved.

But the parents are not suspects in either investigation according to the two police forces

[John]

A tad off topic but one must remember that removing a corpse is NOT abduction.

[Eleanor]

A tad off topic but one must remember that removing a corpse is NOT abduction.

Occulation, apparently.  At least, in Portuguese.